Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Toxicity to reproduction

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
two-generation reproductive toxicity
Remarks:
based on test type (migrated information)
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Data is from a publication

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Effect of the test chemical with respect to pregnancy and lactation of animals
Author:
McFarlane, M et.al,
Year:
1997
Bibliographic source:
Fd.Chem.Tox.1997

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline available
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Two generation study in rats by administering the test chemical in diets for a period varying from 5 weeks to 22 months for P and F1.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol
EC Number:
204-881-4
EC Name:
2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol
Cas Number:
128-37-0
Molecular formula:
C15H24O
IUPAC Name:
2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methylphenol
Test material form:
other: Solid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report):butylated hydroxytoluene(BHT)
-Synonyms-2,6-di-tert-butyl-p-cresol
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): C15H24O
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 220.3536 g/mol
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state:solid
- Impurities (identity and concentrations):0.1%(impurities not specified)
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): C15H24O
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): 220.3536 g/mol
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: solid
- Impurities (identity and concentrations): 0.1%(impurities not specified)

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Details on species / strain selection:
No Data Available
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Bantin and Kingman (Hull, UK)
- Age at study initiation: (P) x wks; (F1) x wks
- Weight at study initiation: (P) Males: 200 g; Females: 60 g;
- Fasting period before study:Not available
- Housing: Polypropylene cages with sterilized sawdust as bedding male rats were housed singly, females in groups of seven or eight.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum standard rodent breeding diet (CRM, Labsure)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period:2 wk

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 3°C
- Humidity (%):30-70%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-hr light dark cycle

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: feed
Vehicle:
other: Test chemical contained in the diet
Details on exposure:
DIET PREPARATION:
- Rate of preparation of diet (frequency):twice a week
- Mixing appropriate amounts with (Type of food): standard rodent breeding diet
VEHICLE: Test chemical contained in the diet
Details on mating procedure:
- M/F ratio per cage:1/8
- Length of cohabitation:5 week after first offering the test chemical containing diet and continuing until sufficient pregnancies obtained.
- Proof of pregnancy: [vaginal plug / sperm in vaginal smear] referred to as [day 0 / day 1] of pregnancy Not available
- After … days of unsuccessful pairing replacement of first male by another male with proven fertility. Not available
- Further matings after two unsuccessful attempts: [no / yes (explain)] Not available
- After successful mating each pregnant female was caged (how): singly on sterilized wood chips
- Any other deviations from standard protocol:-Not available
Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
not specified
Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
No Data Available
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Exposure period: male: 5 weeks (F0)
4 weeks (F1) and 22 months (F1)
female: 8 weeks (F0)
Premating exposure period (males): 3 weeks
Premating exposure period (females): 3 weeks
Frequency of treatment:
Daily
Details on study schedule:
Animals were offered diets containing the test chemical ,concentration of the test chemical adjusted every 2 weeks. Male rats were allowed access to female rats at commencing 5 wk after first offering the test chemical containing diet and continuing until sufficient pregnancies were obtained and ensure number of pups of the F1, generation. Throughout pregnancy and lactation, dams continued to receive the dose of the test chemical.

Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
F0-0,25,100 or 500 mg/kg bw day F1: 0, 25, 100 or 250 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
nominal in diet
No. of animals per sex per dose:
Control: 7 males and 50 females
25 mg/kg bw/day:7 males and 50 females
100 or 500 mg/kg bw/day:7 males and 50 females
Control animals:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Details on study design:
Dose ranging study was done for dose selection
Positive control:
No Data Available

Examinations

Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS:
Time:Daily
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations:Weekly
ORGAN WEIGHT: Yes
Histopathological examinations:Yes
FOOD CONSUMPTION AND COMPOUND INTAKE (if feeding study): Yes
liver-biochemistry.: Yes
Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
No data
Sperm parameters (parental animals):
No data
Litter observations:
Examinations included:
number of foetuses/dams, number of pups per litter, number of pups found dead.
Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
GROSS NECROPSY: Liver, kidney, thyroid, lung, adrenal and body fat (with emphasis on the liver).
Postmortem examinations (offspring):
GROSS NECROPSY: Liver, kidney, thyroid, lung, adrenal and body fat (with emphasis on the liver)

Statistics:
Statistical analysis of data was performed using Student's t-test.
Reproductive indices:
Pregnancy proceeded normally in all groups of animals.There was no alteration in numbers of resorption sites. No statistically significant change was seen in the number of foetuses/dams.
Offspring viability indices:
The number of pups per litter did not differ between dose groups. There was a trend to an increase in the number of pups found dead or dying soon after birth with increase in dose but the actual number of deaths in affected litters was not influenced by treatment with the test chemical.

Results and discussion

Results: P0 (first parental generation)

General toxicity (P0)

Clinical signs:
no effects observed
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not specified
Mortality:
not specified
Body weight and weight changes:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Dams given diets containing the test chemical at 750 or 1000 mg/kg body weight gained less weight than controls in the last week of pregnancy and did
not increase food consumption to the same extent during lactation, resulting in a fall in body weight. Dams treated with the test chemicals at nominal doses of 500 mg/kg body weight/day upwards showed a reduction in body weight gain during lactation.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Dams given diets containing the test chemical at 750 or 1000 mg/kg body weight id not increase food consumption to the same extent during lactation, resulting in a fall in body weight.
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
not specified
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified
Immunological findings:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
effects observed, treatment-related
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
not specified
Other effects:
no effects observed

Reproductive function / performance (P0)

Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
not specified
Reproductive function: sperm measures:
not specified
Reproductive performance:
no effects observed

Details on results (P0)

Dams receiving 500 mg of the test chemical/kg body weight and day showed a significant increase in liver weight. There was no alteration in numbers of resorption sites. No statistically significant change was seen in the number of foetuses/dam.
There were no differences in food consumtion or body weight gain between female control rats and female rats fed with the test chemical-containing diet. Reduced body weight gain observed, in male rats treated with 500 mg/kg body weight with the test chemical.

Effect levels (P0)

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
100 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: No effect on body weight and food consumption,no clinical signs of toxicity.

Target system / organ toxicity (P0)

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Results: F1 generation

General toxicity (F1)

Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
not specified
Mortality / viability:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
not specified
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
not specified
Food efficiency:
not specified
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not specified
Ophthalmological findings:
not specified
Haematological findings:
not specified
Clinical biochemistry findings:
not specified
Urinalysis findings:
not specified
Sexual maturation:
not specified
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
not specified
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Histopathological findings:
no effects observed
Other effects:
not specified

Developmental neurotoxicity (F1)

Behaviour (functional findings):
not specified

Developmental immunotoxicity (F1)

Developmental immunotoxicity:
not specified

Details on results (F1)

No significant effects on foetus development except pups belonging to 500 mg/kg bw/day failed to gain weight at the same rate as control pups.

Effect levels (F1)

Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Generation:
F1
Effect level:
500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: No differences in mating success or pregnancy were found. No alteration in numbers of resorption sites and no statistically significant change was seen in the number of fetuses per dam. The number of pups per litter did not differ

Target system / organ toxicity (F1)

Critical effects observed:
not specified

Overall reproductive toxicity

Reproductive effects observed:
not specified

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The NOAEL for toxicity to reproduction was assessed to be 500 mg/kg body weight and day; the NOAEL for parental toxicity was assessed to be 100 mg/kg body weight and day.
Executive summary:

The results of this two-generation reproductive and developmental toxicity study on Wistar rats revealed no adverse effects on reproductive performance of the F0 (P) generation. The animals were fed with the test chemical at dietary levels of 0, 25, 100 or 500 mg/kg body weight. Maternal toxicity, indicated by a significant increase of the liver weight, was seen at 500 mg/kg body weight and day. No differences in mating success were found in treated dams and pregnancy proceeded normally in all groups. There was no alteration in numbers of resorption sites and no statistically significant change was seen in the number of fetuses per dam. The number of pups per litter did not differ. According to the findings of this study, no adverse effects on reproduction were found. The NOAEL for toxicity to reproduction was assessed to be 500 mg/kg body weight and day; the NOAEL for parental toxicity was assessed to be 100 mg/kg body weight and day.