Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 942-293-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The experimental phase of this study was performed between 09 September 2009 and 11 October 2009.
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
Reference
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: read-across
- Justification for type of information:
- The registration substance is a tertiary amine oxide and the read-across substance the corresponding tertiary amine so that an inter-convertibility of the registration substance and the proposed read-across substance can be presumed.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- assessment report
- Remarks on result:
- other: The assessment is based on the read-across
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- JAPAN: Guidelines for Screening Mutagenicity Testing Of Chemicals
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5100 - Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test (August 1998)
- Version / remarks:
- Meets the requirements of the Japanese Regulatory Authorities including METI, MHLW and MAFF, OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 471 "and the USA, EPA (TSCA) OPPTS harmonised guidelines.
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Ethanol, 2,2'-iminobis-, N-coco alkyl derivs.
- EC Number:
- 263-163-9
- EC Name:
- Ethanol, 2,2'-iminobis-, N-coco alkyl derivs.
- Cas Number:
- 61791-31-9
- IUPAC Name:
- 61791-31-9
- Reference substance name:
- N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-C12-18(even numbered)alkyl-amine
- IUPAC Name:
- N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-C12-18(even numbered)alkyl-amine
- Details on test material:
- Sponsor's identification:Bis (2-hydroxyethyl) coco alkylamine (CAS Number 61791-31-9)
Description : Pale brown viscous liquid
Purity : 99.9%
Batch number : S-001016
Date received : 08 July 2009
Storage conditions: Approximately 4ºC in the dark under nitrogen
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Method
- Target gene:
- Histidine for Salmonella.
Tryptophan for E.Coli
Species / strainopen allclose all
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable.
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbitone/betanaphthoflavone induced rat liver, S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Preliminary Toxicity Test: 0, 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 µg/plate
Experiment one: Salmonella strains (absence of S9): 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 µg/plate.
Salmonella strains (presence of S9), E.coli strain WP2uvrA- (absence and presence of S9): 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 µg/plate.
Experiment two: Salmonella strains (absence of S9): 0.15, 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150 µg/plate.
Salmonella strains (presence of S9), E.coli strain WP2uvrA- (absence and presence of S9): 0.5, 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500 µg/plate. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: dimethyl sulphoxide.
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test material was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at 50 mg/ml in solubility checks performed in house. Distilled water was not evaluated as a potential vehicle in this test system as information provided by the sponsor suggested it was immiscible with the test material. Dimethyl sulphoxide was therefore selected as the vehicle.
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rates of TA100
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene: 1 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- With S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rates of TA1535
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene: 2 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- With S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rates of TA1537
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene: 2 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- With S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rates of WP2uvrA
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene: 10 µg/plate
- Remarks:
- With S9 mix
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rates of TA98
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- With S9 mix Migrated to IUCLID6: Benzo(a)pyrene: 5 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rates of TA98
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix Migrated to IUCLID6: 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide: 0.2 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rates of TA1537
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix Migrated to IUCLID6: 9-Aminoacridine: 80 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rates of TA100
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix Migrated to IUCLID6: N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine: 3 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rates of TA1535
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- Without S9 mix Migrated to IUCLID6: N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine: 5 µg/plate
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Spontaneous mutation rates of WP2uvrA
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Dimethyl sulphoxide
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- Without S9 mix Migrated to IUCLID6: N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine: 2 µg/plate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Preincubation period for bacterial strains: 10h
- Exposure duration: 48 - 72 hrs
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): Not applicable
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): Not applicable
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Triplicate plating.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: plates were assessed for numbers of revertant colonies and examined for effects on the growth of the bacterial background lawn. - Evaluation criteria:
- Acceptance Criteria:
The reverse mutation assay may be considered valid if the following criteria are met:
All tester strain cultures exhibit a characteristic number of spontaneous revertants per plate in the vehicle and untreated controls.
The appropriate characteristics for each tester strain have been confirmed, eg rfa cell-wall mutation and pKM101 plasmid R-factor etc.
All tester strain cultures should be in the approximate range of 1 to 9.9 x 109 bacteria per ml.
Each mean positive control value should be at least twice the respective vehicle control value for each strain, thus demonstrating both the intrinsic sensitivity of the tester strains to mutagenic exposure and the integrity of the S9-mix.
There should be a minimum of four non-toxic test material dose levels.
There should not be an excessive loss of plates due to contamination.
Evaluation criteria:
There are several criteria for determining a positive result, such as a dose-related increase in revertant frequency over the dose range tested and/or a reproducible increase at one or more concentrations in at least one bacterial strain with or without metabolic activation. Biological relevance of the results will be considered first, statistical methods, as recommended by the UKEMS can also be used as an aid to evaluation, however, statistical significance will not be the only determining factor for a positive response.
A test material will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
Although most experiments will give clear positive or negative results, in some instances the data generated will prohibit a definitive judgement about the test material activity. Results of this type will be reported as equivocal. - Statistics:
- Standard deviation
Dunnett's Linear Regression Analysis
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- In the first experiment (plate incorporation method) the test material caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the tester strains, initially at 150 and 500 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9, respective
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- In the first experiment (plate incorporation method) the test material caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the tester strains, initially at 150 and 500 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9, respective
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Solubility: The test material was fully miscible in dimethyl sulphoxide at 50 mg/ml in solubility checks performed in house. Distilled water was not evaluated as a potential vehicle in this test system as information provided by the sponsor suggested it was immiscible with the test material. Dimethyl sulphoxide was therefore selected as the vehicle.
- Precipitation: A precipitate (particulate in appearance) was initially noted at and above 500 µg/plate, this observation did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Preliminary Toxicity Test:
The test material initially exhibited toxicity to the strains of bacteria used (TA100 and WP2uvrA-) from 150 and 500 µg/plate, respectively. The test material formulation and S9-mix used in this experiment were both shown to be sterile.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
Prior to use, the master strains were checked for characteristics, viability and spontaneous reversion rate (all were found to be satisfactory).
Results for the negative controls (spontaneous mutation rates) were considered to be acceptable.
All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies thus confirming the activity of the S9-mix and the sensitivity of the bacterial strains.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: In the first experiment (plate incorporation method) the test material caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the tester strains, initially at 150 and 500 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9, respectively. In the second experiment (pre-incubation method) the test material induced toxicity to the bacterial background lawns of all of the tester strains initially from 50 µg/plate. The test material was, therefore tested up to the toxic limit. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
RESULTS
Preliminary Toxicity Test
The test material initially exhibited toxicity to the strains of bacteria used (TA100 and WP2uvrA-) from 150 and 500 µg/plate, respectively. The test material formulation and S9-mix used in this experiment were both shown to be sterile.
The numbers of revertant colonies for the toxicity assay were:
With (+) or without (-) S9-mix |
Strain |
Dose (µg/plate) |
||||||||||
0 |
0.15 |
0.5 |
1.5 |
5 |
15 |
50 |
150 |
500 |
1500 |
5000 |
||
- |
TA100 |
87 |
69 |
71 |
71 |
84 |
84 |
71 |
0V |
0T |
0T |
0TP |
+ |
TA100 |
73 |
86 |
95 |
77 |
80 |
62 |
83 |
77 |
0V |
0T |
0TP |
- |
WP2uvrA- |
32 |
33 |
24 |
28 |
31 |
25 |
25 |
17 |
0V |
0T |
0TP |
+ |
WP2uvrA- |
30 |
33 |
28 |
26 |
27 |
21 |
20 |
31 |
15S |
0T |
0TP |
S Sparse
bacterial background lawn
V Very weak bacterial background lawn
T Toxic, no bacterial background lawn
P Precipitate
MutationTest
Prior to use, the master strains were checked for characteristics, viability and spontaneous reversion rate (all were found to be satisfactory). These data are not given in the report. The amino acid supplemented top agar and the S9-mix used in both experiments was shown to be sterile.
Results for the negative controls (spontaneous mutation rates) are presented inTable 1 and were considered to be acceptable. These data are for concurrent untreated control plates performed on the same day as the Mutation Test.
The individual plate counts, the mean number of revertant colonies and the standard deviations for the test material, vehicle and positive controls both with and without metabolic activation, are presented in Table 2 to Table 5.
In the first experiment (plate incorporation method) the test material caused a visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawns of all of the tester strains, initially at 150 and 500 µg/plate in the absence and presence of S9, respectively. In the second experiment (pre-incubation method) the test material induced toxicity to the bacterial background lawns of all of the tester strains initially from 50 µg/plate. The test material was, therefore tested up to the toxic limit. A precipitate (particulate in appearance) was initially noted at and above 500 µg/plate, this observation did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.
No toxicologically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies were recorded for any of the bacterial strains, with any dose of the test material, either with or without metabolic activation. A small, statistically significant increase in TA100 revertant colony frequency was observed (presence of S9) at 5 µg/plate in Experiment 1. This response was considered not to be toxicologically significant because it was non-reproducible in three separate Experiments (including the Preliminary Toxicity Assay), the mean revertant count at 5 µg/plate was only 1.17 times the concurrent vehicle control value and individual revertant counts were within the acceptable in-house historical range for the bacterial tester strain.
All of the positive control chemicals used in the test induced marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies thus confirming the activity of the S9-mix and the sensitivity of the bacterial strains.
Table 1 Spontaneous Mutation Rates (Concurrent Negative Controls
Range-finding Test
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA- |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||
123 |
|
11 |
|
22 |
|
26 |
|
10 |
|
98 |
(105) |
15 |
(15) |
18 |
(19) |
16 |
(22) |
12 |
(11) |
95 |
|
18 |
|
18 |
|
24 |
|
11 |
|
Main Test
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
|||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA- |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
|||||
128 |
|
15 |
|
21 |
|
22 |
|
14 |
|
100 |
(108) |
16 |
(16) |
22 |
(22) |
22 |
(22) |
12 |
(12) |
95 |
|
18 |
|
22 |
|
22 |
|
11 |
|
Table 2 Test Results: Range-Finding Test– Without Metabolic Activation
Test Period |
From: 27 September 2009 |
To: 30 September 2009 |
||||||||||
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (µg/plate) |
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
||||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA- |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||
- |
0 |
109 97 89 |
(98) 10.1# |
14 14 18 |
(15) 2.3 |
25 22 21 |
(23) 2.1 |
17 22 21 |
(20) 2.6 |
10 10 8 |
(9) 1.2 |
|
- |
0.5 |
96 102 85 |
(94) 8.6 |
13 21 15 |
(16) 4.2 |
N/T |
22 18 16 |
(19) 3.1 |
13 13 8 |
(11) 2.9 |
||
- |
1.5 |
85 99 106 |
(97) 10.7 |
15 14 14 |
(14) 0.6 |
24 19 16 |
(20) 4.0 |
17 17 18 |
(17) 0.6 |
9 12 11 |
(11) 1.5 |
|
- |
5 |
114 98 106 |
(106) 8.0 |
15 15 17 |
(16) 1.2 |
19 19 22 |
(20) 1.7 |
22 20 25 |
(22) 2.5 |
9 9 10 |
(9) 0.6 |
|
- |
15 |
104 92 110 |
(102) 9.2 |
17 16 12 |
(15) 2.6 |
19 19 22 |
(20) 1.7 |
22 20 19 |
(20) 1.5 |
15 9 10 |
(11) 3.2 |
|
- |
50 |
136 105 90 |
(110) 23.5 |
13 19 16 |
(16) 3.0 |
19 20 21 |
(20) 1.0 |
19 18 18 |
(18) 0.6 |
7 8 7 |
(7) 0.6 |
|
- |
150 |
92 V 49 V 48 V |
(63) 25.1 |
7 V 6 V 15 V |
(9) 4.9 |
20 17 17 |
(18) 1.7 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
|
- |
500 |
0 TP 0 TP 0 TP |
(0) 0.0 |
0 TP 0 TP 0 TP |
(0) 0.0 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
0 TP 0 TP 0 TP |
(0) 0.0 |
0 TP 0 TP 0 TP |
(0) 0.0 |
|
- |
1500 |
N/T |
N/T |
0 TP 0 TP 0 TP |
(0) 0.0 |
N/T |
N/T |
|||||
Positive controls
S9-Mix
- |
Name Concentration (μg/plate) No. colonies per plate |
ENNG |
ENNG |
ENNG |
4NQO |
9AA |
||||||
3 |
5 |
2 |
0.2 |
80 |
||||||||
383 293 381 |
(352) 51.4 |
205 276 243 |
(241) 35.5 |
719 761 668 |
(716) 46.6 |
191 106 126 |
(141) 44.4 |
1011 1003 913 |
(976) 54.4 |
|||
ENNG N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
4NQO 4-Nitroquinoline-1-oxide
9AA 9-Aminoacridine
N/T Not tested at this dose level
P Precipitate
T Toxic, no bacterial background lawn
V Very weak bacterial background lawn
# Standard
deviation
Table 3 Test Results: Range-Finding Test– With Metabolic Activation
Test Period |
From: 27 September 2009 |
To: 30 September 2009 |
||||||||||
With or without S9-Mix |
Test substance concentration (µg/plate) |
Number of revertants (mean number of colonies per plate) |
||||||||||
Base-pair substitution type |
Frameshift type |
|||||||||||
TA100 |
TA1535 |
WP2uvrA- |
TA98 |
TA1537 |
||||||||
+ |
0 |
80 84 85 |
(83) 2.6# |
15 11 12 |
(13) 2.1 |
22 19 20 |
(20) 1.5 |
24 24 24 |
(24) 0.0 |
8 7 11 |
(9) 2.1 |
|
+ |
1.5 |
82 90 91 |
(88) 4.9 |
11 10 11 |
(11) 0.6 |
21 21 20 |
(21) 0.6 |
25 24 25 |
(25) 0.6 |
13 10 13 |
(12) 1.7 |
|
+ |
5 |
101 101 90 |
$$$ (97) 6.4 |
10 8 12 |
(10) 2.0 |
22 19 19 |
(20) 1.7 |
21 25 18 |
(21) 3.5 |
7 12 7 |
(9) 2.9 |
|
+ |
15 |
82 90 81 |
(84) 4.9 |
11 7 10 |
(9) 2.1 |
20 21 24 |
(22) 2.1 |
21 17 17 |
(18) 2.3 |
10 9 9 |
(9) 0.6 |
|
+ |
50 |
89 88 80 |
(86) 4.9 |
8 9 8 |
(8) 0.6 |
19 19 22 |
(20) 1.7 |
24 27 22 |
(24) 2.5 |
9 8 8 |
(8) 0.6 |
|
+ |
150 |
80 79 80 |
(80) 0.6 |
8 9 8 |
(8) 0.6 |
17 18 20 |
(18) 1.5 |
21 20 15 |
(19) 3.2 |
12 11 10 |
(11) 1.0 |
|
+ |
500 |
0 V 0 V 0 V |
(0) 0.0 |
0 T 0 T 0 T |
(0) 0.0 |
12 S 9 S 11 S |
(11) 1.5 |
0 T 0 T 0 T |
(0) 0.0 |
0 T 0 T 0 T |
(0) 0.0 |
|
+ |
1500 |
0 TP 0 TP 0 TP |
(0) 0.0 |
0 TP 0 TP 0 TP |
(0) 0.0 |
0 TP 0 TP 0 TP |
(0) 0.0 |
0 TP 0 TP 0 TP |
(0) 0.0 |
0 TP 0 TP 0 TP |
(0) 0.0 |
|
Positive controls
S9-Mix
+ |
Name Concentration (μg/plate) No. colonies per plate |
2AA |
2AA |
2AA |
BP |
2AA |
||||||
1 |
2 |
10 |
5 |
2 |
||||||||
1510 2079 2379 |
(1989) 441.4 |
112 156 183 |
(150) 35.8 |
371 340 348 |
(353) 16.1 |
215 251 208 |
(225) 23.1 |
313 292 314 |
(306) 12.4 |
|||
2AA 2-Aminoanthracene
BP Benzo(a)pyrene
P Precipitate
S Sparse bacterial background lawn
T Toxic, no bacterial background lawn
V Very weak bacterial background lawn
$$$ p<0.005
# Standard deviation
PLEASE SEE OVERALL REMARKS,) Tables 4 and 5 (Experiment 2)
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The read-across supporting substance N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-C12-18(even numbered)alkyl-amine did not induce any genotoxicity effect in Ames test (OECD 471). No significant mutagenicity can be derived for the registration substance. - Executive summary:
The genotoxicity of the registration substance is derived by use of data on the read-across supporting substance N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-C12-18(even numbered)alkyl-amine.
N,N-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-C12-18(even numbered)alkyl-amine was investigated for its genotoxicity according to the OECD Guideline 471. No significant gentoxicity was found.
Likewise, no significant genotoxicity is expected for the registration substance.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.