Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-802-8 | CAS number: 99-93-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation, other
- Remarks:
- in vivo test already available
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: well-documented GLP study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 992
- Report date:
- 1992
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.4100 (Skin Sensitisation)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- testing lab.
- Type of study:
- guinea pig maximisation test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 4'-hydroxyacetophenone
- EC Number:
- 202-802-8
- EC Name:
- 4'-hydroxyacetophenone
- Cas Number:
- 99-93-4
- Molecular formula:
- C8H8O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethan-1-one
- Details on test material:
- Name of the test substance used in the study report: C-01650 (4-HAP)
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- guinea pig
- Strain:
- Hartley
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- Weight at study initiation: 300-500 grams, at time of dosing
Acclimation period: at least 7 days
Animal identification: Each animal was assigned an unique and individual number. This number was permanently indicated on the animal with a tar tag.
They were housed individually in stainless steel, wire mesh bottom cages (temperature: 64 - 79°F, humidity: 40 - 70%, light/dark rhythm: 12/12).
Fresh guinea Pig feed was provided ad libitium throughout both the acclimation and study periods; water was provided ad libitum.
Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Inductionopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- other: propylene glycol
- Concentration / amount:
- Intradermal range finding phase: 5, 4, 2 and 1% of the test article
Topical range finding phase: 75, 50, 25 and 10% of the test article
Challenge: 0.5 g of a 75% mixture
Challengeopen allclose all
- Route:
- intradermal
- Vehicle:
- other: propylene glycol
- Concentration / amount:
- Intradermal range finding phase: 5, 4, 2 and 1% of the test article
Topical range finding phase: 75, 50, 25 and 10% of the test article
Challenge: 0.5 g of a 75% mixture
- No. of animals per dose:
- total: 50
- Details on study design:
- Intradermal injection (as a 5% solution in propylene glycol with and without Freund's adjuvant) and then by topical application (5% in propylene glycol) eight days later.
Two weeks after the second induction, animals were challenged with 0.5 g of test material as a 75% preparation in petrolatum using a 24-h dermal exposure.
Intradermal Range Finding Study: Four w/v dilutions of the test artiele were prepared in propylene glycol and administered to each of five guines pigs. The dilutions used were 5%, 4%, 2%, and 1 %. Each dilution was intradermally injected at a volume of 0.1 ml. Two injections on each side of the dorsal midline were made above the scapular region.
Approximately 24 and 48 hours after dosing, all sites were scored for erythema and edema according to the Draize scoring.
Topical Range Finding Study: Four w/w dilutions of the test article were prepared in petrolatum and administered to each of five guinea pigs. The concentrations used were: 75%, 50%, 25%, and 10%. A dose of 0.5 gram of each concentration of the test article was applied to a one square inch gauze patch which was then placed on the skin of the flank region. Two patches wert placed on each side of the dorsal midline. The patches were taped in place and the trunk of the animal was wrapped with a non-reactive, occlusive wrapping.
Approximately 24 hours following patch application, all wrappings were removed and the skin wiped to remove any remaining lest article.
Approximately 24 and 48 hours after patch removal, all sites were scored for erythema and edema according to the Draize scoring method. From these readings, the highest non-irritating dose level was selected for the challenge phase of the study. - Positive control substance(s):
- yes
Results and discussion
In vivo (non-LLNA)
Results
- Reading:
- other: challenge
- Hours after challenge:
- 24
- Group:
- test chemical
- Dose level:
- 75% of a mixture
- No. with + reactions:
- 0
- Total no. in group:
- 20
- Remarks on result:
- other: Reading: other: challenge. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 75% of a mixture. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- not sensitising
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Conclusions:
- Under the conditions of this test, 4-HAP, CAS# 99-93-4) is considered to be a non-sensitizer (0% sensitized) and the positive control, DNCB, is considered to be an extreme sensitizer (100% sensitized).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
