Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1986

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method; Other: Salmonella preincubation assay (modification of the standard plate incorporation assay)
Method; Other: Ames BN, McCann J, Yamasaki E (1975): Methods for detecting carcinogens and mutagens with the Salmonella/mammalian microsome mutagenicity test. Mutat Res 31:347-364.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Sodium diethyldithiocarbamate
EC Number:
205-710-6
EC Name:
Sodium diethyldithiocarbamate
Cas Number:
148-18-5
Molecular formula:
C5H11NS2.Na
IUPAC Name:
sodium (diethylcarbamothioyl)sulfanide

Method

Target gene:
his
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
rat liver S-9, Aroclor 1254-induced or hamster liver S-9, Aroclor 1254-induced
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
0.0, 33.0, 100.0, 333.0, 1000.0, 3333.0 and 10000.0 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent used: DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
for TA 1535 and TA 100
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 4-nitro-o-phenylenediamine
Remarks:
for TA98
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
for TA97 and TA 1537
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-aminoanthracene
Remarks:
for all strains with hamster and rat liver metabolic activation systems
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 minutes at 37°C followed by 48 hours at 37°C

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3
Evaluation criteria:
The criteria used for data evaluation were as follows: 1) mutagenic response: a dose-related, reproducible increase in the number of revertants over background, even if the increase was less than twofold; 2) nonmutagenic response: when no increase in the number of revertants was elicited by the chemical; 3) questionable response: when there was an absence of a clear-cut dose-related increase in revertants; when the dose-related increases in the number of revertants were not reproducible; or when the response was of insufficient magnitude to support a determination of mutagenicity.

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
initially tested with strain TA100 in the presence and the absence of the metabolic activation systems, over a wide dose range

Any other information on results incl. tables

Dose

TA 100

TA 1535

NA

10% HLI

10%RLI

NA

10% HLI

10%RLI

µg/plate

MEAN

SEM 

MEAN

SEM 

MEAN

SEM 

MEAN

SEM 

MEAN

SEM 

MEAN

SEM 

0.0 (DMSO)

96

1.5

104

3.0

97

4.2

8

1.2

8

1.3

13

0.3

33.0

75

2.6

94

4.7

82

5.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

100.0

80

1.5

83

1.9

85

3.2

11

1.2

15

1.9

12

3.8

333.0

83

5.6

85

12.5

81

1.2

8

1.5

9

1.8

15

1.7

1000.0

65

12.1

102

5.8

97

7.0

7

1.7

10

2.7

10

1.5

3333.0

0

0.0

2

1.5

1

1.0

5

1.5

7

0.9

7

2.4

10000.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

0

0.0

1

0.9

0

0.5

POS

384

20.4

2285

33.2

2285

35.2

117

8.4

131

29.6

37

6.6

 

Dose

TA 1537

TA 98

NA

10% HLI

10%RLI

NA

10% HLI

10%RLI

µg/plate

MEAN

SEM 

MEAN

SEM 

MEAN

SEM 

MEAN

SEM 

MEAN

SEM 

MEAN

SEM 

0.0 (DMSO)

10

1.3

3

0.3

7

1.2

11

1.2

12

2.6

16

3.1

33.0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

100.0

1

0.3

3

0.6

6

0.3

12

1.9

12

2.0

15

2.6

333.0

1

0.6

3

0.3

3

2.8

7

1.9

17

2.3

18

1.5

1000.0

1

0.6

2

0.9

2

0.7

8

1.2

15

5.2

14

4.2

3333.0

0

0.3

1

0.9

2

0.3

7

1.8

11

2.5

10

1.8

10000.0

0

0.0

1

0.3

1

0.3

0

0.0

10

1.5

8

1.5

POS

28

3.8

89

8.5

130

15.5

92

10.2

883

25.4

127

13.3

Abbreviations:

POS: positive control; NA, not activated; RLI, rat liver S-9, Aroclor 1254-induced; HLI, hamster liver S-9, Aroclor 1254-induced

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
No increased number of revertants was found, indicating that the substance SDEC is not mutagenic in Ames test.
Executive summary:

In a Salmonella preincubation assay, according to Ames et al. (1975), strains TA1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100 of S. typhimurium were exposed to SDEC at of 0.0, 33.0, 100.0, 333.0, 1000.0, 3333.0 and 10000.0 µg/plate, with and without metabolic activation. The test substance was tested up to the required limit concentrations (up to 5000 µg/plate). The compound did not induce any significant increase in the observed numbers of revertant colonies in any of the tester strains used, neither in the presence or absence of metabolism (S9). The positive controls induced the appropriate responses in the corresponding strains. There was no evidence of induced mutant colonies over background. In conclusion, the test substance SDEC is not-mutagenic in the Ames test.