Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Carcinogenicity: via oral route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Carcinogenicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Carcinogenicity: via dermal route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Justification for classification or non-classification

Additional information

No carcinogenicity study is required since the registration substance is not mutagenic and no observations have been made in the available subchronic studies which would indicate a carcinogenic potential of the substance.


Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via oral route endpoint:
No carcinogenicity study is required since the registration substance is not mutagenic and no observations have been made in the available studies which would indicate a carcinogenic potential of the substance.

Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via inhalation route endpoint:
No carcinogenicity study is required since the registration substance is not mutagenic and no observations have been made in the available studies which would indicate a carcinogenic potential of the substance.
Furthermore, exposure of humans via inhalation is, at any rate, unlikely taking into account the possibility of exposure to aerosols, particles or droplets of an inhalable size. Sucroglyceride C12-18, C18unsatd. is a waxy solid paste. Taking this consistence into account the generating of inhalable particles such as dust or aerosols is not significant due to the specific operational conditions.

Justification for selection of carcinogenicity via dermal route endpoint:
No carcinogenicity study is required since the registration substance is not mutagenic and no observations have been made in the available studies which would indicate a carcinogenic potential of the substance.
Furthermore, systemic exposure of humans by the dermal route is unlikely taking into account that a significant rate of absorption through the skin cannot be expected.