Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 221-140-0 | CAS number: 3010-96-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
The potential for 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-1,3-cyclobutanediol to induce genetic toxicity (mutations/aberrations) was thoroughly characterized in three different in vitro assays that followed OECD guidelines 471, 473, and 476. All studies were also conducted under GLP assurances. None of the studies showed evidence of genotoxicity
In a study following OECD 471, the test article was assessed for its potential to induce gene mutations using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, and TA 100, and the Escherichia coli strain WP2 uvrA. The assay was performed in two independent experiments both with and without liver microsomal activation (S9 mix). Each concentration and the controls were tested in triplicate up to 5000 ug/plate. No toxic effects, evident as a reduction in the number of revertants, occurred in the test groups with and without metabolic activation. Appropriate reference mutagens were used as positive controls and they showed a distinct increase of induced revertant colonies. No substantial increase in revertant colony numbers of any of the five tester strains was observed following treatment at any concentration level, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9 mix).
A second study (OECD 476) assessed the potential of 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-1,3-cyclobutanediol to induce mutations at the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y. The assay was performed in two independent experiments, using two parallel cultures each. The first main experiment was performed with and without liver microsomal activation and a treatment period of 4 h. The second experiment was solely performed in the absence of metabolic activation with a treatment period of 24 hours. The highest applied concentration (1500 μg/mL) was chosen with regard to the molecular weight of the test item corresponding to a molar concentration of about 10 mM. Appropriate reference mutagens used as positive controls showed a distinct increase in induced mutant colonies, indicating that the tests were sensitive and valid. No substantial and reproducible dose dependent increase in mutant colony numbers was observed in both main experiments. No relevant shift of the ratio of small versus large colonies was observed up to the maximal concentration of the test item.
The third study was conducted following OECD test guideline 473 assessed for the potential of 2,2,4,4-tetramethyl-1,3-cyclobutanediol to induce structural chromosome aberrations in Chinese Hamster V79 cell line in two independent experiments. In each experimental group two parallel cultures were set up. Dose selection for the cytogenetic experiments was performed considering the toxicity data. The chosen treatment concentrations were 45.0, 90.0, 180.0, 360.0, 720.0, and 1440.0 ug/ml +/- S9. Per culture 100 metaphase plates were scored for structural chromosome aberrations, except for the positive control in Experiment II with metabolic activation, where only 50 metaphase plates per culture were scored. In the absence and the presence of S9 mix, no cytotoxicity was observed up to the highest applied concentration. Appropriate mutagens used as positive controls induced statistically significant increases in cells with structural chromosome aberrations. In both independent experiments, neither a statistically significant nor a biologically relevant increase in the number of cells carrying structural chromosomal aberrations was observed after treatment with the test item. No relevant increase in the frequencies of polyploid metaphases was found after treatment with the test item as compared to the frequencies of the controls.
Endpoint Conclusion: No adverse effect observed (negative)
Justification for classification or non-classification
No evidence of genotoxicity was observed in any study, accordingly no classification is warranted.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.