Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Sensitisation data (human)

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
sensitisation data (humans)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Acceptable, reasonably well documented publication
Justification for type of information:
Since the sorbate anion in the (eco-) toxicologically relevant moiety and its presence in dissociated or non-dissociated form is entirely determined by pH, extrapolation to potassium sorbate, the substance in question, is not considered to be restricted.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1974

Materials and methods

Type of sensitisation studied:
skin
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Method followed: Draize test (Draize, 1959)
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Hexa-2,4-dienoic acid
EC Number:
203-768-7
EC Name:
Hexa-2,4-dienoic acid
Cas Number:
110-44-1
Molecular formula:
C6H8O2
IUPAC Name:
hexa-2,4-dienoic acid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material: Sorbic acid

Method

Type of population:
general
Subjects:
- Number of subjects exposed: (i) 181 subjects (induction concentration: 10 %), (ii) 121 subjects (induction concentration: 20 %)
- Sex: male
- Age: 21 to 50 years
- Race: approximately 82 % Caucasian, 13 % Negro and 5 % American Indian (Mexican)
Route of administration:
dermal
Details on study design:
TYPE OF TEST(S) USED: patch test

ADMINISTRATION
- Vehicle / solvent: petroatum
- Induction schedule: 3.5 week periods of repeated dosing
- Concentrations used for induction (occlusive epicutanoues): (i) 10 %, (ii) 20 %
- Challenge schedule: two weeks after last induction
- Concentrations used for challenge (occlusive epicutanoues): 5 %
- Rechallenge: to verify reproducibility, positives (grade 2 - 4) were retested a week or two later, and most grade 1 subjects were retested weekly

EXAMINATIONS
- Grading: erythema and oedema
- Statistical analysis: fourfold chi-square test

Results and discussion

Results of examinations:
In two successive series of patch tests (Draize) involvoing a total of more than 300 human volunteers, sensitisation rates of 0 % (1st series) and 0.8 % (2nd series) were observed.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Sorbic acid at 20% and 5% challenge resulted in 1/121 volunteers, which indicates that sorbic acid is a rare sensitizer.