Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 924-149-4 | CAS number: 125109-84-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 23rd November 1988 to 29th December 1988
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- A GLP compliant study conducted in compliance with agreed protocols, with no or minor deviations from standard test guidelines and/or minor methodological deficiencies, which do not affect the quality of the relevant results. The read-across is considered to be suitable based on the structural and 'mechanistic action' similarities between the target substance (3-(3-isopropenylphenyl)butanal) and source substance (3-(3-isopropylphenyl)butanal) and their similar physico-chemical properties.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The study does not include a strain that can detect cross linkage.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Target gene:
- histidine operon
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: The strains were kept at 5 ± 5 °C on minimal medium supplemented with excess histidine, trace biotin and ampicillin (25 µg/mL) for TA98 and TA 100. New stock cultures were made from the frozen master cultures where necessary or from single colony re-isolates that were checked for their genotype and the presence of the plasmid.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: The strains were kept at 5 ± 5 °C on minimal medium supplemented with excess histidine, trace biotin and ampicillin (25 µg/mL) for TA98 and TA 100. New stock cultures were made from the frozen master cultures where necessary or from single colony re-isolates that were checked for their genotype and the presence of the plasmid.
- Properly maintained: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 microsomal fraction
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.0005 - 0.250 µL/plate (without metabolic activation); 0.001 - 0.500 µL/plate (with metabolic activation)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- other: quinacrine mustard, 2-anthramine
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium (Vogel Bonner Medium E with 0.2 % glucose and 1.5 % agar.
In a sterile test tube containing 2 mL of molten overlay agar in a 43-45 °C water bath, 0.05 mL of the test material was combined with 0.1 mL of the tester strain. The mixture was swirled gently and then poured on the surface of minimal agar plates. After the top agar had set, the plates were incubated at 37 ± 2 °C for 48 to 72 hours. The number of his+ revertant colonies growing on the plates were counted using an automated colony counter and recorded. The S9 activation assays were run concurrently with the only difference being the addition of 0.5 mL S9 mix in place of 0.5 mL of phosphate buffer.
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 48-72 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Performed in triplicate
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY: Appearance of microcolonies and/or clearing of the background lawn - Evaluation criteria:
- TA-1535, TA-1537 and TA-1538:
Data sets will be evaluated as positive if a dose response is observed over a minimum of three test concentrations and the increase in revertants is equal to or greater than three times the solvent control value at the peak of the dose response.
TA-98 and TA-100:
Data sets will be evaluated as positive if a dose response is observed over a minimum of three test concentrations and the increase in revertants achieves a doubling of the solvent control value at the peak of the dose response. - Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Background lawn was found to be reduced in the both experiments at the highest dose tested in both the assay with and without metabolic activation.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- Background lawn was found to be reduced in the both experiments at the highest dose tested in both the assay with and without metabolic activation.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
Does levels to be used in the mutagenesis assays were selected from a preliminary study conducted on the test material at does from 150 to 0.018 µL/plate using strain TA-100. Cytotoxicity was observed at 0.146 µL/plate and above in the presence of S9 and at 0.073 µL/plate in the absence of S9 as evidence by the reduced number of revertants and/or the appearance of microcolonies on the minimal media plates. These results were used to select seven doses for the mutagenicity assays.
ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION:
- See “Justification for read-across” document attached in section 13 for full details.
- In summary, important considerations for the use of read-across for acute toxicity are: i) 3-(3-isopropenylphenyl)butanal (the target substance) has similar physico-chemical properties as 3-(3-isopropylphenyl)butanal (the source substance), ii) there are structural similarities between the two substances, iii) the OECD QSAR Toolbox assigns very similar toxicity profiles to both substances, with any differences indicating that the source substance may be representative of a worst case scenario. The information reported in this summary is included to demonstrate comparability between the source (3-(3-isopropylphenyl)butanal) and target substance (3-(3-isopropenylphenyl)butanal). - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with and without metabolic activation
Under the conditions of the test, the test material did not exhibit genetic activity in any of the assays conducted and was not mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium indicator organisms under the test conditions. - Executive summary:
The test material was examined for mutagenic activity in the Ames Salmonella/Microsome assays using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA-1535, TA-1537, TA-1538, TA-98 and TA-100. The assays were conducted using three plates per dose level in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system. The entire assay was performed twice, confirming the negative response observed. The test material was found to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of the test.
Reference
Table 1: Summary of results 1stexperiment
Dose (µL/plate) |
Mean Revertants per Plate with Standard Deviations |
||||
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 1538 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
|
Without S9 |
|||||
Vehicle |
11 ± 3 |
9 ± 2 |
9 ± 3 |
18 ± 6 |
112 ± 11 |
0.0005 |
8 ± 5 |
12 ± 2 |
10 ± 3 |
19 ± 6 |
122 ± 8 |
0.001 |
11 ± 3 |
11 ± 4 |
8 ± 3 |
16 ± 3 |
107 ± 13 |
0.010 |
10 ± 3 |
9 ± 4 |
9 ± 1 |
13 ± 1 |
123 ± 2 |
0.025 |
9 ± 4 |
6 ± 2 |
11 ± 3 |
12 ± 4 |
108 ± 12 |
0.050 |
11 ± 1 |
3 ± 3 |
6 ± 2 |
12 ± 3 |
100 ± 10 |
0.100 |
7 ± 2 |
2 ± 2 |
6 ± 3 |
12 2) 3 |
79 ± 10 |
0.250 |
4 ± 2 |
0 ± 0 |
0 ± 0 |
3 ± 2 |
54 ± 7 |
Positive control* |
1514 ± 101 |
651 ± 96 |
1306 ± 166 |
1001 ± 30 |
1469 ± 117 |
With S9 |
|||||
Vehicle |
11 ± 2 |
12 ± 2 |
15 ± 3 |
23 ± 3 |
125 ± 6 |
0.001 |
10 ± 3 |
13 ± 5 |
15 ± 3 |
28 ± 6 |
149 ± 9 |
0.010 |
11 ± 4 |
12 ± 3 |
18 ± 4 |
24 ± 3 |
153 ± 4 |
0.025 |
14 ± 2 |
7 ± 5 |
17 ± 5 |
22 ± 2 |
141 ± 9 |
0.050 |
12 ± 1 |
11 ± 3 |
16 2) 4 |
24 ± 2 |
134 ± 9 |
0.100 |
12 ± 1 |
10 ± 2 |
14 ± 4 |
26 ± 2 |
134 ± 15 |
0.250 |
9 ± 5 |
3 ± 2 |
10 ± 2 |
19 ± 2 |
86 ± 3 |
0.500 |
11 ± 1 |
3 ± 0 |
8 ± 1 |
11 ± 2 |
80 ± 10 |
Positive control** |
200 ± 8 |
163 ± 5 |
989 ± 66 |
1318 ± 98 |
1673 ± 84 |
* TA 1535 and TA 100 10 µg/plate sodium azide; TA 1537 5 µg/plate quinacrine mustard; TA 1538 and TA 98 10 µg/plate 2-nitrofluorene ** 2.5 µg/plate 2-antramine all strains |
Table 2: Summary of results 2ndexperiment
Dose (µL/plate) |
Mean Revertants per Plate with Standard Deviations |
||||
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 1538 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
|
Without S9 |
|||||
Vehicle |
6 ± 5 |
8 ± 4 |
6 ± 4 |
22 ± 2 |
98 ± 12 |
0.0005 |
13 ± 2 |
9 ± 3 |
9 ± 3 |
20 ± 3 |
85 ± 5 |
0.001 |
9 ± 2 |
10 ± 2 |
8 ± 2 |
21 ± 3 |
93 ± 10 |
0.010 |
10 ± 4 |
10 ± 2 |
7 ± 3 |
23 ± 2 |
88 ± 9 |
0.025 |
11 ± 4 |
12 ± 1 |
5 ± 1 |
27 ± 1 |
99 ± 5 |
0.050 |
14 ± 1 |
7 ± 1 |
6 ± 2 |
22 ± 6 |
90 ± 19 |
0.100 |
10 ± 4 |
9 ± 3 |
9 ± 3 |
18 ± 10 |
85 ± 3 |
0.250 |
7 ± 2 |
5 ± 1 |
7 ± 2 |
8 ± 2 |
55 ± 8 |
Positive control* |
11693 ± 27 |
965 ± 91 |
1039 ± 79 |
808 ± 106 |
1060 ± 37 |
With S9 |
|||||
Vehicle |
14 ± 3 |
14 ± 8 |
13 ± 3 |
32 ± 3 |
137 ± 11 |
0.001 |
15 ± 6 |
16 ± 4 |
10 ± 5 |
35 ± 10 |
141 ± 12 |
0.010 |
14 ± 6 |
13 ± 3 |
10 ± 3 |
31 ± 10 |
127 ± 8 |
0.025 |
15 ± 7 |
15 ± 3 |
15 ± 3 |
39 ± 4 |
139 ± 10 |
0.050 |
16 ± 3 |
14 ± 4 |
14 ± 2 |
38 ± 5 |
139 ± 3 |
0.100 |
17 ± 1 |
14 ± 3 |
14 ± 3 |
34 ± 11 |
122 ± 11 |
0.250 |
13 ± 3 |
15 ± 6 |
17 ± 3 |
35 ± 3 |
131 ± 7 |
0.500 |
14 ± 5 |
7 ± 2 |
19 ± 8 |
18 ± 2 |
97 ± 14 |
Positive control** |
239 ± 17 |
155 ± 22 |
1311 ± 69 |
954 ± 156 |
1176 ± 18 |
* TA 1535 and TA 100 10 µg/plate sodium azide; TA 1537 5 µg/plate quinacrine mustard; TA 1538 and TA 98 10 µg/plate 2-nitrofluorene ** 2.5 µg/plate 2-antramine all strains |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
The test material was examined for mutagenic activity in the Ames Salmonella/Microsome assays using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA-1535, TA-1537, TA-1538, TA-98 and TA-100. The assays were conducted using three plates per dose level in the presence and absence of a metabolic activation system. The entire assay was performed twice. The test material did not exhibit genetic activity in these assays and was considered to be non-mutagenic under the test conditions.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Only one key study available.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to Regulation 1272/2008 and Directive 67/548/EEC, the substance does not require classification for genotoxicity.
On the basis that the test material for the genotoxicity study (3-(3-isopropylphenyl)butanal, tradename Florhydral) is being used to support 3-(3-isopropenylphenyl)butanal (Dehydro Florhydral) on the basis of read-across, Dehydro Florhydral is also considered to be unclassified for genotoxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.