Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 226-971-2 | CAS number: 5580-58-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2011-2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP and OECD guideline compliant study with well characterized test material
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tetramethyl 2,2'-[1,4-phenylenebis[imino(1-acetyl-2-oxoethane-1,2-diyl)azo]]bisterephthalate
- EC Number:
- 271-176-6
- EC Name:
- Tetramethyl 2,2'-[1,4-phenylenebis[imino(1-acetyl-2-oxoethane-1,2-diyl)azo]]bisterephthalate
- Cas Number:
- 68516-73-4
- Molecular formula:
- C34H32N6O12
- IUPAC Name:
- tetramethyl 2,2'-{1,4-phenylenebis[imino(1,3-dioxobutane-2,1-diyl)diazene-2,1-diyl]}diterephthalate
- Test material form:
- solid: nanoform, no surface treatment
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- TK locus
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI 1640 medium including stable glutamine supplemented with
1% (v/v) penicillin/streptomycin (10 000 IU / 10 000 μg/mL)
1% (v/v) sodium pyruvate (10 mM) (= RPMI-0)
For 4-hour exposure interval:
RPMI-0 supplemented with 5% (v/v) fetal calf serum (FCS) (= RPMI-5)
For 24-hour exposure interval and subculturing cells:
RPMI-0 is supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum (= RPMI-10)
For cloning efficiency and selection medium:
RPMI-0 supplemented with 20% (v/v) fetal calf serum (= RPMI-20)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- liver S9 fraction from rats pretreated with phenobarbital i.p. and β-naphthoflavone orally
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 1st Experiment
without S9 mix (4-hour exposure period)
0; 0.31; 0.63; 1.25; 2.5; 5.0; 10.0; 20.0 μg/mL
with S9 mix (4-hour exposure period)
0; 0.31; 0.63; 1.25; 2.5; 5.0; 10.0; 20.0 μg/mL
2nd Experiment
without S9 mix (24-hour exposure period)
0; 0.31; 0.63; 1.25; 2.5; 5.0; 10.0 μg/mL
with S9 mix (4-hour exposure period)
0; 0.25; 0.5; 1.0; 2.0; 4.0; 8.0 μg/mL - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
Controlsopen allclose all
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 4 - 5 days
- Exposure duration: 4h or 24h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): trifluorthymidine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: cloning efficiency, relative growth
OTHER: During the week prior to treatment, spontaneous TK deficient mutants (TK-/-) were eliminated from the stock cultures by incubating 1.5 x 10E6 cells per 75 cm² flask (5 x 104 cells/mL) for 1 day in “THMG" medium (pretreatment medium A), and for the following 3 days in “THG" medium (pretreatment medium B). - Evaluation criteria:
- The MLTK assay is considered valid if the following criteria are met considering the international guidelines and the current recommendations of the IWGT:
- The absolute cloning efficiency obtained at the time of mutant selection (CE2) of the negative/vehicle controls should fall in the range of 65 - 120%.
- The suspension growth (SG) of the negative/vehicle controls referring to the expression period following treatment should fall in the range of 8 - 32 for 4-hour exposure and 32 - 180 for 24-hour exposure.
- The mutant frequency of the negative/vehicle controls should fall within the range of 50 - 170 x 10E-6 colonies.
- The positive controls should yield an absolute increase in total MF that is an increase above the spontaneous background MF (an induced MF [IMF]) of at least 300 x 10E-6 colonies. The small colony MF should account for at least 40% of that IMF, means a small colony IMF of at least 120 x 10E-6 colonies. Alternatively, the positive controls should induce at least 150 small colonies. The upper limit of cytotoxicity observed in the positive controls should have a relative total growth (RTG) that is greater than 10%.
- The highest applied concentration of the test substance should be 5 mg/mL, 5 μL/mL or 10 mM, unless limited by cytotoxicity or solubility of the test substance. If toxicity occurs, the highest concentration should lower the cloning efficiency 1 (CE1) or the relative total growth (RTG) to 10 to 20% of survival. If precipitation occurs, the highest evaluated concentration should be the lowest concentration where precipitation is observed by the unaided eye.
Mutagenicity criteria:
- MF exceeds a threshold of 126 mutant colonies per 10exp6 cells above the concurrent negative/vehicle control value.
- Evidence of reproducibility of any increase in mutant frequencies
- A statistically significant dose-related increase in mutant frequencies - Statistics:
- An appropriate statistical trend test (SAS procedure PROC REG; 9) was performed to assess a possible dose-related increase of mutant frequencies. The number of mutant colonies obtained for the test substance treated groups was compared with that of the respective negative/vehicle control groups. A trend was judged as statistically significant whenever the p-value (probability value) was below 0.10 and the slope was greater than 0.
However, both, biological and statistical significance has been considered together.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: pH value was not influenced by test substance treatment.
- Effects of osmolality: Osmolarity was not influenced by test substance treatment.
- Precipitation: was found from 4µg/plate onwards
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: In both experiments, no cytotoxic effects indicated by reduced cloning efficiencies or reduced relative total growth of below 20% of control were observed neither in the presence nor in the absence of S9 mix. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
According to the results of the present in vitro study, the test substance did not lead to a relevant increase in the number of mutant colonies either without S9 mix or after the addition of a metabolizing system in two experiments performed independently of each other. The mutant frequencies at any concentration were close to the range of the concurrent negative control values and within the range of our recent negative control data set.
Unfortunately, not all acceptance criteria mentioned were fully fulfilled. In the 1st Experiment in the absence of S9 mix the absolute cloning efficiency of the vehicle control determined at the time of mutant selection (CE2) was slightly higher than the proposed upper border of 120% as recommended by IWGT. However, due to missing cytotoxicity and the fact that dose selection was based on the solubility properties of the test substance this finding has no impact on the outcome of this experiment. In addition, either in the 1st Experiment or in the 2nd Experiment in the absence of metabolic activation the corrected mutation frequencies of the vehicle controls (35.7 x 10E-6 colonies or 46.6 x 10E-6 colonies, respectively) were slightly lower than proposed by IWGT (50 – 170 x 10E-6 colonies). However, the mutation frequencies of the vehicle control groups were clearly within our laboratory’s historical negative control data range and, thus, these observations have to be regarded as irrelevant.
Finally, it has to be considered that the minor deviations from the criteria of acceptance described above have no detrimental impact on the validity of this study. The increase in the frequencies of mutant colonies induced by the positive control substances MMS and CPP clearly demonstrated the sensitivity of the test method and of the metabolic activity of the S9 mix employed. The values were within or above the range of the historical positive control data and, thus, fulfilled the acceptance criteria of this study.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.