Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Biodegradation in water: screening tests

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Description of key information

QSARs models, Biowin v4.10 and CATALOGIC Kinetic 301F v.11.14, WoE, validity 2:
Not readily biodegradable

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Biodegradation in water:
under test conditions no biodegradation observed

Additional information

To assess the ready biodegradability of the registered substance, no experimental studies were performed but estimated data were obtained from two reliable QSAR models and were used in a weight of evidence approach.

The first model used is Biowin v4.10, plug-in from EPISUITE v4.1 from US EPA. This model is recommended by the ECHA guidance document on information requirements and is well documented with regard to validation parameters according to OECD principles. Moreover, the substance is fully characterised towards the applicability domain. The Biowin 3 result is "weeks" but the Biowin 5 probability is less than 0.5; therefore the prediction is not readily biodegradable. In addition, Biowin 6 also predict not readily biodegradable, corresponding to a degradation in the OECD 301C test. In conclusion, it's expected that the substance is not readily biodegradable.

The second model is CATALOGIC Kinetic 301F v.11.14, plug-in from OASIS CATALOGIC v.5.11.15. This model is well documented with regard to validation parameters according to OECD principles. Moreover, the substance is fully characterised towards the applicability domain. According to the results of this prediction (Biological Oxygen Demand, BOD (28d) = 0.03), the substance is also expected to be not readily biodegradable in the OECD 301F test conditions.

In conclusion, based on the same predictions obtained between these two QSAR models, the registered substance can be considered as not readily biodegradable.