Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: comparable to guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1979
Report date:
1979

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 401 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Principles of method if other than guideline:
In principle, the methods described in OECD Guideline 401 were used.
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
3-methyl-2-butenal
EC Number:
203-527-6
EC Name:
3-methyl-2-butenal
Cas Number:
107-86-8
Molecular formula:
C5H8O
IUPAC Name:
3-methyl-2-butenal
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 3-Methyl-2-butenal
- Analytical purity: ca. 98%

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: WIGA
- Weight at study initiation: mean group body weight range: males 190-260 g; females 160-190 g
- Fasting period before study: 15-20 hrs
- Diet: Herilan MRH-Haltung; Eggersmann KG
- Water: ad libitum



Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 3.16; 4.64; 5.62; 6.81; 8.25; 10.00 %

MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 ml/kg
Doses:
316, 464, 562, 681, 825, 1000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations: 0, 15, 30 min, 1, 2, 4, 5 hours, day 1, daily thereafter on working days
- Frequency of weighing: day 0, 4 (except 562 mg/kg dosing group: weighing on day 3), 7, 13
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight,organ weights, histopathology
Statistics:
Model of Dose-Response-Relationship: F (P) = A+B* LN (D) with: D=dose; P=frequency of occurrence of death animals upon treatment with D; F= inverse function of the cumulative standardised normal distribution; LN=natural logarithm ; A+B= parameters of the model;

Test on homogeneity: chi-square test

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
690 mg/kg bw
Mortality:
Deaths occurred within 1 hr at 1000 mg/kg bw and 681 mg/kg bw or within 1 d after doses of 562, 681, 825 mg/kg bw. Mortalities were as follows: 0/10 animals at 316 or 464 mg/kg bw; 2/10 animals at 562 mg/kg bw; 3/10 animals at 681 mg/kg bw; 9/10 animals at 825 mg/kg bw; 10/10 animals at 1000 mg/kg bw.
Clinical signs:
other: dyspnoea; gasping; apathia; abnormal lateral position; staggering; tremor; muscle-twitching; spastic movement; saltation convulsions; trismus; tonic convulsions; scrubby coat; erythema; cyanosis; salivation; lacrimation; disturbance of equilibrium; poor g
Gross pathology:
deceased animals: heart: acute dilatation (both organ sites), acute congestive hyperemia; liver: peripheral injections of liver lobes (peripheral lobular pattern); stomach: proventriculus reddened; gastroesophageal vestibule:enhanced intravascular injection;
sacrificed animals: Stomach: esophageal vestibule wall thickened; development of gnathions; local adhesions of esophageal vestibule with liver, peritoneum and spleen

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
harmful
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU