Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
03 – 25 Sep. 2007
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2007
Report date:
2007

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Distillates (coal tar), heavy oils
EC Number:
292-607-4
EC Name:
Distillates (coal tar), heavy oils
Cas Number:
90640-86-1
IUPAC Name:
90640-86-1
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): anthracene oil (> 50 ppm BaP)
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): not applicable
- Molecular weight (if other than submission substance): not applicable
- Substance type: organic
- Physical state: liquid
- Stability under test conditions: WAF (water accommodated fraction) limited
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature, exclusion of light

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Samples for TOC-analysis were taken at 0 h and 72 h (TOC-Analyser (DIMA-TOC 100).
Measurements of the cell concentrations per mL: at time 24 h, 48 h and 72 h by optical densitometry at 525 nm

Test solutions

Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: Water Accommodated Fractions (WAFs) prepared by stirring various amounts of the test item in Alga-medium
for 24 h with magnetic stirrers (open conditions). The WAFs were prepared in 2-L glass beakers.
The beakers were equipped with a glass tube that allowed the separation of the water phase by siphoning.
The test loading rates of Anthracene oil were weighed on microscope slides, that afterwards were placed into the glass beakers.
The beakers were then filled with Alga-medium.
Mixing was carried out at a speed that was slow enough not to cause dispersion or emulsification of the undissolved fraction
of the test item. To ensure this, the vortex developed at the surface by stirring was set at ~ 10 % of the water depth.
After stirring for 24 h the WAFs were allowed to stand for 1 h before use to facilitate phase separation.
The extracts gained with this method were clear.

- Pre-conditioning: The test vessels of the Definite Alga-Test were rinsed with control media and WAFs for ca. 0.5 h before the definite
start of the tests to facilitate adsorption of the test item to the glass walls of the beakers.
Control media and WAFs were then discarded, and the test vessels were refilled again with control media and WAFs, respectively.
- Differential loading: control, 25 mg/L, 50 mg/L, 100 mg/L, 250 mg/L, and 500 mg/L
- Controls: without test material (blank; Alga medium)
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): none
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): no

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: unicellular green alga
- Strain: : SAG 86.81
- Source: Albrecht von Haller Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften der Universität Göttingen

- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): ca. 72 h
[Pre-culture: Incubation in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks at ± 25 °C on a shaker
(80 - 120 rpm), ca. 72 h, ca. 10000 lux (Gro-Lux fluorescent tubes), permanent illumination]

- Method of cultivation: Sterile on agar tubes (OECD-Medium, 0.8 % Agar), transferred to a new agar tube every 2 months


Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Post exposure observation period:
none

Test conditions

Hardness:
no data specified: Compositions of stock solutions given.
Test temperature:
23.5 - 24.3 °C (25 +-2°C)
pH:
initial (with algae): 8.0
final (with algae): 10.5 (control); 9.9 (25 mg/L); 9.1 (50 mg/L); 8.8 (100 mg/L); 8.4 (250 mg/L); 8.3 (500 mg/L)
Salinity:
no data specified: Compositions of stock solutions given.
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Time [h] Control 25 mg/L 100 mg/L 500 mg/L loading
=====================================================
0 0.9 4.4 5.1 8.3 mgC/mL (TOC of WAFs)
72 1.9 3.1 3.7 6.4 mgC/mL (TOC of WAFs)
=====================================================

The oil-related TOC was about 3.5 - 4.5 mg C/L for 25 - 100 mg oil/L and 7.0 - 7.5 mg C/L for 500 mg oil/L.
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL-Erlenmeyer
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 100 mL
- Aeration: no
- Initial cells density: approx. 5000 cells/ml
- Control end cells density: approx. 210200 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 3



GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes


TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: reconstituted from deionised water and mineral stock solutions


OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: permanent
- Light intensity and quality: approx. 10000 Lux (Gro-Lux fluorescent tubes)


EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
- Determination of cell concentrations: densitometrically at 525 nm (turbidity)
- Chlorophyll measurement: no


TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 2 and 2.5 (-> 250 mg/L)
- Range finding study
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: based on results from daphnia test

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOELR
Effect conc.:
<= 25 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOELR
Effect conc.:
< 25 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
LOELR
Effect conc.:
50 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: growth rate and biomass (cell yield)
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
48 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
37 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL100
Effect conc.:
>= 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
biomass
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: at 72 h at 25 mg/L
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: no

- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): by microscopy at the end of the testing period of 72 h:

Control: Appearance of alga cells was normal, cell proliferations could be observed regularly.
25 mg/L: Comparable to control.
50 mg/L: Appearance of alga cells and cell proliferations comparable to control, lower number of cells
100 mg/L: Appearance of alga cells was normal, lower number of cells, cell proliferations could not be observed.
250 mg/L: Alga cells were slightly deformed, very low number of cells, cell proliferations could not be observed.
500 mg/L: Comparable to 250 mg/L

Reported statistics and error estimates:
No data: due to high fluctuation of cell number in single replicate tests at the low concentrations statistics were not considered reasonable and reliable.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Growth rates are listed below, from 0 -24, 24 - 48, and 48 - 72 h (Table 1) and average from 0 - 72 h (Table 2):

Note: At 25 mg/L), there is obviously an initial inhibition from 0 - 48 h, which appears to be largely compensated in the the last growth period from 48 - 72 h (see cell density and growth rate Tab. 1, 72 h).

Table 1: Loading rates of the Test item, cells/mL in the test flasks at 24, 48 and 72 h with mean value,

section-by-section average specific growth rate [μ] during observation times 0-24 h, 24-48 h

and 48-72 h, mean value of the average specific growth rate [μ], standard deviation and

coefficient of variation Vc [%], inhibition [%] and mean value of inhibition of the average

specific growth rate [%] during observation times 0-24 h, 24-48 h and 48-72 h (Rep. Tab. 3)

[Note: Negative inhibition means increased growth, apparently stimulation]

Loading rate

[mg/L]

Cells / mL

Cells / mL

Mean value

Average Specific

growth rate

[µ]

Average Specific

growth rate

[µ]

Mean value

Standard deviation

Coefficient of variation Vc [%]

Inhibition of Average Specific
growth rate

[%]

Inhibition of Average Specific

growth rate

Mean value

[%]

24 h

Control 1

18746

19836

1.32

1.38

0.09

6.75

Control 2

22015

1.48

Control 3

18746

1.32

25

15518

13394

1.13

0.98

0.13

13.6

17.6

28.8

25

12332

0.90

34.4

25

12332

0.90

34.4

50

12332

10236

0.90

0.71

0.17

24.2

34.4

48.6

50

9187

0.61

55.8

50

9187

0.61

55.8

100

6083

7118

0.20

0.33

0.24

71.4

85.7

75.7

100

6083

0.20

85.7

100

9187

0.61

55.8

250

3021

3021

0.00 *

0.00

0.00

0.00

100

100

250

3021

0.00 *

100

250

3021

0.00 *

100

500

3021

3021

0.00 *

0.00

0.00

0.00

100

100

500

3021

0.00 *

100

500

3021

0.00 *

100

Loading rate

[mg/L]

Cells / mL

Cells / mL

Mean value

Average Specific

growth rate

[µ]

Average Specific

growth rate

[µ]

Mean value

Standard deviation

Coefficient of variation Vc [%]

Inhibition of Average Specific
growth rate

[%]

Inhibition of Average Specific

growth rate

Mean value

[%]

48 h

Control 1

60698

61953

1.17

1.14

0.11

10.0

Control 2

60698

1.01

Control 3

64463

1.24

25

46053

44895

1.09

1.21

0.16

13.3

4.70

- 6.1

25

38979

1.15

-0.82

25

49653

1.39

-22.0

50

15518

12346

0.23

0.17

0.15

88.6

79.9

84.7

50

12332

0.29

74.2

50

9187

0.00

100

100

9187

10236

0.41

0.37

0.07

18.2

63.9

67.3

100

9187

0.41

63.9

100

12332

0.29

74.2

250

9187

8153

1.11

0.97

0.24

24.4

2.56

14.6

250

6083

0.70

38.7

250

9187

1.11

2.56

500

3021

3021

0.00 *

0.00

0.00

0.00

100

100

500

3021

0.00 *

100

500

3021

0.00 *

100

Loading rate

[mg/L]

Cells / mL

Cells / mL

Mean value

Average Specific

growth rate

[µ]

Average Specific

growth rate

[µ]

Mean value

Standard deviation

Coefficient of variation Vc [%]

Inhibition of Average Specific
growth rate

[%]

Inhibition of Average Specific

growth rate

Mean value

[%]

72 h

Control 1

222237

210232

1.30

1.22

0.07

5.48

Control 2

196601

1.18

Control 3

211859

1.19

25

206731

201824

1.50

1.51

0.03

2.15

-23.0

- 23.3

25

181714

1.54

-26.1

25

217027

1.47

-20.8

50

38979

29876

0.92

0.88

0.15

17.0

24.6

27.5

50

25325

0.72

41.1

50

25325

1.01

17.0

100

12332

12332

0.29

0.20

0.17

86.6

75.9

83.9

100

12332

0.29

75.9

100

12332

0.00

100

250

12332

10236

0.29

0.24

0.21

90.1

75.9

80.7

250

9187

0.41

66.2

250

9187

0.00

100

500

3021

3021

0.00 *

0.00

0.00

0.00

100

100

500

3021

0.00 *

100

500

3021

0.00 *

100

* The measurements of the cell number by optical densitometry at 525 nm gave values quite below the initial cell concentration of 5000 cells/mL.

Because of the uncertainty of the measurements in this lower absorbance range, the average specific growth rate [µ] has been assigned zero.

Table 2: Loading rate of the Test item, cells/mL in the test flasks at 72 h, average specific growth

rate [μ] over the whole testing period 0-72 h, mean value of the average specific growth

rate [μ], standard deviation and coefficient of variation Vc [%], inhibition [%] and mean value

of inhibition [%] of the average specific growth rate [μ] (Rep. Tab. 4)

Loading rate

[mg/L]

Cells / mL

Average

Specific

growth rate

[µ]

Average

Specific

growth rate

[µ]

Mean value

Standard deviation

Coefficient of variation

Vc [%]

Inhibition of Average

Specific

growth rate

[%]

Inhibition of Average

Specific

growth rate

Mean value

[%]

72 h

Control 1

222237

1.26

1.25

0.02

1.65

Control 2

196601

1.22

Control 3

211859

1.25

25

206731

1.24

1.23

0.03

2.48

0.42

1.1

25

181714

1.20

3.87

25

217027

1.26

-0.88

50

38979

0.68

0.59

0.08

14.1

45.1

52.8

50

25325

0.54

56.6

50

25325

0.54

56.6

100

12332

0.30

0.30

0.00

0.00

75.9

75.9

100

12332

0.30

75.9

100

12332

0.30

75.9

250

12332

0.30

0.24

0.06

24.1

75.9

81.1

250

9187

0.20

83.7

250

9187

0.20

83.7

500

3021

0.00 *

0.00

0.00

0.00

100

100

500

3021

0.00 *

100

500

3021

0.00 *

100

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
1) Biomass in controls increased 42x in 72 h (nom. >= 16x). 2) Mean var-coeff. for section-spec. growth rates: 10.3 % (nom. ≤ 35%). 3) Var-coeff. of av. spec. growth rates for the whole period in replicate controls: 1.7% (nom. value ≤ 7%).