Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation, other
Remarks:
other: BCOP in-vitro method as detailed below.
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
Februry 2011
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Test carried out by GLP compliant laboratory to recognised validated methods by trained personnel

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011
Report date:
2011

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Determination of Eye Irritation Potential using Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) Assay. OECD Guideline 437 (2009)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Silicate(2-), hexafluoro-, disodium, reaction products with lithium magnesium sodium silicate
EC Number:
285-349-9
EC Name:
Silicate(2-), hexafluoro-, disodium, reaction products with lithium magnesium sodium silicate
Cas Number:
85085-18-3
Molecular formula:
Na0.7[Mg5.3Li0.7Si8O20(OH)0.0F4.0]
IUPAC Name:
Synthetic fluorohectorite
Details on test material:
Batch 09-2151-1
White solid - powder

Test system

Vehicle:
physiological saline
Remarks:
20% dilution
Amount / concentration applied:
20% w/v solution in 0.9% w.v sodium chloride solution
Duration of treatment / exposure:
240 minutes

Results and discussion

In vivo

Results
Irritation parameter:
maximum mean total score (MMTS)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
other: 4 hours
Score:
< 2
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: In vitro study
Irritant / corrosive response data:
In vitro scores were as follows:
-Ve control (saline solution) = 1.2
+Ve control (known irritant = imidazole) = 110.1
Test Item = 1.1
Other effects:
No other effects observed

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Based on the in vitro test results for the effect of this substance on bovine corneal opacity and permeability, the score results were of the same order as the -ve control used (saline solution) i.e. ~ 1.0 and thus deemed to be not irritating to eyes. (An In Vitro irritancy score of >55.1 would need to be achieved before a material would be classed as an ocular corrosive or severe irritant).
Whilst in-vitro tests may not be as conclusive as in-vivo testing, there is sufficient evidence based on in-vivo tests that have been carried out on
Laponite type 2 ( a read-across substance of virtually identical composition and structure) and also from the fact that no ocular issues have been reported during 40+ years of manufacturing and handling this material, that there is no justification for carrying out new in-vivo tests.
Executive summary:

Laponite type 1 is not an ocular corrosive or severe irritant. No classification necessary.