Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 220-036-2 | CAS number: 2611-82-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Micronucleus tests in m9ice on 39 food additives and eight miscellaneous chemicals
- Author:
- Hayashi M. et al.
- Year:
- 1 988
- Bibliographic source:
- Fd Chem. Toxic. 26(6), pp. 487-500
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- In vivo micronucleus assay in mouse by intraperitoneal route by single or repeated (4 times at 24 h interval) exposure.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- other: vivo micronucleus assay in mouse by intraperitoneal route
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Acid Red 018
- IUPAC Name:
- Acid Red 018
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: ddY
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 8-week old
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- intraperitoneal
- Vehicle:
- Saline
- Details on exposure:
- Intaperitoneal route:
- single injection
- 4 injections at 24-hour interval between injections - Frequency of treatment:
- Single dose or 4 doses at 24-hour interval.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- no. of dose: 1
sampling time: 24 h
- Dose / conc.:
- 600 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- no. of dose: 1
sampling time: 24 h
- Dose / conc.:
- 1 200 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- no. of dose: 1
sampling time: 24 h
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 400 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- no. of dose: 1
sampling time: 24 h
- Dose / conc.:
- 300 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Remarks:
- no. of dose: 4
time between doses: 24 h
sampling time: 24 h
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- - Substance: mitomycin C
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal
- Doses / concentrations: 2 mg/kg
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Femoral marrow cells
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: maximum dose levels set at the supposed maximum tolerated dose referring to LD50
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Femoral marrow cells were flushed out with foetal bovine serum and smeared on clean glass slides. Cells were mixed with methanol for 5 min. and stained with Giemsa.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: preparations were coded and analysed without any knowledge of the treatment. 1000 polychromatic erythrocytes per mouse were scored using a light microscope, with a high power objective (× 100) and the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCEs) was recorded. The portion of polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) among the total erythrocytes was also evaluated by observing 1000 erythrocytes on the same slide.
- Statistics:
- Before evaluating the test data statistically, the frequencies of MNPCEs in concurrent negative and positive control groups were compared with the control charts of our historical data to confirm the technical validity of the experiment. To estimate the true spontaneous level, it should be more reliable to use historical control data instead of the results from concurrent controls which could fluctuate.
According to the historical negative control data, the number of MNPCEs per mouse followed binomial distributions with P = 0.00209 and n = 1000 (laboratory
1) and P = 0.00200 and n = 1000 (laboratory 2).
A two-stage statistical procedure was used. In the first step of the procedure, the frequency of MNPCEs in each treatment group was compared with the binomial distribution specified by historical control data from the laboratory (1 or 2).
In the second step, the dose-response relationship was tested by the Cochran-Armitage trend test. A positive result was recorded only when one or more treatment group(s) showed a statistically significant difference (P < 0.01) from the spontaneous level of MNPCEs and the trend test indicated a positive dose response (P < 0.05). This procedure was not applied to tests with multiple treatments which, in most cases, contained only one dose group. Such data were evaluated statistically using the first step only.
A Monte-Carlo simulation study showed that the probability of a type I error (the probability of a false positive), in this two-step procedure was, in general, closer to the nominal significance level (P = 0.01) than that of the usual conditional binomial test which has been widely used to evaluate micronucleus test data.
Similarly, this method was a more powerful method of analysis than the conditional binomial test. A detailed description of this statistical procedure will be reported separately.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Any other information on results incl. tables
Test compound was found to be negative after single treatment, thus it was assayed by the multiple treatement at the maximum tolerated dose expected from the single treatment test. None of the treatments (4 doses) showed a significant induction of micronuclei when compared with historical control data.
dose mg/kg | MNPCE (%) | PCE (%) | mortality | trend test | |
test substance (single dose) | 0 | 0.27 ± 0.08 | 62.8 ± 6.7 | 0/6 | not significant |
300 | 0.13 ± 0.08 | 59.6 ± 3.4 | 0/6 | ||
600 | 0.26 ± 0.23 | 62.4 ± 8.6 | 1/6 | ||
1200 | 0.18 ± 0.16 | 54.2 ± 10.8 | 0/6 | ||
2400 | 0.1 | 43.4 | 5/6 | ||
mitomycin C | 2 | 6.15 ± 1.70* | 43.5 ± 5.2 | 0/6 | |
test substance (4 doses at 24 h interval) | 300 | 0.18 ± 0.15 | 54.3 ± 7.8 | 0/6 |
* significantly different from historical control
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Non mutagenic.
- Executive summary:
Method
In vivo micronucleus test in mouse. Test substance in saline vehicle was given to groups of 6 male mice per dose by intraperitoneal route. Single injection at doses of 0 (negative control), 300, 600, 1200 and 2400 mg/kg was done, followed by sampling after 24 hours. Four injections at 24 -hour interval were done at dose of 300 mg/kg. Mitomycin C 2 mg/kg was used as positive control. Mortality, percentage of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes (MNPCE) and polychromatic erythrocytes (PCE) were recorded.
Results
Mortality was recorded starting at dose of 600 mg/kg. MNPCE (%) and PCE (%) did not significantly differ from controls. No significant induction of micronuclei was noted either upon single or repeated treatment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.