Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 939-654-5 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
For details please refer to Read Across Justification Document, Section 13.2
2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
For details please refer to Read Across Justification Document, Section 13.2
3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
For details please refer to Read Across Justification Document, Section 13.2
4. DATA MATRIX
For details please refer to Read Across Justification Document, Section 13.2 - Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 5.1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Remarks:
- based on measurement of C12 constituent
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 5.1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Remarks:
- based on measurement of C12 constituent
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 5.1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Remarks:
- C12
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 5.1 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Remarks:
- based on measurement of C12 constituent
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- > 3.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Remarks:
- based on measurement of C14 constituent
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 3.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Remarks:
- based on measurement of C14 constituent
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Key result
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 3.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Remarks:
- based on measurement of C14 constituent
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 3.6 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (geom. mean)
- Conc. based on:
- act. ingr.
- Remarks:
- based on measurement of C14 constituent
- Basis for effect:
- growth
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities:
- Observations on body length and weight: see table below
- Other biological observations: none
- Mortality of control: 10%
- Other adverse effects control: no
- Abnormal responses: none
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: none
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: no - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- See "Any other information on materials and methods" (above).
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The overall NOEC and EC10 were > 3.6 mg a.i./L and 3.6 mg/L respectively.
- Executive summary:
In the Klimisch 1 study from Minderhout (2018) the cladoceran,Daphnia magna,was exposed to the aqueous solution of butanedioic acid, 2 (or 3)-sulfo-, 4-[2-[(1-oxo (C12-C18 (Even Numbered) and C18 unsaturated)alkyl))amino]ethyl]esters, disodium salts,at time-weighted mean measured concentrations of 0.092, 0.18, 0.42, 1.4 and 5.1 mg a.i/L based on C12 component and from 0.091, 0.18, 0.40, 0.97 and 3.6 mg a.i./L based on C14 component under semi-static conditions for 21 days. There were no statistically significant treatment-related effects on survival, reproduction or growth at concentrations ≤5.1 mg a.i./L based on C12 component or ≤3.6 mg a.i./L based on C14 component of the test item.
As worst case, the concentrations based on the measured C14 constituent were used for the risk assessment., i.e., the overall NOEC and EC10 were > 3.6 mg a.i./L and 3.6 mg/L respectively.
The results for the source substance are considered to be relevant for the target substance as well and no additional factor is needed.
The results of this study are considered relevant and reliable for the risk assessment.
Reference
The cladoceran,Daphnia magna,was exposed to the test substance, the aqueous solution of butanedioicacid, 2 (or 3)-sulfo-, 4-[2-[(1-oxo (C12-C18 (Even Numbered) and C18 unsaturated)alkyl))amino]ethyl]esters, disodium salts,at time-weighted mean measured concentrations of 0.092, 0.18, 0.42, 1.4 and 5.1 mg a.i/L based on C12 component and from 0.091, 0.18, 0.40, 0.97 and 3.6 mg a.i./L based on C14 component under semi-static conditions for 21 days. There were no statistically significant treatment-related effects on survival, reproduction or growth at concentrations ≤5.1 mg a.i./L based on C12 component or ≤3.6 mg a.i./L based on C14 component of the test item. Consequently, the NOEC, LOEC and EC10, EC50and the corresponding 95% confidence interval were as follows:
|
Survival |
Reproduction (mean number of live neonates) |
Length |
Dry Weight |
|
Per Surviving Adult |
Per Adult at Start |
||||
Based on time-weighted mean measured concentration of C12 component (mg a.i./L)1 |
|
|
|
|
|
EC10& 95% confidence interval |
-- |
>5.1 (NA) |
>5.1 (NA) |
-- |
-- |
EC50& 95% confidence interval |
>5.1 (NA) |
>5.1 (NA) |
>5.1 (NA) |
-- |
-- |
NOEC |
5.1 |
5.1 |
5.1 |
5.1 |
5.1 |
LOEC |
>5.1 |
>5.1 |
>5.1 |
>5.1 |
>5.1 |
Based on time-weighted mean measured concentration of C14 component (mg a.i./L)1 |
|
|
|
|
|
EC10& 95% confidence interval |
-- |
>3.6 (NA) |
>3.6 (NA) |
-- |
-- |
EC50& 95% confidence interval |
>3.6 (NA) |
>3.6 (NA) |
>3.6 (NA) |
-- |
-- |
NOEC |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
3.6 |
LOEC |
>3.6 |
>3.6 |
>3.6 |
>3.6 |
>3.6 |
1 Mean measured test concentrations were calculated using time-weight average as described in OECD 211, Annex 6.
NA = Not applicable; the 95% confidence intervals were overly wide or outside of the data range used for the calculation.
-- = not estimated as it was not required.
Summary of Survival, Reproduction and Growth of Daphnia magna Exposed to the Test Item for 21 Days
Nominal Test Concentration (mg a.i./L) |
Time-Weighted Mean Measured Concentration (mg a.i./L) |
Percent Adult Survival1 |
Mean No. Neonates Per Surviving Adult (# Surviving Adults) ± Std. Dev.1,3 |
Mean No. Neonates Per Adult at Start (# Surviving Adults) ± Std. Dev.2 |
Mean Length ± Std. Dev. (mm)1 |
Mean Dry Weight ± Std. Dev. (mg)1 |
|
C12 |
C14 |
||||||
Negative Control |
Negative Control |
Negative Control |
90
|
169 ± 25.1 (n=18) (CV = 14.9%) |
155 ± 48.4
|
5.1 ± 0.14
|
1.06 ± 0.21
|
0.13 |
0.092 |
0.091 |
60 |
160 ± 22.0 (n=6) |
145 ± 50.0 |
5.0 ± 0.16 |
1.03 ± 0.17 |
0.42 |
0.18 |
0.18 |
80 |
176 ± 14.4 (n=8) |
152 ± 52.2 |
5.0 ± 0.14 |
0.95 ± 0.19 |
1.3 |
0.42 |
0.40 |
70 |
180 ± 28.4 (n=7) |
137 ± 76.9 |
5.0 ± 0.22 |
0.97 ± 0.27 |
3.8 |
1.4 |
0.97 |
90 |
167 ± 17.7 (n=9) |
163 ± 21.1 |
4.9 ± 0.17 |
1.09 ± 0.21 |
12 |
5.1 |
3.6 |
70 |
166 ± 31.9 (n=7) |
128 ± 69.9 |
4.9 ± 0.16 |
1.06 ± 0.11 |
1 There were no statistically significant differences from the control (Fisher Exact test, p> 0.05 for survival and Dunnett’s one-tailed test, p > 0.05 for mean number of neonates per surviving adult and growth). 2 There were no statistically significant differences from the control (Jonckheere-Terpstra step down trend test, p > 0.05). 3 There were total of 15, 8, 6, 8, 6 and 7 immobile neonates produced and total of 14, 28, 11, 10, 6 and 9 aborted/shed eggs produced by surviving adults in the negative control, 0.13, 0.42, 1.3, 3.8 and 12 mg a.i./L nominal test concentrations, respectively. These were production of immobile neonates and aborted/shed eggs not considered to be treatment related effect. |
The results for the source substance are considered to be relevant for the target substance as well and no additional factor is needed.
Description of key information
The overall NOEC and EC10 were > 3.6 mg a.i./L and 3.6 mg/L respectively.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Effect concentration:
- 3.6 mg/L
Additional information
In the Klimisch 1 study from Minderhout (2018) the cladoceran,Daphnia magna,was exposed to the aqueous solution of butanedioic acid, 2 (or 3)-sulfo-, 4-[2-[(1-oxo (C12-C18 (Even Numbered) and C18 unsaturated)alkyl))amino]ethyl]esters, disodium salts,at time-weighted mean measured concentrations of 0.092, 0.18, 0.42, 1.4 and 5.1 mg a.i/L based on C12 component and from 0.091, 0.18, 0.40, 0.97 and 3.6 mg a.i./L based on C14 component under semi-static conditions for 21 days. There were no statistically significant treatment-related effects on survival, reproduction or growth at concentrations ≤5.1 mg a.i./L based on C12 component or ≤3.6 mg a.i./L based on C14 component of the test item. As worst case, the concentrations based on the measured C14 constituent were used for the risk assessment., i.e., the overall NOEC and EC10 were > 3.6 mg a.i./L and 3.6 mg/L respectively. The results for the source substance are considered to be relevant for the target substance as well and no additional factor is needed. The results of this study are considered relevant and reliable for the risk assessment.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.