Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-015-6 | CAS number: 505-65-7
Toxicological information
Skin irritation / corrosion
Currently viewing:
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1968
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- - The test performance was similar to OECD guideline, however with few deviations (occlusive test conditions, 1ml test substance applied, exposure periods of 1, 5, 15 minutes and 20 hours, additionally testing of the ear) that did not affect the validity of the results for assessment. - The study is scientifically acceptable.
Data source
Referenceopen allclose all
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 968
- Report date:
- 1968
- Reference Type:
- other: Translation of original German report dated 1968-10-21
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 984
- Report date:
- 1984
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Version / remarks:
- (adopted 2002)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- , occlusive test conditions, 1ml test substance applied, exposure periods of 1, 5,15 minutes and 20 hours, additionally testing of the ear.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- ; GLP was not compulsory at the time the study was conducted.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,3-dioxepane
- EC Number:
- 208-015-6
- EC Name:
- 1,3-dioxepane
- Cas Number:
- 505-65-7
- Molecular formula:
- C5H10O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,3-dioxepane
- Details on test material:
- Butandiolformal (1,3-Dioxacycloheptane)
Purity 99.99%
Physical state: liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- Vienna White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- - Designation: no data
- Source: no data
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation:
Animal 1: 2.55 kg
Animal 2: 3.08 kg
Animal 3: 2.90 kg
Animal 4: 2.90 kg
- Housing: no data
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): no data
- Acclimation period: no data
Test system
- Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- other: clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- no
- Amount / concentration applied:
- ca. 1 ml
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1, 5 and 15 min, 20h
- Observation period:
- 8 days
- Number of animals:
- One animal (animal 1) received dorsal applications of test substance for 1, 5, 15 minutes and for 20 hours, and a 20 hour application on the ear;
One animal (animal 2) received dorsal applications of test substance for 1, 5, 15 minutes and for 20 hours, and a 20 hour application on the ear;
One animal (animal 3) received dorsal application of test substance for 20 hours, and a 20 hour application on the ear;
One animal (animal 4) received dorsal application of test substance for 20 hours, and a 20 hour application on the ear; - Details on study design:
- Skin irritation was tested using an internal method (BASF test). The test substance was applied unchanged on the backs of 2 animals for 1, 5 and 15 minutes. The application sites were rinsed with Lutrol and Lutrol in water 1:1. The test substance was also applied for 20 hours on the back of two other animals, without rinsing. Each animals further received a 20 hour application on the ear, without rinsing.
The animals were observed for 8 days and skin changes were recorded. Scoring was perfomed at following time points: 24h, 48h, 72h, day 6, and day 8
Results and discussion
In vivo
Resultsopen allclose all
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0.66
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 6 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: (20 hour dorsal application)
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1.66
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 6 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: (20 hour dorsal application)
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 6 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: (20 hour dorsal application)
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 6 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: (20 hour dorsal application)
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: (20 hour dorsal application)
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 1
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 6 days
- Remarks on result:
- other: (20 hour dorsal application)
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: (20 hour dorsal application)
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #4
- Time point:
- other: Mean of 24, 48 and 72 hours
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Remarks on result:
- other: (20 hour dorsal application)
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- ANIMAL 1:
Dorsal application for 1, 5, 15 minutes: no effects were seen
Dorsal application for 20 hours: questionable redness seen after 24 and 48 hours; replaced by fine scaling after 72 hours, no more effects at day 6, no edema.
ANIMAL 2:
Dorsal application for 1, 5, 15 minutes: on all 3 application sites, questionable erythema was seen after 24 hours, but no edema. On the 1 min. application site, no more effects were seen after 48 hours. On the 5 min. application site, questionable erythema lasted for 72 hours and was no more seen thereafter; no edema. On the 15 min. application site, questionable erythema lasted for 72 hours; at time point 72 hours, fine scaling was seen, that lasted until day 6; no edema.
Dorsal application for 20 hours: questionable redness was seen after 24 hours, which turned to well-defined after 48 hours and lasted until 72 hours. Redness was accompanied by slight edema (24 to 72 hours). The findings were no more evident from day 6.
ANIMAL 3:
Dorsal application for 20 hours: questionable erythema lasting for 72 hours was reported, but no edema.
ANIMAL 4:
Dorsal application for 20 hours: questionable erythema lasting for 72 hours was reported, but no edema. - Other effects:
- ANIMAL 1:
Ear application for 20 hours: moderate to severe redness, necrosis, open, bloody blebs seen after 24 hours, until day 8.
ANIMAL 2:
Ear application for 20 hours: open, bloody blebs seen after 24 hours, until day 8.
ANIMAL 3:
Ear application for 20 hours: questionable redness, necrosis and partly open blebs seen after 24 hours, until day 6.
ANIMAL 4:
Ear application for 20 hours: questionable redness, necrosis and partly open blebs seen after 24 hours, until day 6.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
