Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-362-1 | CAS number: 58-08-2
Density
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- relative density
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: peer reviewed data base
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- secondary source
- Title:
- The Merck Index
- Author:
- O'Neil, M.J.
- Year:
- 2 001
- Bibliographic source:
- Tne Encyclopedia of Chemicals, Drugs, and Biologicals. 13th Edition, Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck and Co., Inc., 275. cited in HSDB 21 Sep 2006
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Guideline:
- other: measured
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method: other
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Caffeine
- EC Number:
- 200-362-1
- EC Name:
- Caffeine
- Cas Number:
- 58-08-2
- Molecular formula:
- C8H10N4O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 1,3,7-trimethyl-3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione
- Details on test material:
- name of test material (as cited in study report): caffeine
Analytical purity: pure
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
Density
- Type:
- relative density
- Density:
- 1.23
- Temp.:
- 18 °C
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
