Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 911-819-6 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicological Summary
- Administrative data
- Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
- Workers - Hazard via dermal route
- Workers - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - workers
- General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
- General Population - Hazard via dermal route
- General Population - Hazard via oral route
- General Population - Hazard for the eyes
- Additional information - General Population
Administrative data
Workers - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 35.3 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 25
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 882 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- In the absence of an inhalation study, a corrected inhalation starting point is derived based on the oral NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d. The oral NOAEL is corrected for breathing rate (/0.38) and activity (*0.67), resulting in a corrected inhalation NOAEC of 882 mg/m3.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from sub-chronic study to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not required: already considered
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default value (workers)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Workers - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 10 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 100
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- A study of repeated dose dermal toxicity is not available. Dermal absorption and oral absorption are assumed (worst case) to be equivalent). A corrected dermal NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d is therefore derived.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from sub-chronic study to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- starting point derived from a rat study
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 5
- Justification:
- default value (workers)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Workers - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - workers
DNEL Derivation
Polyol PX is of low acute toxicity, is not an irritant or sensitiser. An OECD 408 study with Polyol PX reports no effects at the highest (limit) dose level tested of 1000 mg/kg bw/d. A study of developmental toxicity performed with Polyol PX which also reports maternal and developmental NOAELs of 1000 mg/kg bw/d. An overall NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d is therefore used as a PoD for DNEL derivation.
Inhalation DNELs
Systemic inhalation DNELs
In the absence of an inhalation study, a corrected inhalation starting point is derived from the oral NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d. The oral NOAEL is corrected for breathing rate (/0.38) and activity (*0.67), resulting in a corrected inhalation NOAEC of 882 mg/m3.
Applying individual assessment factors of 1 (for dose-response relationship), 2 (for duration of exposure), 1 (for allometric scaling), 2.5 (for other interspecies differences), 5 (for intraspecies differences), 1 (for database quality) and 1 (for remaining uncertainties) results in an overall assessment factor of 25. Applying the overall assessment factor to the corrected starting point results in a DNEL of 35.3 mg/m3.
The substance is of very low acute toxicity. No hazard is identified; a short-term systemic inhalation DNEL is not required.
Local inhalation DNELs
The substance is not classified as a skin or eye irritant and there is no evidence for respiratory irritation or sensitisation. In the absence of an identified hazard, a local inhalation DNEL is not derived.
Dermal DNELs
Systemic dermal DNELs
A study of repeated dose dermal toxicity is not available. Dermal absorption and oral absorption are assumed (worst case) to be equivalent). A corrected dermal NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d is therefore derived. Applying individual assessment factors of 1 (for dose-response relationship), 2 (for duration of exposure), 4 (for allometric scaling), 2.5 (for other interspecies differences), 5 (for intraspecies differences), 1 (for database quality) and 1 (for remaining uncertainties) results in an overall assessment factor of 100. Applying the overall assessment factor to the corrected starting point results in a DNEL of 10 mg/kg bw/d.
The substance is of very low acute toxicity. No hazard is identified; a short-term systemic dermal DNEL is not required.
Local dermal DNELs
The substance is not classified as a skin or eye irritant and there is no evidence for skin irritation or sensitisation. In the absence of an identified hazard, a local dermal DNEL is not derived.
Polyol PX is not classified as an eye irritant.
General Population - Hazard via inhalation route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 8.7 mg/m³
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 50
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEC
- Value:
- 435 mg/m³
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- In the absence of an inhalation study, a corrected inhalation starting point is derived from the oral NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d. The oral NOAEL is corrected for breathing rate (/1.15), resulting in a corrected inhalation NOAEC of 435 mg/m3.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from sub-chronic study to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 1
- Justification:
- not required: already considered
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default value (general population)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard via dermal route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- A study of repeated dose dermal toxicity is not available. Dermal absorption and oral absorption are assumed (worst case) to be equivalent. A corrected dermal NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d is therefore derived.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from a sub-chronic study to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- starting point derived from a rat study
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default value (general population)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
Local effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
General Population - Hazard via oral route
Systemic effects
Long term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- DNEL (Derived No Effect Level)
- Value:
- 5 mg/kg bw/day
- Most sensitive endpoint:
- repeated dose toxicity
- Route of original study:
- Oral
DNEL related information
- DNEL derivation method:
- ECHA REACH Guidance
- Overall assessment factor (AF):
- 200
- Modified dose descriptor starting point:
- NOAEL
- Value:
- 1 000 mg/kg bw/day
- Explanation for the modification of the dose descriptor starting point:
- The starting point is derived from an oral study; correction is therefore not required.
- AF for dose response relationship:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for differences in duration of exposure:
- 2
- Justification:
- extrapolation from a sub-chronic study to chronic exposure
- AF for interspecies differences (allometric scaling):
- 4
- Justification:
- starting point derived from a rat study
- AF for other interspecies differences:
- 2.5
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for intraspecies differences:
- 10
- Justification:
- default value (general population)
- AF for the quality of the whole database:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
- AF for remaining uncertainties:
- 1
- Justification:
- default value
Acute/short term exposure
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
DNEL related information
General Population - Hazard for the eyes
Local effects
- Hazard assessment conclusion:
- no hazard identified
Additional information - General Population
DNEL Derivation
Polyol PX is of low acute toxicity, is not an irritant or sensitiser. An OECD 408 study with Polyol PX reports no effects at the highest (limit) dose level tested of 1000 mg/kg bw/d. A study of developmental toxicity performed with Polyol PX which also reports maternal and developmental NOAELs of 1000 mg/kg bw/d. An overall NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d is therefore used as a PoD for DNEL derivation.
Inhalation DNELs
Systemic inhalation DNELs
In the absence of an inhalation study, a corrected inhalation starting point is derived from the oral NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d. The oral NOAEL is corrected for breathing rate (/1.15), resulting in a corrected inhalation NOAEC of 435 mg/m3.
Applying individual assessment factors of 1 (for dose-response relationship), 2 (for duration of exposure), 1 (for allometric scaling), 2.5 (for other interspecies differences), 10 (for intraspecies differences), 1 (for database quality) and 1 (for remaining uncertainties) results in an overall assessment factor of 50. Applying the overall assessment factor to the corrected starting point results in a DNEL of 8.7 mg/m3.
The substance is of very low acute toxicity. No hazard is identified; a short-term systemic inhalation DNEL is not required.
Local inhalation DNELs
The substance is not classified as a skin or eye irritant and there is no evidence for respiratory irritation or sensitisation. In the absence of an identified hazard, a local inhalation DNEL is not derived.
Dermal DNELs
Systemic dermal DNELs
A study of repeated dose dermal toxicity is not available. Dermal absorption and oral absorption are assumed (worst case) to be equivalent). A corrected dermal NOAEL of 1000 mg/kg bw/d is therefore derived.
Applying individual assessment factors of 1 (for dose-response relationship), 2 (for duration of exposure), 4 (for allometric scaling), 2.5 (for other interspecies differences), 10 (for intraspecies differences), 1 (for database quality) and 1 (for remaining uncertainties) results in an overall assessment factor of 200. Applying the overall assessment factor to the corrected starting point results in a DNEL of 5 mg/kg bw/d.
The substance is of very low acute toxicity. No hazard is identified; a short-term systemic dermal DNEL is not required.
Local dermal DNELs
The substance is not classified as a skin or eye irritant and there is no evidence for skin irritation or sensitisation. In the absence of an identified hazard, a local dermal DNEL is not derived.
Oral DNELs
Systemic oral DNELs
The starting point is derived from an oral study; correction is therefore not required.
Applying individual assessment factors of 1 (for dose-response relationship), 2 (for duration of exposure), 4 (for allometric scaling), 2.5 (for other interspecies differences), 10 (for intraspecies differences), 1 (for database quality) and 1 (for remaining uncertainties) results in an overall assessment factor of 200. Applying the overall assessment factor to the corrected starting point results in a DNEL of 5 mg/kg bw/d.
The substance is of very low acute toxicity. No hazard is identified; a short-term systemic oral DNEL is not required.
The substance is not classified as an eye irritant.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.