Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 946-569-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Boiling point
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- boiling point
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 18 July to 23 August 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- The study was conducted according to an internationally recognised method, and under GLP. The substance is considered to be adequately characterised. Therefore full validation applies.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 103 (Boiling Point)
- Version / remarks:
- 1995
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.2 (Boiling Temperature)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Not applicable
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- GLP compliance programme (inspected on 13-14 October 2014 / signed on 8 April 2015)
- Type of method:
- dynamic method
- Key result
- Decomposition:
- ambiguous
- Remarks on result:
- other: No defined boiling point of the test item could be determined using the dynamic method
- Conclusions:
- No clear initial boiling point of the test item could be determined using the dynamic method and considering the complex nature of the substance.
- Executive summary:
The boiling point of the test substance was determined under GLP by dynamic method according to EU A2 guideline.
Different methods were used to determine the boiling point of this substance: Siwoloboff pre-test, DSC measurement and Cottrell method (dynamic method) as a main test.
The pre-test with Siwoloboff method was difficult to perform considering the dark colour of the test item. As DSC measurement showed no events, Dynamic method was chosen as a main method.
Two experiments were conducted but no clear initial boiling point of the test item could be determined using this method and considering the complex nature of the substance. At a test item temperature of approximately 100°C (resp. 102°C), the test item foamed and at 146°C (resp. 130°C), a colourless condensate was observed.This might be due to the evaporation / vaporisation of higher volatile components of the test item or to a decomposition of the substance.
Boiling of the major part of the substance, indicated by pumping of the Cottrell pump, was observed at a test item temperature of 180°C (resp. 185°C). These results are quite close to the results obtained in the pre-test using Siwoloboff method.
However, the thermometer in the Cottrell pump showed a much lower temperature than the temperature in the sample, eg. 100.6°C (first determination) and 77.7°C (second determination), while the temperature measured in the sample fluctuated between 180 and 185°C. This temperature difference between the thermometers was also observed when the test item foamed and when the condensate was observed. It can be a sign of decomposition of the substance.
Finally, the temperature of initial boiling point and / or initial decomposition of the test item cannot be determined using the dynamic method. Considering that the DSC didn’t allow to detect a potential decomposition or a phase transition of the substance (such as boiling point), no initial boiling point of the test could be determined using the standard methods reported in this report.
No observations were made which might cause doubts on the validity of the study outcome. Therefore, the result of the study is considered valid.
Reference
RESULTS
Different methods were performed to determine the boiling point of this substance: Siwoloboff pre-test, DSC measurement and cottrell method (main test).
Pre-test for the boiling point following Siwoloboff
Table 4.3/1.- Observations Pre-test for the boiling point following Siwoloboff
Observations |
Temperatures |
At the bottom started to shrivel |
Since 55 °C |
Getting darker and more shrivelled |
Since 60 °C |
Completely melted to a red-brown liquid, the colour was very dark. Observations through the drilled-hole was difficult, only every now and then observed at the surface |
80 °C |
Some bubbles at the surface visible |
Since 100 °C |
The test item boiled / foamed at the surface and the foam rose upside. Lots of bubbles above liquid with individual bubble from the bottom. |
Since 145 °C |
Bubbles came often |
Since 170 °C |
Performance of heating and turned off the burner |
Up to 200 °C, |
No more bubbles and foam visible |
170 °C |
The test item was a red-brown solid. A part of the test item was taken to grind, the test item was visually looked like the original state |
After cooling down |
The colour was very dark and difficult to observe through the hole, only observation at the surface was performed.
DSC Method
Security Pre-test for the DSC instrument
Thecrucible was found visually unchanged after reaching a temperature of 420°C. The weight was recorded with 48.81 mg (2.72 mg residue). After further heating to 600°C and cooling down the crucible was bloated. The weight was recorded with 46.47 mg (0.38 mg residue). After heating and weighing of 600 °C the crucible was opened, a black residue (like charcoal) was visible.
Calibration
After calibration with indium and zinc the measurement of indium yielded the following values:
Table 4.3/2.-Values DSC Indium
ExpectedMelting point |
Measured Melting point |
Expected Energy |
Measured Energy |
Assessment |
156.6 ± 1.0°C |
156.29 °C |
28.45 ± 1.0 J/g |
28.78 J/g |
OK |
The measurement of indium after calibration met the validity criteria.
Results with DSC method
Table 4.3/3.- Values Observations
Mass test item |
Mass crucible (before measurement): |
Mass crucible (after measurement): |
Observations |
|
First Measurement |
1.10 mg |
46.29 mg |
46.22 mg |
After the test the crucible was visually unchanged. The crucible was opened, a red-brown glassy mass was visible. |
Second Measurement |
2.96 mg |
48.88 mg |
48.84 mg |
After the test the crucible was visually unchanged |
Third Measurement |
3.12 mg |
49.08 mg |
48.97 mg |
After the test the crucible was visually unchanged |
Fourth Measurement |
3.00 mg |
48.76 mg |
48.63 mg |
After the test the crucible was visually unchanged |
DSC measurements show no events, for that raison boiling point was performed with the dynamic method with Cottrell Apparatus.
Results with dynamic method (main test)
Table 4.3/4.-Observation with Dynamic method with Cottrell Apparatus
Observations |
First determination |
Second determination |
Test item melted to a red-brown liquid |
- |
- |
Test item foamed |
43.8 °C (in Cottrell-pump) 100.0 °C (in test item) |
45.1 °C (in Cottrell-pump) 102.0 °C (in test item) |
Started to boil with colourless condensate |
55.0 °C (in Cottrell-pump) 146.0 °C (in test item) |
56.1 °C (in Cottrell-pump) 130.0 °C (in test item) |
Test item boiled with lots of condensate and vapour, some part splashed in the air, turned off burner |
100.6 °C (in Cottrell-pump) 180.0 °C (in test item) |
77.7 °C (in Cottrell-pump) 185.0 °C (in test item) |
After cooling down |
Test item was a dark red-brown solid |
Test item was a dark red-brown solid |
No calculation following Sydney-Young was carried out as no clear initial boiling point and initial decomposition was determined.
Validity boiling point Dynamic Method with Cottrell Apparatus
As decomposition occurred no valid criteria must be considered.
DISCUSION
Siwoloboff method was used in a pre-test but the colour of the test item was very dark and was difficult to observe through the hole. Only observation at the surface could be possible.
Three experiments were conducted via DSC (differential scanning calorimetry). As DSC measurements showed no events, other method was chosen.
Finally the determination of the Boiling Point with Dynamic Method - Cottrell Apparatus was performed.
Two experiments were performed using the dynamic method to determine the initial boiling point of the substance. At a test item temperature of approximately 100°C (resp. 102°C), the test item foamed and at 146°C (resp. 130°C), a colourless condensate was observed.This might be due to the evaporation / vaporisation of higher volatile components of the test item or to a decomposition of the substance.
Boiling of the major part of the substance, indicated by pumping of the Cottrell pump, was observed at a test item temperature of 180°C (resp. 185°C). These results are quite close to the results obtained in the pre-test using Siwoloboff method.
However, the thermometer in the Cottrell pump showed a much lower temperature than the temperature in the sample, eg. 100.6°C (first determination) and 77.7°C (second determination), while the temperature measured in the sample fluctuated between 180 and 185°C. This temperature difference between the thermometers was also observed when the test item foamed and when the condensate was observed. It can be a sign of decomposition of the substance.
Finally, the temperature of initial boiling point and / or initial decomposition of the test item cannot be determined using the dynamic method. Considering that the DSC didn’t allow to detect a potential decomposition or a phase transition of the substance (such as boiling point), no initial boiling point of the test could be determined using the standard methods reported in this report.
No observations were made which might cause doubts on the validity of the study outcome. Therefore, the result of the study is considered valid.
Description of key information
No clear initial boiling point of the test item could be determined using the dynamic method and considering the complex nature of the substance.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
A reliable experimental study, conducted according to a recognized OECD/EC, following the dynamic method and under GLP, is available. It is considered as a key study.
Different methods were used to determine the boiling point of this substance: Siwoloboff pre-test, DSC measurement and Cottrell method (dynamic method) as a main test.
The pre-test with Siwoloboff method was difficult to perform considering the dark colour of the test item. As DSC measurement showed no events, dynamic method was chosen as a main method.
Two experiments were conducted but no clear initial boiling point of the test item could be determined using this method and considering the complex nature of the substance. At a test item temperature of approximately 100°C (resp. 102°C), the test item foamed and at 146°C (resp. 130°C), a colourless condensate was observed.This might be due to the evaporation / vaporisation of higher volatile components of the test item or to a decomposition of the substance.
Boiling of the major part of the substance, indicated by pumping of the Cottrell pump, was observed at a test item temperature of 180°C (resp. 185°C). These results are quite close to the results obtained in the pre-test using Siwoloboff method.
Significant difference between the sample temperature and the temperature of the Cottrell pump when observed.
Therefore no key value is retained for this endpoint.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.