Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
14 - 30 Apr 2009
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2009
Report date:
2009

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Version / remarks:
OECD 201
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
No. 1/2007/DPL

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Reaction products of acetic acid and acetylferrocene and butan-1-ol and 2-methylpropan-1-ol and propan-1-ol and propan-2-ol
EC Number:
700-283-7
Molecular formula:
Exact molecular formula is not known as it is a reaction mass. Empiric formula: C5H5FeC5H4COCmHn
IUPAC Name:
Reaction products of acetic acid and acetylferrocene and butan-1-ol and 2-methylpropan-1-ol and propan-1-ol and propan-2-ol
Details on test material:
According to INQ-C-0000036278-61-01, INQ-C-0000036386-62-01, and INQ_RESULT_INQ-C-0000036417-65-01 from ECHA, identification of a substance has been changed to UVCB substance. Name of the substance on the study results is the old name (reaction mass of butan-1-ol and propan-2-ol, ReduxCo), however these reports should be regarded valid as all studies were performed on the substance that is being registered - ReduxCo.

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
not specified

Test solutions

Vehicle:
not specified

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (previous names: Raphidocelis subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)

Study design

Test type:
not specified
Water media type:
not specified
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
45.19 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: yield inhibition
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
3.2 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: yield inhibition
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
10 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
1 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: yield inhibition
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
3.2 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
the following results were obtained in the study: - increase of biomass in control during 72 h was 230 times (criterion - not less than 16 times) - coefficient of variation for specific growth rate for control in the whole period of test is: 0.9 % (criter
Conclusions:
Taking into consideration EC50 value, inherently biodegradable and LogPow we can assume that substance is not classified as dangerous for environment.
Based on the test results and according to the EC criteria for classification and labelling requirements for dangerous substances and preaprationd the test substance did not fall into any of quoted categories of dangerous for environment and has no obligatory labelling requirements in this respect.
Executive summary:

Based on the test results and according to the EC criteria for classification and labelling requirements for dangerous substances and preaprationd the test substance did not fall into any of quoted categories of dangerous for environment and has no obligatory labelling requirements in this respect.