Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Skin irritation

Data available for the structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the skin irritation potential of the test chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0). The studies are as mentioned below:

 

1. The skin irritation study of read across chemical was performed as per OECD Guidelines 404 in three female New Zealand White rabbits and complying with the GLP procedures. The animals were prepared 24 hours prior to application of test product. The furs from the dorsal area of trunk of animals were removed with electric clippers exposing an area measuring approximately 6 cm2 of body surface area of animal. The care was taken such that abrasion penetrated the Stratum corneum only and not dermis. 500gm (0.5g) of test compound was applied on a small area (approximately 6 cm2) of intact skin site. Each site of application was covered with impervious dressing which was secured in position with adhesive tape. The intact skin site of application of each animal was observed for signs of erythema and oedema at 60 min., 24, 48 and 72 hours after application and the responses were scored according to Draize method. The Primary Irritation Index (PII) fortest chemicalafter 14 days of observation was 0.0.Alsothe chemicaldid not produce pain and any clinical signs of toxicity throughout the examination period of 14 days. Hence, under the test conditions,the test substancecan be concluded to be not irritating to New Zealand White rabbit skin.

 

2. The above result was further supported by another experimental study conducted for the read cross chemical in Sprague Dawley rats. The study was performed as per OECD Guidelines 402 and complying to the GLP procedures. The test item was applied to shorn skin of 5 male and 5 female animals at 2000 mg/kg body weight. Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any skin reaction at the site of application during the study period of 14 days. Administration of the test item did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality during the study period of 14 days.    Animals exhibited normal body weight gain through the study period of 14 days. Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities attributable to the treatment. The overall irritation score of the substance was obtained to be 0 and no erythema and edema (skin irritation) were observed at the end of 14 days observation period after patch removal. Hence, it was concluded that the test substance was non-Irritating to the skin of rats under the experimental conditions tested.

 

Based on the above summarized studies for target chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0) and its structurally similar read across substances,it can be concluded that the testchemical is not able to cause skin irritation and considered as not irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not Classified.

 

Eye irritation

Data available for the structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the ocular irritation potential of the test chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0). The studies are as mentioned below:

 

The experimental study was conducted for the structurally similar read across substance in three female New Zealand White rabbits as per OECD Guidelines 405 and complying to the GLP procedures. About 0.1g of the undiluted test chemical was instilled in the conjunctival sac of rabbits after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The other eye which remained untreated served as a control. The ocular lesions were evaluated at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the treatment. The grades of ocular reactions (conjunctiva, cornea and iris) were recorded at each observation. To determine the reversibility of the effect the animals were observed normally for 21 days. Any other lesions in the eye viz pannus, staining were observed and scored accordingly. Examination of reactions was facilitated by use of biomicroscope and hand slit lamp. Individual animal weights before and during the study was observed. The overall irritation index of test chemical was 0.0 after 72 hours. Also did not produce any clinical signs of toxicity throughout the examination period of 21 days. Hence, under the test conditions, the chemical can be concluded to be not irritating to New Zealand White rabbit eyes.

 

The above results were further supported by an eye irritation study conducted by peer reviewed journal on 6 female and 6 male New Zealand White rabbits for read across chemical. About 30 μl of test chemical in aq. solution was administered into the right eye of rabbits and left eyes served as untreated controls. Ocular irritation was determined according to a modification of the Draize test. All animals were checked for viability twice daily. Ocular irritation was scored 24 h after each treatment and prior to the next instillation. On days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 the eyes were also evaluated 1 h after treatment. 24 h after each treatment additionally eye stain and particle depositions were scored. Ophthalmic observations were conducted on days 3, 7 and 14 always prior to instillation. No lethality or significant clinical signs, and no substance-related weight change were observed. Except slight conjunctival redness or discharge, that were seen sporadically in the eyes of the animals, all animals were free of significant signs of ocular irritation. No significant signs of eye staining or particle depositions were observed. At ophthalmoscopic examinations, no ocular abnormities were noticed. Hence, the test substance was not expected to cause irritant effects following repeated treatment of eyes in a concentration of 3 % in aqueous solution.

 

Based on the above summarized studies for target chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0) and its structurally similar read across substances,it can be concluded that the testchemical is not able to cause eye irritation and considered as not irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not Classified.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Remarks:
experimental data of read across substances
Justification for type of information:
Data for the target chemical is summarized based on the structurally similar read across chemicals
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: as mentioned below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
WoE report is based on 2 skin irritation studies as- WoE-2 and WoE-3.
Skin irritation study of test chemical was conducted on rats and rabbits to assess its skin irritating effects.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material : 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N'-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs.
- Molecular formula: C17H18ClN7O9S2
- Molecular weight: 563.954g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: solid
-Smiles: N1(c2ccc(cc2)S(=O)(=O)O)N=C(C(O)=O)[C@@H](\N=N\c2ccc(cc2)S(=O)(=O)O)C1=O.C(=N)(N)N.Cl
-InChI: 1S/C16H12N4O9S2.CH5N3.ClH/c21-15-13(18-17-9-1-5-11(6-2-9)30(24,25)26)14(16(22)23)19-20(15)10-3-7-12(8-4-10)31(27,28)29;2-1(3)4;/h1-8,13H,(H,22,23)(H,24,25,26)(H,27,28,29);(H5,2,3,4);1H/b18-17+;;
Species:
other: 1.Rabbit 2. Rat
Strain:
other: 1.New Zealand White 2.Sprague-Dawley
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
1. Details on test animals
Age: 10 to 12 weeks
Sex:Female
Body weight range: 2.0kg±200g
Identification : By cage tag and corresponding colour body marking
Housing:Animals were housed individually in stainless steel cages provided with stainless steel mesh bottom and facilities for food and water bottle.
Diet:Pelleted feed supplied by Pranav agro Industries Ltd., B7/6 Ramesh Nagar, Delhi
Water:Community tap water passed through ‘Aqua Guard on line water filter’, was kept in glass bottles, ad libitum
Acclimatization: The healthy rabbits selected for study was acclimatized to standard laboratory condition for one week in experimental room under Veterinary examination.
Randomization: After acclimatization and Veterinary examination three females were randomly selected.
Details on environmental conditions:
- Temperature (°C): temperature between 22-25 deg C
- Humidity (%): relative humidity 40-60%
- Air changes (per hr): Air conditioned rooms with 10-15 air changes per hour,
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): illumination cycle set to 12 hours artificial fluorescent light and 12 hours dark.
HUSBANDRY
Environmental conditions :Air conditioned rooms with 10-15 air changes per hour, temperature between 19-25 0C, relative humidity 30-60% and illumination cycle set to 12 hours artificial fluorescent light and 12 hours dark.
Accommodation Animals were housed individually in stainless steel cages provided with stainless steel mesh bottom and facilities for food and water bottle.
Diet : Pelleted feed supplied by Pranav agro Industries Ltd., B7/6 Ramesh Nagar, Delhi, India
Water : Community tap water passed through ‘Aqua Guard on line water filter’, was kept in glass bottles,mad-libitum

2. TEST ANIMALS
- Source: National Institute of Biosciences, Pune.
- Age at study initiation: Young adult male and female rats aged between 6 – 9 weeks were used.
- Weight at study initiation: The weight range of approximately 217.1 to 255.7 grams at initiation of dosing were used.
Body weights at the start :
Male
Mean : 246.04 g (= 100 %)
Minimum : 238.3 g (- 3.15 %)
Maximum : 255.7 g (+ 3.93 %)
Total No. of animals : 5
Female
Mean : 223.74 g (= 100 %)
Minimum : 217.1 g (- 2.97 %)
Maximum : 231.3 g (+ 3.38 %)
Total No. of animals : 5
- Housing: The rats were individually housed in polycarbonate cages with paddy husk as bedding.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Rodent feed supplied by the Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune, was provided ad libitum from individual feeders.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): Water was provided ad libitum from individual bottles attached to the cages. All water was from a local source and passed through the reverse osmosis membrane before use.
- Acclimation period : 5 days.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): Room temperature was maintained at 20.0 to 22.3 degree centigrade.
- Humidity (%): Room humidity was maintained at 55.7% to 59.6%.
- Air changes (per hr): The animal room was independently provided with at least ten to fifteen air changes per hour of 100% fresh air that had been passed through the HEPA filters.
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): An artificial light and dark cycle of 12 hours each was provided to the room.
IN-LIFE DATES: No data
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
clipped
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
1. 500 mg (0.5g)
2. 2000 mg/kg bw
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1. 4 hours
2. 24 hours
Observation period:
1.60 min., 24, 48 and 72 hours after application.
2. 14 days
Number of animals:
1. 3 female rabbits
2. 10 (5/sex).
Details on study design:
1. TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: dorsal area of trunk
- % coverage: small area (approximately 6 cm2)
- Type of wrap if used: impervious dressing which was secured in position with adhesive tape
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): yes
- Time after start of exposure:after patch removal the test site was washed with lukewarm water
OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
(indicate if minutes, hours or days) : The intact skin site of application of each animal was observed for signs of erythema and oedema at 60 min., 24, 48 and 72 hours after application.
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Method of calculation:The intact skin site of application of each animal was observed for signs of erythema and oedema and the responses were scored following Draize’s method.

2. TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: Dorsal surface and sides from scapular to pelvic area.
- % coverage: Approximately 10% of the total body surface area.
- Type of wrap if used: Porous gauze dressing and non-irritating tape.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Distilled water was used to remove residual test item.
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hours
OBSERVATION TIME POINTS
(indicate if minutes, hours or days) : observations were conducted at 10, 30, 60 minutes, 2, 4 and 6 hours on the day of dosing and once daily thereafter for 14 day.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize Method.
Irritation parameter:
primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
Basis:
mean
Time point:
14 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
14 d
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
1. The test compound applied at the dose level of 500mg on shaven back skin of rabbit did not produced any irritation to skin during period of observation.

2.Overall result:
Sex : Male
Group I -
Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any skin reaction during the study period of 14 days.

Sex : Female
Group I -
Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any skin reaction during the study period of 14 days.

Results based on erythema and edema score:
Irritation parameter : erythema score
Basis : animal:1-5
Time point : other: 0 - 14 d
Score : 0
Max. score : 0
Reversibility: no data
Remarks on result : no indication of irritation

Irritation parameter : edema score
Basis : animal:1-5
Time point : other: 0 - 14 d
Score : 0
Max. score : 0
Reversibility: no data
Remarks on result : no indication of irritation

Irritation parameter : erythema score
Basis : animal: 6-10
Time point : other: 0 - 14 d
Score : 0
Max. score : 0
Reversibility: no data
Remarks on result : no indication of irritation

Irritation parameter : edema score
Basis : animal:6-10
Time point : other: 0 - 14 d
Score : 0
Max. score : 0
Reversibility: no data
Remarks on result : no indication of irritation
Other effects:
1. The test compound applied on the shaven back skin of rabbit did not produce pain and any clinical signs of toxicity throughout the examination period of 14 days.

2.Clinical signs
Sex : Male
Group I -
Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any signs of toxicity during the study period of 14 days. All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.

Sex : Female
Group I -
Animal treated at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight did not result in any signs of toxicity during the study period of 14 days. All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.

Body Weight
Sex : Male
Group I (2000 mg/kg) - Percent body weight gain after 7 days and 14 days was found to be 10.18% and 19.28% respectively.

Sex : Female
Group I (2000 mg/kg) - Percent body weight gain after 7 days and 14 days was found to be 5.60% and 11.43% respectively.

Mortality
Sex : Male
Group I - All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.

Sex : Female
Group I - All animals survived through the study period of 14 days.


Gross Pathological Findings
Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities in animals from 2000 mg/kg dose group.

1.

TABLE - 1

INDIVIDUAL ANIMAL DERMAL IRRITATION SCORES

Rabbit No.

Sex

INTACT SKIN

3 Min.

4 Hours

24 Hours

48 Hours

72 Hours

14 days

Erythema

Oedema

Erythema

Oedema

Erythema

Oedema

Erythema

Oedema

Erythema

Oedema

Erythema

Oedema

01

F

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

02

F

-

-

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

03

F

-

-

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Total

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Mean

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

Grand Total

0.00

Dermal Irritation Index: 0.0/4 = 0.0

2.

Table No. I

 

Summary of Evaluation of Dermal Reaction

Test System : Sprague Dawley Rat

Sex : Male 

Group

 No.

Dose mg/kg

                          

Dermal Reaction

Total Number of

Animals

 

Animal Nos.

Period of signs in days

 From - to

 

Mortality

I

2000

No dermal reaction observed

5

1 - 5

0 - 14

0/5

 

 

Sex : Female

 

Group

 No.

Dose mg/kg

                          

Dermal Reaction

Total Number of

Animals

 

Animal Nos.

Period of signs in days

 From - to

 

Mortality

I

2000

No dermal reaction observed

5

6 - 10

0 - 14

0/5

  

Table No.II

 

Individual Animal - Evaluation of Dermal Reaction

 

Laboratory Test Item Code :TAS/122/008

Test System : Sprague Dawley Rat

Sex : Male  

Group : I

Dose  : 2000 mg/kg body weight

Animal

Dermal

D A Y S

 

No.

Reaction

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

1

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Oedema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Oedema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Oedema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

4

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Oedema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

5

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Oedema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Sex : Female  

Group : I

Dose  : 2000 mg/kg body weight

Animal

Dermal

D A Y S

 

No.

Reaction

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

6

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Oedema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

7

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Oedema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

8

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Oedema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

9

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Oedema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

10

Erythema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Oedema

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Interpretation of results:
other: Not irritating
Conclusions:
The test chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0) was considered to be not irritating to the skin.
Executive summary:

Data available for the structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the skin irritation potential of the test chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0). The studies are as mentioned below:

 

1. The skin irritation study of read across chemical was performed as per OECD Guidelines 404 in three female New Zealand White rabbits and complying with the GLP procedures. The animals were prepared 24 hours prior to application of test product. The furs from the dorsal area of trunk of animals were removed with electric clippers exposing an area measuring approximately 6 cm2 of body surface area of animal. The care was taken such that abrasion penetrated the Stratum corneum only and not dermis. 500gm (0.5g) of test compound was applied on a small area (approximately 6 cm2) of intact skin site. Each site of application was covered with impervious dressing which was secured in position with adhesive tape. The intact skin site of application of each animal was observed for signs of erythema and oedema at 60 min., 24, 48 and 72 hours after application and the responses were scored according to Draize method. The Primary Irritation Index (PII) fortest chemicalafter 14 days of observation was 0.0.Alsothe chemicaldid not produce pain and any clinical signs of toxicity throughout the examination period of 14 days. Hence, under the test conditions,the test substancecan be concluded to be not irritating to New Zealand White rabbit skin.

 

2. The above result was further supported by another experimental study conducted for the read cross chemical in Sprague Dawley rats. The study was performed as per OECD Guidelines 402 and complying to the GLP procedures. The test item was applied to shorn skin of 5 male and 5 female animals at 2000 mg/kg body weight. Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any skin reaction at the site of application during the study period of 14 days. Administration of the test item did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality during the study period of 14 days.    Animals exhibited normal body weight gain through the study period of 14 days. Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities attributable to the treatment. The overall irritation score of the substance was obtained to be 0 and no erythema and edema (skin irritation) were observed at the end of 14 days observation period after patch removal. Hence, it was concluded that the test substance was non-Irritating to the skin of rats under the experimental conditions tested.

 

Based on the above summarized studies for target chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0) and its structurally similar read across substances,it can be concluded that the testchemical is not able to cause skin irritation and considered as not irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not Classified.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Remarks:
experimental data of read across substances
Justification for type of information:
Data for the target chemical is summarized based on the structurally similar read across chemicals
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: as mentioned below
Principles of method if other than guideline:
WoE report is based on 2 eye irritation studies as- WoE-2 and WoE-3.
An eye irritation study of test chemical was conducted on rats and rabbits to assess its eye irritating effects.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Name of test material : 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N'-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs.
- Molecular formula: C17H18ClN7O9S2
- Molecular weight: 563.954g/mol
- Substance type: Organic
- Physical state: solid
-Smiles: N1(c2ccc(cc2)S(=O)(=O)O)N=C(C(O)=O)[C@@H](\N=N\c2ccc(cc2)S(=O)(=O)O)C1=O.C(=N)(N)N.Cl
-InChI: 1S/C16H12N4O9S2.CH5N3.ClH/c21-15-13(18-17-9-1-5-11(6-2-9)30(24,25)26)14(16(22)23)19-20(15)10-3-7-12(8-4-10)31(27,28)29;2-1(3)4;/h1-8,13H,(H,22,23)(H,24,25,26)(H,27,28,29);(H5,2,3,4);1H/b18-17+;;
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
1. Details on test animals
Age: 10 to 12 weeks
Sex:Female
Body weight range: 2.0kg±200g
Identification : By cage tag and corresponding colour body marking
Housing:Animals were housed individually in stainless steel cages provided with stainless steel mesh bottom and facilities for food and water bottle.
Diet:Pelleted feed supplied by Pranav agro Industries Ltd., B7/6 Ramesh Nagar, Delhi
Water:Community tap water passed through ‘Aqua Guard on line water filter’, was kept in glass bottles, ad libitum
Acclimatization: The healthy rabbits selected for study was acclimatized to standard laboratory condition for one week in experimental room under Veterinary examination.
Randomization: After acclimatization and Veterinary examination three females were randomly selected.
Details on environmental conditions:
- Temperature (°C): temperature between 22-25 deg C
- Humidity (%): relative humidity 40-60%
- Air changes (per hr): Air conditioned rooms with 10-15 air changes per hour,
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): illumination cycle set to 12 hours artificial fluorescent light and 12 hours dark.
HUSBANDRY
Environmental conditions :Air conditioned rooms with 10-15 air changes per hour, temperature between 19-25 0C, relative humidity 30-60% and illumination cycle set to 12 hours artificial fluorescent light and 12 hours dark.
Accommodation Animals were housed individually in stainless steel cages provided with stainless steel mesh bottom and facilities for food and water bottle.
Diet : Pelleted feed supplied by Pranav agro Industries Ltd., B7/6 Ramesh Nagar, Delhi, India
Water : Community tap water passed through ‘Aqua Guard on line water filter’, was kept in glass bottles,mad-libitum

2. Details on test animal
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Summit View Farm, Hazelton, PA, USA
- Age at study initiation:
- Weight at study initiation: 3.0-3.5 kg,
- Housing: Rabbits were individually housed in stainless steel, wire mesh-floor cages in a room
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): feed (Certified Lab Rabbit Chow HF; Purina No. 5325) was limited to 125g/day
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: All animals were acclimatized for at least 2 wk prior to the start of the study

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 16-21°C
- Humidity (%):38%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-hr light/dark cycle
Vehicle:
other: 1.unchnged 2. aqueous solution with 0.5 % (w/v) hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and 0.25 % (w/v) laureth-10 acetate)
Controls:
yes
Amount / concentration applied:
1. 100mg (0.1g)
2. 30 μl of test solution (3 % (w/v)
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1. 24 hours
2. 1 application daily for 21 days
Observation period (in vivo):
1. The eyes were examined at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after test substance application
2. Ophthalmic observations were conducted on days 3, 7 and 14 always prior to instillation.
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
1. 3 female rabbits
2. 6 female and 6 male New Zealand White rabbits
Details on study design:
1. REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): not washed
SCORING SYSTEM:Scale of weighted scores for grading the severity of ocular lesions developed by Draize et al
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp / biomicroscope / fluorescein: hand-slit lamp
Examination of reactions was facilitated by use of biomicroscope and hand slit lamp. After recording the observations at 24 hours, the eyes were further examined with the aid of fluorescein.
2. Details on study design
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure:Right eye of rabbit
- % coverage:
- Type of wrap if used:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done):
- Time after start of exposure:
SCORING SYSTEM:Draize procedure
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
72 h
Score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
overall irritation score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24 h
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: slight conjunctival redness or discharge, that were seen sporadically in the eyes of the animals, all animals were free of significant signs of ocular irritation, No significant signs of eye staining or particle depositions were observed.
Irritant / corrosive response data:
1.The test compound when applied to the eye of New Zealand white rabbit at the dose level of 0.1gm did not produce any lesions such as pannus, staining throughout the observation period of 72 hours.
2. slight conjunctival redness or discharge, that were seen sporadically in the eyes of the
animals, all animals were free of significant signs of ocular irritation, No significant signs of eye staining or particle depositions were observed. At ophthalmoscopic examinations, no ocular abnormities were noticed.
Other effects:
1.The test compound applied in conjunctival sac of rabbits did not show any observable clinical signs of eye irritation throughout the observation period of 21 days.
2.No lethality or significant clinical signs, and no substance-related weight change were observed

1.

TABLE- 1     GRADING OF OCULAR LESIONS

 

S.NO/

SEX

 

OBSERVATION

Score

Total

Total Score

1/F

 

1 hr

24hrs

48 hrs

72 hrs

Cornea

A.       Opacity-Degree of Density

0

0

0

0

0

0×0×5=0

B.       Area of Cornea Involved

0

0

0

0

0

Iris

A.       Values

0

0

0

0

0

0

Conjunctivae

A.       Redness

1

0

0

0

1

0+0+0×5=5

B.       Chemosis

0

0

0

0

0

C.       Discharge 

0

0

0

0

0

2/F

Cornea

A.       Opacity-Degree of Density

0

0

0

0

0

0×0×5=0

B.       Area of Cornea Involved

0

0

0

0

0

Iris

A.       Values

0

0

0

0

0

0

Conjunctivae

A.       Redness

1

0

0

0

1

0+0+0×5=5

B.       Chemosis

0

0

0

0

0

C.       Discharge 

0

0

0

0

0

3/F

Cornea

A.       Opacity-Degree of Density

0

0

0

0

0

0×0×5=0

B.       Area of Cornea Involved

0

0

0

0

0

Iris

A.       Values

0

0

0

0

0

0

Conjunctivae

A.       Redness

1

0

0

0

1

0+0+0×5=5

B.       Chemosis

0

0

0

0

0

C.       Discharge 

0

0

0

0

0

Grand total

0.00

Mean

0.00

Eye Irritation Scoring index

0.00

2. Not specified

Interpretation of results:
other: not irritating
Conclusions:
The test chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N'-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0) was considered to be not irritating to the rabbits' eyes.
Executive summary:

Data available for the structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the ocular irritation potential of the test chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0). The studies are as mentioned below:

 

The experimental study was for the structurally similar read across substance in in three female New Zealand White rabbits as per OECD Guidelines 405 and complying to the GLP procedures. About 0.1g of the undiluted test chemical was instilled in the conjunctival sac of rabbits after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The other eye which remained untreated served as a control. The ocular lesions were evaluated at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the treatment. The grades of ocular reactions (conjunctiva, cornea and iris) were recorded at each observation. To determine the reversibility of the effect the animals were observed normally for 21 days. Any other lesions in the eye viz pannus, staining were observed and scored accordingly. Examination of reactions was facilitated by use of biomicroscope and hand slit lamp. Individual animal weights before and during the study was observed. The overall irritation index of test chemical was 0.0 after 72 hours. Also did not produce any clinical signs of toxicity throughout the examination period of 21 days. Hence, under the test conditions, the chemical can be concluded to be not irritating to New Zealand White rabbit eyes.

 

The above results were further supported by an eye irritation study conducted by peer reviewed journal on 6 female and 6 male New Zealand White rabbits for read across chemical. About 30 μl of test chemical in aq. solution was administered into the right eye of rabbits and left eyes served as untreated controls. Ocular irritation was determined according to a modification of the Draize test. All animals were checked for viability twice daily. Ocular irritation was scored 24 h after each treatment and prior to the next instillation. On days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 the eyes were also evaluated 1 h after treatment. 24 h after each treatment additionally eye stain and particle depositions were scored. Ophthalmic observations were conducted on days 3, 7 and 14 always prior to instillation. No lethality or significant clinical signs, and no substance-related weight change were observed. Except slight conjunctival redness or discharge, that were seen sporadically in the eyes of the animals, all animals were free of significant signs of ocular irritation. No significant signs of eye staining or particle depositions were observed. At ophthalmoscopic examinations, no ocular abnormities were noticed. Hence, the test substance was not expected to cause irritant effects following repeated treatment of eyes in a concentration of 3 % in aqueous solution.

 

Based on the above summarized studies for target chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0) and its structurally similar read across substances,it can be concluded that the testchemical is not able to cause eye irritation and considered as not irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not Classified.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Skin irritation

Data available for the structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the skin irritation potential of the test chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0). The studies are as mentioned below:

 

1. The skin irritation study of read across chemical was performed as per OECD Guidelines 404 in three female New Zealand White rabbits and complying with the GLP procedures. The animals were prepared 24 hours prior to application of test product. The furs from the dorsal area of trunk of animals were removed with electric clippers exposing an area measuring approximately 6 cm2 of body surface area of animal. The care was taken such that abrasion penetrated the Stratum corneum only and not dermis. 500gm (0.5g) of test compound was applied on a small area (approximately 6 cm2) of intact skin site. Each site of application was covered with impervious dressing which was secured in position with adhesive tape. The intact skin site of application of each animal was observed for signs of erythema and oedema at 60 min., 24, 48 and 72 hours after application and the responses were scored according to Draize method. The Primary Irritation Index (PII) fortest chemicalafter 14 days of observation was 0.0.Alsothe chemicaldid not produce pain and any clinical signs of toxicity throughout the examination period of 14 days. Hence, under the test conditions,the test substancecan be concluded to be not irritating to New Zealand White rabbit skin.

 

2. The above result was further supported by another experimental study conducted for the read cross chemical in Sprague Dawley rats. The study was performed as per OECD Guidelines 402 and complying to the GLP procedures. The test item was applied to shorn skin of 5 male and 5 female animals at 2000 mg/kg body weight. Administration of the test item at 2000 mg/kg did not result in any skin reaction at the site of application during the study period of 14 days. Administration of the test item did not result in any signs of toxicity and mortality during the study period of 14 days.    Animals exhibited normal body weight gain through the study period of 14 days. Gross pathological examination did not reveal any abnormalities attributable to the treatment. The overall irritation score of the substance was obtained to be 0 and no erythema and edema (skin irritation) were observed at the end of 14 days observation period after patch removal. Hence, it was concluded that the test substance was non-Irritating to the skin of rats under the experimental conditions tested.

 

Based on the above summarized studies for target chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0) and its structurally similar read across substances,it can be concluded that the testchemical is not able to cause skin irritation and considered as not irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not Classified.

 

Eye irritation

Data available for the structurally and functionally similar read across chemicals has been reviewed to determine the ocular irritation potential of the test chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0). The studies are as mentioned below:

 

The experimental study was conducted for the structurally similar read across substance in three female New Zealand White rabbits as per OECD Guidelines 405 and complying to the GLP procedures. About 0.1g of the undiluted test chemical was instilled in the conjunctival sac of rabbits after gently pulling the lower lid away from the eyeball. The other eye which remained untreated served as a control. The ocular lesions were evaluated at 1, 24, 48 and 72 hours after the treatment. The grades of ocular reactions (conjunctiva, cornea and iris) were recorded at each observation. To determine the reversibility of the effect the animals were observed normally for 21 days. Any other lesions in the eye viz pannus, staining were observed and scored accordingly. Examination of reactions was facilitated by use of biomicroscope and hand slit lamp. Individual animal weights before and during the study was observed. The overall irritation index of test chemical was 0.0 after 72 hours. Also did not produce any clinical signs of toxicity throughout the examination period of 21 days. Hence, under the test conditions, the chemical can be concluded to be not irritating to New Zealand White rabbit eyes.

 

The above results were further supported by an eye irritation study conducted by peer reviewed journal on 6 female and 6 male New Zealand White rabbits for read across chemical. About 30 μl of test chemical in aq. solution was administered into the right eye of rabbits and left eyes served as untreated controls. Ocular irritation was determined according to a modification of the Draize test. All animals were checked for viability twice daily. Ocular irritation was scored 24 h after each treatment and prior to the next instillation. On days 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 the eyes were also evaluated 1 h after treatment. 24 h after each treatment additionally eye stain and particle depositions were scored. Ophthalmic observations were conducted on days 3, 7 and 14 always prior to instillation. No lethality or significant clinical signs, and no substance-related weight change were observed. Except slight conjunctival redness or discharge, that were seen sporadically in the eyes of the animals, all animals were free of significant signs of ocular irritation. No significant signs of eye staining or particle depositions were observed. At ophthalmoscopic examinations, no ocular abnormities were noticed. Hence, the test substance was not expected to cause irritant effects following repeated treatment of eyes in a concentration of 3 % in aqueous solution.

 

Based on the above summarized studies for target chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0) and its structurally similar read across substances,it can be concluded that the testchemical is not able to cause eye irritation and considered as not irritating. Comparing the above annotations with the criteria of CLP regulation, it can be classified under the category “Not Classified.

Justification for classification or non-classification

The skin and eye irritation potential of test chemical 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0)  and its structurally and functionally similar read across substanceswere observed in various studies. The results obtained from these studies indicate that the chemical  is unlikely to cause skin and eye irritation. Hence 1H-Pyrazole-3-carboxylic acid, 4,5-dihydro-5-oxo-1-(4-sulfophenyl)-4-[(4-sulfophenyl)azo]-, reaction products with guanidine hydrochloride N,N’-bis(mixed Ph, tolyl and xylyl) derivs. (CAS No: 71077-14-0)  can be classified under the category “Not Classified” for skin and eye as per CLP.