Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

For skin sensitisation a Maurer optimisation test was conducted for Fe3O4, Fe2O3 and FeOOH as surrogates for (Fe,Mn)3O4 -  all three compounds are not irritant to skin and eye, and have no skin sensitizing potential (for further details see category justification).

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: as reported in source record
Justification for type of information:
see attachment "Endpoint-specific read-across justification for the iron oxide category" in IUCLID section 13.2.
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
336
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
0.1%
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 336.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 0.1%. No with. + reactions: 5.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
336
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
0.1%
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 336.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: 0.1%. No with. + reactions: 5.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
504
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
maximum subirritant dose
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 504.0. Group: test group. Dose level: maximum subirritant dose. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
504
Group:
negative control
Dose level:
maximum subirritant dose
No. with + reactions:
1
Total no. in group:
20
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 504.0. Group: negative control. Dose level: maximum subirritant dose. No with. + reactions: 1.0. Total no. in groups: 20.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Reading:
2nd reading
Group:
positive control
Remarks on result:
not measured/tested
Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Executive summary:

Guinea pigs were treated according the following procedure (test concentration 0.1 % in propylene glycole/water):

Induction: 10 intradermal injections. Elucidation (intradermal) injection 5 weeks after the start of the study:

(epidermal) occlusive, 7 weeks after the start of the study. As a result epidermal application of the test

substance is not sensitizing

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vitro
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin sensitisation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin sensitisation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not sensitising)
Additional information:

For the representatives of the group members no skin sensitisation potential was found in Maurer optimisation tests with members of this category.

Respiratory sensitisation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available
Additional information:

All group members of the iron oxide group are insoluble in water and inert. A sensitisation of the respiratory tract is not expected. This statement is supported by the human evidence on Fe2O3, Fe3O4, FeOOH and manganese oxides where such an effect was not described in the scientific literature.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data a classification is not justified.