Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

The key study for skin irritation found the test material not irritating (WIL 1992). It was conducted according to a protocol equivalent to the current OECD guideline, and in compliance with GLP.

The key study for eye irritation found the test substance irritating to the eyes of rabbit, based on corneal opacity of ≥1 in 3 animals, iritis of ≥1 in 4 animals and conjuntival chemosis of ≥2 in 3 animals (WIL 1992). The study was reliable and compliant with GLP.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
7 - 10 October 1991
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
comparable to guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPP 81-5 (Acute Dermal Irritation)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Japanese Agricultural Chemicals Laws and regulations Testing Guidelines for Toxicology Studies published by the Society of Agricultural Chemical Industry, under the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hazleton research Products, Inc. Pennsylvania
- Age at study initiation: Young adult
- Weight at study initiation: 2638 - 2838 grams
- Housing: Individual suspended mesh - bottom cages
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: minimum 6 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 21
- Humidity (%): 52-62
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
72 hours
Number of animals:
6F
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: the back of rabbits
- Type of wrap if used: gauze patches that were overwrapped with a gauze binder and secured with Dermiform tape

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): The sites were wiped with disposable paper towels moistened with deionized water.
- Time after start of exposure:

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 hours
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The test material induced very slight erythema in three rabbits. There was no oedema. All erythema completely subsided by day 3 or earlier. There were no other dermal findings.
Other effects:
None of the rabbits died. There were no significant body weight changes during the study period.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The test material was found not irritating to the skin of rabbits in a reliable study conducted according to current guideline and in compliance with GLP.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
October 8 - 30, 1991
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPP 81-4 (Acute Eye Irritation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hazleton Research Products Inc., Pennsylvania
- Age at study initiation: Young adult
- Weight at study initiation: 2549-3004 grams
- Housing: Individual suspended mesh-bottom cages
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: minimum 6 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18-21
- Humidity (%): 42-74
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 ml
Duration of treatment / exposure:
Single instillation
Observation period (in vivo):
21 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
4 males
2 females
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): no


SCORING SYSTEM: Draize

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: UV-light / fluorescein
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0.5
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
corneal irritation was present in 3 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 21 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
corneal irritation was present in 3 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 21 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
corneal irritation was present in 3 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 21 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0.5
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
corneal irritation was present in 3 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 21 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
corneal irritation was present in 3 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 21 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0.5
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
corneal irritation was present in 3 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 21 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
iridal irritation was present in 5 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
iridal irritation was present in 5 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
iridal irritation was present in 5 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
iridal irritation was present in 5 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 1
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
iridal irritation was present in 5 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 0.5
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
iridal irritation was present in 5 out of 6 animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal.
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal.
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal.
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal. Individual animal data are missing
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal.
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal.
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal.
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: Individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal.
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: Individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal.
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: Individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal.
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
>= 2
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
not reversible
Remarks:
minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal. Individual animal data are missing
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
individual animal data are missing - Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
ca. 1
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible
Remarks on result:
other: individual animal data are missing
Remarks:
Conjunctival irritation assessed by redness scored out of 3; chemosis scored out of 4 and/or discharge scored out of 3 was present in all 6 animals, the reactions were positive for four animals; irritation reversible by day 7 or earlier for five animals; minor conjunctival irritation persisted to termination in one animal
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Conjunctival irritation was observed in the treated eye of all animals, including positive reactions for four animals. Iridial and corneal irritation were present in the treated eye of five animals, respectively. All iridial and corneal irritation completely subsided by day 7 and day 21, respectively, or earlier. Conjunctival irritation completely subsided by day 7 or earlier for five rabbits. Minor conjunctival irritation persisted through study termination for one animal.
Interpretation of results:
Category 2A (irritating to eyes) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
The test substance was found irritating to the eyes of rabbit, based on corneal opacity of ≥1 in 3 animals, iritis of ≥1 in 4 animals and conjuntival chemosis of ≥2 in 3 animals.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

The key study for skin irritation found the test material not irritating to the skin of rabbits in a reliable study conducted according to current guideline and in compliance with GLP (WIL 1992). The test material induced very slight erythema in three rabbits. There was no oedema. All erythema completely subsided by Day 3 or earlier. There were no other dermal findings. None of the rabbits died. There were no significant body weight changes during the study period. A reliability 4 supporting study was also available, which supported the key findings (Lashmar et al., 1989).

The key study for eye irritation was conducted according to a protocol equivalent to current OECD guideline, and in compliance with GLP (WIL 1992).Conjunctival irritation was observed in the treated eye of all animals, including positive reactions for four animals. Iridial and corneal irritation were present in the treated eye of five animals, respectively. All iridial and corneal irritation completely subsided by Day 7 and Day 21, respectively, or earlier. Conjunctival irritation completely subsided by Day 7 or earlier for five rabbits. Minor conjunctival irritation persisted through study termination for one animal. The test substance was found to be irritating to the eyes of rabbits, based on corneal opacity of ≥1 in 3 animals, iritis of ≥1 in 4 animals and conjunctival chemosis of ≥2 in 3 animals. Two reliability 4 supporting studies were also available for review, which supported the findings of the key study (Conquet et al., 1976, Jacobs et al., 1988).


Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available information, no classification is required for THFA for skin irritation. In accordance with EC Regulation No. 1272/2008, THFA is classified as Category 2: Irritating to eyes, H319: Causes serious eye irritation.