Skip to Content
Skip to Content

Cases where ECHA is a party

Cases where ECHA is a party

This table contains all the court cases closed with a ruling to which ECHA has been a party. Interested parties can easily refer to decisions that may be relevant to them within the scope of ECHA's core activities (REACH, CLP, among others). For some of the cases, there may be a pending appeal or renvoi, which are also listed in the table. The table does not show staff or procurement cases.

The closed court cases have been classified into eight categories:

  1. REACH Candidate List: cases related to the identification of a substance as being of very high concern;
  2. REACH Registration: cases related to the joint submission of data obligation;
  3. REACH Authorisation: cases related to the inclusion of a substance in the Authorisation List (Annex XIV) and authorisation applications;
  4. REACH Evaluation: cases where ECHA has requested information from a registrant under the evaluation procedure (Articles 40, 41 or 46 of REACH);
  5. CLH: cases concerning the harmonisation of classification of a substance;
  6. Biocides: cases concerning biocides;
  7. ATD: cases related to requests for access to documents;
  8. Company size: cases related to company size verification and related charges. 

ECHA Cases Evaluation

 

Case number Parties Keywords Main Legal Provisions Procedurally linked cases Date of the ruling
T‑125/17 BASF GRENZACH v ECHA REACH — Evaluation of substances — Triclosan — ECHA decision requesting further information — Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Action brought before the Board of Appeal — Task of the Board of Appeal — Adversarial nature of the procedure — Scope of the review — Intensity of the review — Powers of the Board of Appeal — Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — First sentence of Article 47(1) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Relevant information — Proportionality — Article 25 of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Annex XIII to Regulation No 1907/2006 — Data obtained under relevant circumstances — Persistence — Neurotoxicity — Reproductive toxicity — Article 12(1) of Regulation (EC) No 771/2008 — Delay in the submission of a scientific opinion Arts. 51(6), 93(3), 47(1), and 25 REACH, Annex III REACH, Art. 12 (1) Reg (EC) No 771/2008 T-125/17 R 20/09/2019
T‑176/19 R 3V Sigma SpA v ECHA Application for interim measures — REACH — UVASORB HEB — Evaluation procedure — Decision of the Board of Appeal of ECHA — Application for interim measures — No urgency

Pending Case

T-176/19

15/07/2019
T755/17 Federal Republic of Germany v ECHA REACH — Evaluation of substances — Benpat — Persistence — ECHA decision requesting further information — Article 51(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 — Action brought before the Board of Appeal — Task of the Board of Appeal — Adversarial procedure — Nature of review — Intensity of review — Powers of the Board of Appeal — Article 93(3) of Regulation No 1907/2006 — Conferral of powers on EU agencies — Principle of conferral — Principle of subsidiarity — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons Articles 51 (6) and 93 (3) of REACH 20/09/2019
T-125/17 R BASF Grenzach v ECHA Interim measures — REACH — Substance triclosan — Evaluation procedure — Decision of the Board of Appeal of the ECHA — Obligation to provide certain information requiring animal testing — Application for interim measures — No urgency Art. 278 and 279 of TFEU; Art. 156 and 158 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court

Prior case
T-125/17

Pending Appeal C-565/17 P(R)

11/05/2017
T-673/13 European Coalition to End Animal Experiments v ECHA Action for annulment - REACH - Application for registration of the chemical substance triphenyl phosphate - Intervener before the Board of Appeal of ECHA - Applicant not affected directly - Concept of regulatory act - Inadmissibility Art. 263 TFEU;
Art. 114 of the Rules of Procedure 
13/03/2015

 

Categories Display

Tagged as:

(click the tag to search for relevant content)


Route: .live1