Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 926-000-9 | CAS number: 1180524-77-9
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- acute toxic class method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- female
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- other: polyethylene glycol
- Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6
- Control animals:
- no
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- other: LD50 cut-off
- Effect level:
- > 5 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- discriminating dose
- Effect level:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- no deaths
- Clinical signs:
- other: No clinical signs
- Gross pathology:
- no findings
- Other findings:
- none
- Executive summary:
The LD50 cut-off value is > 5000 mg/kg bw based on the result of a study performed according to OECD TG 423. The test dose of 2000 mg/kg was tolerated without any findings.
Reference
| Dose (mg/kg bw) | Toxicological results | Onset and duration of signs | Onset of mortality |
| (1st) 2000 | 0 / 0/ 3 | --- | --- |
| (2nd) 2000 | 0 / 0/ 3 | --- | --- |
Toxicological results:
number of dead animals / number of animals with signs after treatment / number of animals treated
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- discriminating dose
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- September 2011
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- other: acute toxic class method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Duration of exposure:
- 24 hours
- Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- no
- Statistics:
- none: limit test
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: no clinical signs, no effects on weight development and gross pathological findings
- Mortality:
- none
- Clinical signs:
- other: none
- Gross pathology:
- no noticable gross pathological findings
- Executive summary:
An acute dermal toxicity study was performed according to OECD TG 402. 2000 mg/kg of the test item was applied semiocclusive on 5 male and 5 female rats for 24 hours. No mortalities, no clinical signs, no effects on weight development and no gross pathological findings were observed during the 14 -days observation period. The resulting LD50 was therefore > 2000 mg/kg bw for both sexes combined.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- discriminating dose
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
Additional information
Acute toxicity: oral
The LD50 cut-off value is > 5000 mg/kg bw based on the result of a study performed according to OECD TG 423. The test dose of 2000 mg/kg was tolerated without any findings. Acute toxicity: InhalationNo data available Acute toxicity: dermal
An acute dermal toxicity study was performed according to OECD TG 402. 2000 mg/kg of the test item was applied semiocclusive on 5 male and 5 female rats for 24 hours. No mortalities, no clinical signs, no effects on weight development and no gross pathological findings were observed during the 14 -days observation period. The resulting LD50 was therefore > 2000 mg/kg bw for both sexes combined.
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – oral endpoint
Only one study available
Justification for selection of acute toxicity – dermal endpoint
Only one study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Acute toxicity: oral
The LD50 cut-off value is > 5000 mg/kg bw. (rat, female)
No classification required according to EU-Directive 67/548/EEC, Annex VI.
No classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, Annex I.
Acute toxicity: inhalation
No data available
No classification required according to EU-Directive 67/548/EEC, Annex VI.
No classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, Annex I.
Acute toxicity: dermal
The LD50 -value is > 2000 mg/kg bw (rat, male/female)
No classification required according to EU-Directive 67/548/EEC, Annex VI.
No classification required according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008, Annex I.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
