Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 407-560-9 | CAS number: 107934-68-9 CAF
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: short-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 17 Nov 2016 - 18 April 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Also in accordance with GLP principles.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 207 (Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- - Method of mixing into soil (if used): A defined amount of test substance was dissolved in solvent to give the test substance/solvent stock solution. An aliquot of this solution was then separately added to a certain amount of silica sand and the solvent allowed to evaporate off prior to incorporation into formulated artificial soil with deionised reverse osmosis water. These were mixed by a mixer to give the test concentration of 1000 mg/kg. The nominal moisture content was adjusted with deionized water to 40-60% by mass of the total water-holding capacity. The test medium preparation process of the blank control group was the same, but without the solvent and the test substance. The test medium preparation process of the solvent control group was the same, but without the test substance.
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): Acetone
- Evaporation of vehicle before use: yes - Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Earthworm
- Source: Jiang Su province Jurong Stock Farm
- Weight at test initiation (mean and range, SD): 300 - 600 mg
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 24h
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): same as test - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- artificial soil
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 14 d
- Test temperature:
- 20.1 - 20.3 °C
- pH:
- 6.25 - 6.35 at initiation
6.24 - 6.33 at termination - Moisture:
- 25.14 - 26.38 % at initiation
24.37 - 26.10 % at the termination - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (material, size): 1L breathable glas bottle with cover
- Amount of soil or substrate: 750g wet weight
- No. of organisms per container (treatment): 10
- No. of replicates per treatment group: 4
- No. of replicates per control: 4
- No. of replicates per vehicle control: 4
SOURCE AND PROPERTIES OF SUBSTRATE (if soil)
- Artificial soil
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: continuous illumination
- Light intensity: 592 - 622 lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : mortality on Days 7 and 14, average body weight in surviving earthworms
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: yes
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: Since no effects were recorded in the Range-finder, only one limit concentration was tested.
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: 0, 10, 100, 1000 mg/kg + solvent control
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: No mortality in any condition. Therefore, a limit test was run at 1000 mg/kg only. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Chloroacetamide routinely tested once a year (last test Oct 2016)
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Duration:
- 14 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- mortality
- Remarks on result:
- other: Highest dose tested
- Details on results:
- No mortality was recorded in the controls or in the treatment at days 7 and 14.
The average body weight decreased over the 14-day exposure in each group due to the fact that earthworms were not fed during the test. The weight decreases were similar in the different groups (blank control: 12.25%, solvent control: 11.64%, treatment: 11.57%). - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Five concentrations tested: 3.75, 7.50, 15, 30 and 60 mg/kg dry soil weight
14-day LC50 21.4 mg/kg dry soil weight.
Historical range (2009-2015): 3.1 - 30.3 mg/kg - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- The 7- and 14-day LC50s for the test substance were > 1000 mg/kg dry soil weight.
- Executive summary:
Following the OECD TG 207 and GLP principles, the acute toxicity of the test substance to Eisenia fetida was determined in a 14 -day test in artifical soil.
Based on the results of a range-finding test, it was decided to perform a limit test with one blank control group, one solvent control group and one treatement group which had each four repiclates of 10 worms. The nominal concentration of the treatment group was 1000 mg/kg dry artifical soil weight. The number of dead earthworms were determined after 7 and 14 days exposure.
The mortality of the earthworms in both the blank control group and the solvent control group was 0% (< 10%, test valid). Similarly, 0% mortality was observed in the treatment group exposed to 1000 mg/kg dry soil weight.
Under the tested condtions, the 7- and 14 -day LC50s for the test substance were > 1000 mg/kg dry soil weight.
Reference
Description of key information
OECD 207 study with Eisenia fetida showed that the EC50 / NOEC was > 1000 mg/kg soil dw.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Short-term EC50 or LC50 for soil macroorganisms:
- 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
Additional information
Following the OECD TG 207 and GLP principles, the acute toxicity of the test substance to Eisenia fetida was determined in a 14 -day test in artificial soil.
Based on the results of a range-finding test, it was decided to perform a limit test with one blank control group, one solvent control group and one treatment group which had each four replicates of 10 worms. The nominal concentration of the treatment group was 1000 mg/kg dry artificial soil weight. The number of dead earthworms were determined after 7 and 14 days exposure.
The mortality of the earthworms in both the blank control group and the solvent control group was 0% (< 10%, test valid). Similarly, 0% mortality was observed in the treatment group exposed to 1000 mg/kg dry soil weight.
Under the tested conditions, the 7- and 14 -day LC50s for the test substance were > 1000 mg/kg dry soil weight.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.