Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Partition coefficient

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
partition coefficient
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
This study was performed according to OECD Guideline 117 with GLP statement. However, as reference substances have no structural analogy with dipentamethylene thiurame hexasulphide, HPLC method should be considered as inappropriate. Indeed, compared to estimated value, the result obtained with HPLC method is overestimated.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 117 (Partition Coefficient (n-octanol / water), HPLC Method)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
HPLC method
Partition coefficient type:
octanol-water
Analytical method:
high-performance liquid chromatography
Type:
log Pow
Partition coefficient:
6.2
Temp.:
20 °C
pH:
6.96
Details on results:
see tables below

Products

Mean Retention

Time (min)

Value of log k’

Value of

log Pow

Formamide

2.233

-

-

Toluene

4.087

-0.08077899

2.7

Ethylbenzene

4.869

0.072056683

3.2

Biphenyle

5.911

0.216723002

4.0

1,2,4-trichlorobenzene

6.838

0.314340911

4.2

Phenanthrene

7.64

0.384067647

4.5

Dibenzyle

8.323

0.435728570

4.8

Triphenylamine

12.379

0.657406135

5.7

DDT

15.39

0.770136097

6.2

Values were calculated as the mean of 3 determinations

 

Using the Capacity factor k’ and the partition coefficient log Pow of the reference items, the following calibration curve was obtained:

 

log Pow= 4.134 log k’ + 2.981 r2= 0.9962

 

The following table gives the log Pow values of DIPENTAMETHYLENE THIURAM HEXASULFIDE obtained for 3 determinations:

 

Injection

Retention time (min.)

Log Pow

1

15.78

6.21

2

15.70

6.22

3

15.77

6.21

 

 It was calculated using the precedent regression equation with the corresponding retention time.

 

The mean value of the log Pow is 6.21. This result issued from the 3 determinations is in the guideline tolerance for repeatability (+/- 0.1 log units.).

Conclusions:
Validity criteria
The temperature during the measurement did not vary by more than +/- 1°C.

Repeatability
The value of log Pow derived from repeated measurements made under identical conditions and using the same set of reference substances did fall within a range of +/- 0.1 log units.

Reproducibility
If the measurements are repeated with a different set of reference substances, results may differ.
Typically, the correlation coefficient for the relationship between log k’ and log Pow for a set of test substances is around 0.9. The correlation coefficient was 0.9962.
Executive summary:

The partition coefficient of1,1-(hexasulfane-1,6-diyldicarbonothioyl)dipiperidine (DPTH) was evaluated in a study performed in accordance with OECD testing guideline 117 and GLP requirements. The partition coefficient of 1,1-(hexasulfane-1,6-diyldicarbonothioyl)dipiperidine was of 6.2. The validity criteria were fulfilled. Nevertheless, this study is disregarded because no analogous standard with reliable log Kow value is available for DPTH. Therefore, the standard calibration curve cannot be trusted.

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Log Kow (Log Pow):
6.2
at the temperature of:
20 °C

Additional information

The partition coefficient of dipentamethylene thiurame hexasulphide was evaluated in a study performed in accordance with OECD testing guideline 117 and GLP requirements. Despite the comparison with reference substances which have no structural analogy with the substance, this study is considered as key study.

The estimated value by QSAR is considered unreliable because the substance does not fall within the applicability domain of the (Q)SAR model.