Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Long-term toxicity to fish

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
fish early-life stage toxicity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Remarks:
The result was obtained from a collection of reliable data which has been subject to peer-review and in which the original data sources are traceable.The study was well documented and meets generally accepted scientifically sound principles, but was not conducted in compliance with GLP.
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Six 15L tanks fitted with egg-holding trays and downstream weirs so that gentle flow of water/test solution maintained around eggs. Fry could fall between glass rods supporting eggs, but couldn't leave tanks due to mesh screens. Opaque tanks and lids. Data provided on mortality at egg, larval and juvenile (fry) stages; length of time from hatching to full resorption of yolk; abnormalities in development.
GLP compliance:
not specified
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
- Melting point: Not reported
- Boiling point: Not reported
- Vapour pressure: Not reported
- Water solubility (under test conditions): Not reported
- Henry's law constant: Not reported
- log Pow: Not reported
- pKa: Not reported
- Stability in water: Not reported
- Stability in light: Not reported
- pH dependance on stability: Not reported

OTHER PROPERTIES (if relevant for this endpoint)
- Results of test for ready biodegradability: Not reported
- Other: Not reported
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
- Concentrations: Measured Ammonia as N (mg¯¹): Total: 0.14,2.55, 4.52, 8.00, 15.50 and 25.77
Calculated Undissociated Ammonia as N (mg¯¹): 0.022, 0.039, 0.069, 0.128 and 0.219
- Sampling method: Not reported
- Sample storage conditions before analysis: Not reported
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: Analytical grade ammonium chloride was delivered in aqueous stock solution to free-piston burettes whose action was controlled by concentric-siphon dosers (Shurben 1978). The dosers mixed the stock solution with dilution water and passed it to the test vessels.
Dilution water was a natural, hard, unchlorinated, borehole water.
Test A: eggs exposed to test material from within one day after fertilisation.
Test B: eggs exposed to test material 24 days after fertilisation when the eggs reached the eyed stage.

- Controls: One control vessel with dilution water but no test material.

- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): Not reported
Test organisms (species):
Oncorhynchus mykiss (previous name: Salmo gairdneri)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Rainbow trout
- Strain: Not reported
- Source: Not reported

METHOD FOR PREPARATION AND COLLECTION OF FERTILIZED EGGS
- Numbers of parental fish (i.e. of females used to provide required number of eggs): Not reported
- Method of collection of fertilised eggs: Not reported
- Subsequent handling of eggs: Not reported

POST-HATCH FEEDING
- Start date: Not reported
- Type/source of feed: Proprietary fry food
- Amount given: Not reported
- Frequency of feeding: Not reported
Test type:
flow-through
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
73 d
Remarks on exposure duration:
Also Test B: 49 day exposure test for eggs exposed to test material 24 days after fertilisation
Hardness:
263 +/- 2.3 as CaCO3
Test temperature:
Range 11.5 to 17.0 °C
pH:
Control: 7.52 ± 0.05
Control pH values were never more than 0.07 pH units higher than the lowest value from the test vessels.
Dissolved oxygen:
Pre-hatching stages: ≥ 95% ASV
Larval and Post larval periods: 92 and 76% ASV
Salinity:
n/a
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Measured: Total concentration of Ammonia as N (mg¯¹):: 0.14,2.55, 4.52, 8.00, 15.50 and 25.77
Calculated Concentration of Undissociated Ammonia as N (mg¯¹): 0.022, 0.039, 0.069, 0.128 and 0.219
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Embryo cups (if used, type/material, size, fill volume): Egg holding trays and downstream weirs so gentle flow of water or test solutions was maintained around the eggs.
- Test vessel: 15 litre capacity tanks
- Type (delete if not applicable): open / closed - lidded (lids partially removed before the fry began to feed independently.
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: Opaque with opaque lids. No other information.
- Aeration: Yes - no details
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): Stock solution delivered to free-piston burettes controlled by concentric-siphon dosers.
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): Dosers mixed the stock solution with dilution water and passed it to test vessels
- No. of fertilized eggs/embryos per vessel: Test A: 591-737 eggs per vessel
Test B: 136-174 eggs per vessel.
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 1
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 1
- Biomass loading rate: Not reported

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: A natural, hard, unchlorinated borehole water
- Total organic carbon: Not reported
- Particulate matter: Not reported
- Metals: Not reported
- Pesticides: Not reported
- Chlorine: Not reported
- Alkalinity: 243 +/- 3.2 mg L¯¹
- Ca/mg ratio: Not reported
- Conductivity: Not reported
- Salinity: Freshwater
- Culture medium different from test medium: Not reported
- Intervals of water quality measurement: Not reported

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Adjustment of pH: pH controlled using small additions of carbon dioxide to the aeration flow as necessary.
- Photoperiod: Not reported
- Light intensity: Not reported

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable): The following effect parameters were observed daily:
i) Mortality at egg, larval and juvenile (fry) stages
ii) The length of time from fertilisation to hatching
iii) The length of time from hatching to full resorption of yolk
iv) Abnormalities in development

POST-HATCH DETAILS
- Begin of post-hatch period: Not reported
- No. of hatched eggs (alevins)/treatment released to the test chamber: Not reported
- Release of alevins from incubation cups to test chamber on day no.: Not reported

FERTILIZATION SUCCESS STUDY
- Number of eggs used: Not reported
- Removal of eggs to check the embryonic development on day no.: Not reported
Duration:
73 d
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
0.022 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (arithm. mean)
Conc. based on:
other: dissociated ammonial as N
Basis for effect:
mortality
Duration:
73 d
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
0.027 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (arithm. mean)
Conc. based on:
other: unionised ammonia as NH3
Basis for effect:
mortality
Duration:
73 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
0.014 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (arithm. mean)
Conc. based on:
other: unionised ammonia as NH3
Basis for effect:
mortality
Details on results:
The data for periods to eyeing, hatching or resorption of yolk and for dry-matter content varied little between treatments and no concentration-related sub-lethal responses could be identified
Reported statistics and error estimates:
Not reported

Table 1. Test Conditions and responses of early life stages of rainbow trout to ammonia - mean values, with SD in parentheses

 Concentrations of ammonia as N (mg ¯¹)     Mortality % individuals entering stage         
 Total Undissociated   Egg  Yolk-sac fry  Fry  Mortality (total %*)
 Test A (started within 24 h of fertilisation)               
 0.14 (0.17)  -  8.8  1.6  2.6  12.6
 2.55 (0.41)  0.022 (0.004)  65.2  12.6  4.9  71.1
 4.52 (0.43)  0.039 (0.009)  78.5  33.6  2.7  86.1
 8.00 (0.49)  0.069 (0.013)  87.3  44.1  0  92.9
 15.50 (0.57)  0.128 (0.012)  72.1  26.8  4.7  80.6
 25.77 (1.65)  0.219 (0.040)  97.9  61.5  20.0  99.4
 Test B (started 24 days after fertilisation)            
0.19 (0.20)  -  2.2  4.0  3.6  9.5
 2.59 (0.39)  0.023 (0.004)  3.3  9.6  11.6  22.7
 4.74 (0.19)  0.041 (0.10)  3.2  5.7  2.5  11.0
 8.15 (0.49)  0.072 (0.015)  3.4  3.8  3.5  10.3
 15.72 (0.53)  0.130 (0.012)  3.4  11.2  8.3  21.3
 25.92 (2.28)  0.226 (0.046)  3.3  14.0  27.5  39.7

* The "total mortality" was calculated separately to take account of the eggs and fry removed from each vessel for the measurement of dry matter content.

Validity criteria fulfilled:
not specified
Conclusions:
A 73 day LOEC of 0.022 mg/l as N (0.027 as NH3) has been determined for the effects of undissociated ammonia on mortality of Oncorhynchus mykiss eggs, larvae and fry. A factor of 2 can be applied to the LOEC to estimate a NOEC. This gives a NOEC value of 0.014 mg NH3/L.

Description of key information

Long-term toxicity to fish: 73-day LOEC 0.027 mg NH3/l and NOEC 0.014 mg NH3/l as calculated from the LOEC with a factor of 2, (measured) (no test guideline followed), for ammonia.  

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Fresh water fish

Fresh water fish
Effect concentration:
0.014 mg/L

Additional information

Ammonia Long-Term Toxicity to Fish:

Reliable long-term data are available sourced from the Environment Agency Proposed EQS for Water Framework Directive Annex VIII Substances: Ammonia (unionised) 2007.

The lowest credible concentration of unionised ammonia at which long-term effects were found is 0.022 mg/l of nitrogen present as NH3 (0.027 mg NH3/l) when a cumulative mortality of 71 per cent was observed for eggs, larvae and fry of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) over 73 days exposure (Solbe et al, 1989). No NOEC value was derived in the study since effects were observed at the lowest exposure concentration. However, data on the concentration–response curve for similar effects in other fish have been evaluated, and these indicate 2–3 times difference in exposure concentration for a 50 per cent reduction in survival (from the controls) in such an early life stage test (EA 2007). A factor of 2 is applied to the LOEC result to estimate a NOEC, giving a long-term toxicity to fish result of 0.014 mg unionised NH3/l.

Further testing for long-term toxicity to fish is not considered necessary because:

No data are available for the registered substance, which rapidly hydrolyses to dimethylvinylsilanol and ammonia. Chemical safety assessment and PNECs are based on these hydrolysis products. Data have been read across from 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane (CAS 999-97-3) based on structural similarity and production of ammonia and trimethylsilanol (CAS 1066-40-6) in virtue of a similar log Kow to the silanol hydrolysis product dimethylvinylsilanol. Data are also read across from trimethoxy(vinyl)silane (CAS 2768-02-7), based on the presence of a vinyl group and therefore to showcase the low toxicity of the vinyl group. Therefore, the toxicity of the substance is thought to be driven by the generation of ammonia and the log Kow of the silanol hydrolysis product.

 

Ammonia is assessed separately to dimethylvinylsilanol. Data and PNEC derivation for ammonia have been taken from published sources. The data waiver is derived for the silanol hydrolysis product.

 

In accordance with Column 2 of REACH Annex IX, there is no need to further investigate the effects of this substance in a long-term aquatic toxicity to fish study because, as indicated in guidance R.7.8.4.3 (ECHA 2016), the quantitative chemical safety assessment (conducted according to Annex I of REACH) indicates that the Risk Characterisation Ratio is below 1 and therefore the risk is already adequately controlled and further testing is not justifiable.

 

The substance is highly water-soluble, has low bioavailability (based on log Kow <3 (1.5)) and there is no reason to expect any specific mechanism of toxicity beyond narcosis. Therefore, the occurrence of toxic effects that were not expressed in the existing short-term aquatic studies (conducted at concentrations up to 500 mg/l with 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane and 1000 mg/l with trimethylsilanol) would be considered unlikely.

 

Based on the short-term aquatic data set, the most sensitive trophic level is algae according to data read across from 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane, where ammonia is present to drive toxicity. Toxicity was observed below 100 mg/l. When reading across from trimethylsilanol only (structural analogue of the silanol hydrolysis product of the registered substance), the most sensitive trophic level is invertebrates. Based only on the results from trimethylsilanol, no toxicity was observed below 100 mg/l.

When reading across from trimethoxy(vinyl)silane only (where the vinyl group is present), the most sensitive trophic level is invertebrates. Based only on the results from trimethoxy(vinyl)silane, no toxicity was observed below 100 mg/l.

 

A PNEC has been derived for the purpose of chemical safety assessment. An assessment factor of 1000 was applied to derive the freshwater PNEC; this high assessment factor to derive the predicted no-effect level already reflects the typically higher value of a short-term EC50 compared to a long-term EC10. For a narcotic chemical without a specific mode of toxic action, it is unlikely that the aquatic PNEC would be significantly over-estimated using this method.

 

Overall it is concluded that the risk characterisation conclusion is sufficiently conservative in respect of any uncertainties and therefore further in vivo testing is not considered necessary or justified on ethical grounds.

 

Details on how the PNEC and the risk characterisation ratio have been derived can be found in IUCLID Section 6.0, CSR Section 7, and Chapters 9 and 10 of the Chemical Safety Report, respectively.

For the hydrolysis by-product, ammonia, reliable chronic data are available (see above). The risk characterisation ratios (RCRs) based on the aquatic PNECs for ammonia do not indicate that testing with the registered substance is required.