Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-770-8 | CAS number: 463-04-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Ames, positive in Salmonella typhimurium TA1535 with and without metabolic activation
CA, positive in CHO cells without metabolic activation
CA, negative in CHO cells with metabolic activation
Key, MLA TK +/-, positive in mammalian cell lines with and without metabolic activation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1986
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9-mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 6666 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Dimethyl Sulfoxide
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- sodium azide
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene, 4-Nitro-O-Phenylenediamine
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Remarks:
- 333 µg/well
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- The test item is positive in an bacteria reverse mutation assay with and without metabolic activation in the strain Salmonella typhimurium TA1535.
- Executive summary:
The test item has been tested for mutagenic potential in bacteria in an bacteria reverse mutation assay (Ames test) according to international accepted protocolls. The following concentrations were tested: 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 6666 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation (S9 -mix) on S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100.
The test item was positive in S. typhimurium TA 1535 at 333 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1987
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- no guideline followed
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- according to international standards
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Test chemicals were supplied under code by the National Toxicology Program chemical repository (Radian Corp., Austin, TX).
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Cloned Chinese hamster ovary cells (CHO-W-B1) were cultured in McCoy's 5a medium with 10% fetal calf serum, L-glutamine, and antibiotics.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- The S9 mix consisted of 15 µL/mL liver homogenate (from male Sprague-Dawley rats, induced with Aroclor 1254), 2.4 mg/mL NADP, and 4.5 mg/mL isocitric acid in serum-free medium
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 16 - 160 µg/mL
- Vehicle / solvent:
- and were dissolved immediately before use in water, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethanol, or acetone, in that order of preference.- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: no data
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: water, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), ethanol, or acetone, in that order of preference.
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- triethylenemelamine
- cyclophosphamide
- mitomycin C
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Cells were exposed to the test chemical for 2 hr in the presence of S9 or throughout the incubation period without S9.
Cells were collected by mitotic shake-off. Slides were stained with Giemsa and coded, and 100 cells were scored from each of the three highest dose groups having sufficient metaphases for analysis.
All types of aberrations were recorded separately, but for data analysis they were grouped into categories of "simple" (breaks and terminal deletions), "complex" (exchanges and rearrangements), "other" (includes pulverized chromosomes), and "total." Gaps and endoreduplications were recorded but were not included in the totals. We did not score aberrations in polyploid cells but used metaphases with 19-23 chromosomes (the modal number being 21).
100 cells/dose were tested - Statistics:
- For chromosome aberrations, linear regression analysis of the percentage of cells with aberrations vs the log-dose was used as the test for trend. To examine absolute increases over control levels at each dose, a binomial sampling assumption (as opposed to Poisson) was used, and the test was that described by Margolin et al [1983, pp 714-715]. The P values were adjusted by Dunnett's method to take into account the multiple dose comparisons. For data analysis, we used the "total" aberration category, and the criterion for a positive response was that the adjusted P value be <= 0.05.
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- There was a concentration-related increase in aberrations without S9; the increase in aberrations with S9 was not statistically significant.
- Conclusions:
- There was a concentration-related increase in aberrations without S9; the increase in aberrations with S9 was not statistically significant.
- Executive summary:
The registered substance was tested in a Chromosome Aberration test in CHO cells. It was tested in the concentration range 16 to 160 µg/mL. There was a concentration-related increase in aberrations without S9; the increase in aberrations with S9 was not statistically significant.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1989
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 490 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Tests Using the Thymidine Kinase Gene)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the thymidine kinase gene
- Target gene:
- TK gene
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Remarks:
- TK+/— 3.7.2C
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
S9 mix
- source of S9 : Aroclor 1254-induced male Sprague-Dawley rats.
- method of preparation of S9 mix : S9 mix was prepared according to the procedure of Clive et al. [1979]. - Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Cells at a concentration of 6x 10E5/mL (6x 10E6 cells total) were exposed for 4 hr to a range of concentrations from 0.0005 to 100 µL/mL.
The doses of chemical selected for testing were within the range yielding approximately 0-90% cytotoxicity. - Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 3-methylcholanthrene
- other: ethylmethanesulfonate (without S9)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: duplicate
METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): 12 x 10E6 cells
- Test substance added in medium; in agar (plate incorporation)
TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: 4 h at 37°C
FOR GENE MUTATION:
The mutagenicity assay was performed according to the procedure described by Clive and Spector[1975). A total of 12 x 10E6 cells in duplicate cultures were exposed to the test chemical, positive control and solvent control for 4 hr at 37° ± 1°C, washed twice with growth medium, and maintained at 37° ± 1°C for 48 hr in log-phase growth to allow recovery and mutant expression. Cells in the cultures were adjusted to 0.3 x 10E6 mL at 24-hr intervals. They were then cloned (1 X 10E6 cells/plate for mutant selection and 200 cells/plate for viable count determinations) in soft-agar medium containing Fischer's medium, 20% horse serum, 2 mM sodium pyruvate, 0.02% pluronic F-68, and 0.23% granulated agar (BBL, Inc.). Resistance to trifluorothymidine (TFT) was determined by adding TFT (final concentration, 3 µg/mL) to the cloning medium for mutant selection. The 100 x stock solution of TFT in saline was stored at —70°C and was thawed immediately prior to use. Plates were incubated at 37°C ± 1°C in 5% CO2 in air for 10-12 days and then counted with an automatic colony counter (Biotran D. New Brunswick Scientific Co., Edison, NJ). Mutant frequencies were expressed as mutants per 10E4 surviving cells, and the results were interpreted in a manner similar to that described by Clive et al. [1979].
- Statistics:
- not reported
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: within the range of approximately 0- 90 % cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- True negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- The test item is positive in a mouse lymphoma TK + /- mutagenicity assay with and without metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The test item has been assessed in a mouse lymphoma TK + /- mutagenicity assay with and without metabolic (S9 mix) activation according to international accepted protocols. It was concluded that the substance is positive with and without metabolic activation for mutagenicity in mammalian cell lines.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (positive)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Genetic toxicity in vitro_bacteria
In the key study (Mortelmans, 1986) the test item has been tested for mutagenic potential in bacteria in an bacteria reverse mutation assay (Ames test) according to international accepted protocolls. The following concentrations were tested: 10, 33, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 6666 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation (S9 -mix) on S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100.
The test item was positive in S. typhimurium TA 1535 at 333 µg/plate with and without metabolic activation.
In the supporting study the mutagenicity of the test item towards bacteria was assessed in a plate incorporation assay according to Ames et al [1975] with histidine auxotrophs Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, and TA1537. In the Salmonella assay, the chemical was tested at dose levels up to and including 10.000 µg/plate without metabolic activation and with liver S9 preparations from Sprague-Dawley rats and Syrian golden hamsters. The test item was positive in strain TA1535 in the absence and presence of metabolic activation with both rat and hamster S9. The responses obtained were more variable in strain TA100. A concentration-related increase was observed with iso-amyl nitrite. Strain TA100 was negative with metabolic activation and postive without.
Chromosome aberration in CHO cells
The registered substance was tested in a Chromosome Aberration test in CHO cells. It was tested in the dose range 16 to 160 µg/mL. There was a concentration-related increase in aberrations without S9; the increase in aberrations with S9 was not statistically significant.
Sister Chromatid Exchange Assay in CHO cells
The registered substance was tested in a Sister Chromatid Exchange Assay in CHO cells. It was tested in the concentration range 16 to 160 µg/mL. The SCE tests were positive with and without metabolic activation, although the increase with S9 was statistically significant in only one of two tests.
Mouse Lymphoma TK +/- Mutagenicity Assay
The test item has been assessed in a mouse lymphoma TK + /- mutagenicity assay with and without metabolic (S9 mix) activation according to international accepted protocols. It was concluded that the substance is positive for mutagenicity with and without metabolic activation in mammalian cell lines.
Justification for classification or non-classification
According to the positive results in the in vitro genetic toxicity studies, the test item needs to be classified as Mutagen Cat. 2 (H341: Suspected of causing genetic defects). This classification is in line with the classification in the disseminated lead substance dossier, published on the ECHA homepage.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.