Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference
Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2018-07-17 to 2018-07-20
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Version / remarks:
Council Regulation (EC) No. 266/2016
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Analytical monitoring:
yes
Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
Test concentrations (nominal):
Five concentrations were tested in a geometrical series with a dilution factor of 2: 6.25 mg/L, 12.5 mg/L, 25 mg/L, 50 mg/L, 100 mg/L corresponding to the geometric mean measured test item concentration of 2.04 mg/L, 4.32 mg/L, 13.9 mg/L, 26.4 mg/L and 54.7 mg/L. The concentrations are based on the results of a preliminary range finding test.

Preparation of the test item solutions:
All test item solutions were freshly prepared by direct addition to dilution water. An appropriate volume of the test item (density: 0.989 g/cm3 was taken into account) was placed by pipette under the water surface and the bottle was closed. The test item solutions were stirred with a magnetic stirrer at approximately 1100 rpm for 4 hours at room temperature. At start and end of the stirring period, the pH of the solutions were measured and adjusted to 7.6±0.2 if necessary. The test item solutions were checked via laser beam (Tyndall effect) for undissolved test item (formation of an emulsion). The Tyndall effect was negative for all test item concentrations.

Control: Six replicates (without test item) were exposed under the same conditions as the test concentrations.
Test organisms (species):
Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
Test organism: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata HINDAK, SAG 61.81
Synonyms: Selenastrum capricornutum; Ankistrodesmus subcapitata; Raphidocelis subcapitata; Ankistrodesmus bibraianus (Experimental Phycology and Culture of Algae at the University of Goettingen 2016)
Origin: Sammlung von Algenkulturen (SAG) Pflanzenphysiologisches Institut der Universitat Gottingen Nikolausberger Weg 18, D-37073 Gottingen
Cultivation at test facility: Fresh stocks are prepared every month on Z-Agar. Light intensity amounted to 2567 - 5130 lux for 24 hours/day
Culture medium: Nutrient medium Z according to Luttge et al (1994)
Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Hardness:
The medium has a nominal hardness of 0.24 mmol Ca+Mg/L
Test temperature:
Temperature (target) nominal range: 21-24°C, controlled at ±2°C
pH:
7.6 ± 0.2
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal: 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50 and 100 mg/L
Measured geometric mean: 2.04, 4.32, 13.9, 26.4 and 54.7 mg/L

Rang-finding test
Nominal; 1, 10 , 100 mg/l
Measured (GC-MS): Start (0 h): 0.372, 3.91, 39.1 mg/l
End (72 h): Measured (TOC) Start (0 h): End (72 h):
Details on test conditions:
Replicates: Three replicates per concentration and six for the control
Test container: Sterile Erlenmeyer flasks (vol. 250 mL) with cotton wool plugs
Test volume: 100 mL
Dilution water: According to the guidelines, pH-adjusted due to hydrolytic instability of the test item
Preculture: A four days old preculture, prepared in dilution water was used as inoculum
Initial cell density: Nominal: approximately 5000-50000 cells/mL; Current: 5523 cells/mL
Application:
Application was carried out by adding appropriate volumes of the test solutions to the replicate test vessels.
Incubation: The flasks were positioned randomly and repositioned daily
Agitation: Test containers were placed on a rotary shaker and oscillated at approximately 70 rpm
Light intensity (target): approximately 4440 to 8880 lux, corresponding to 60 to 120 µE*m-2*s-1
Light regime: 24 hours/day light
Light homogeneity (target): within ±15% over incubation area
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
Potassium dichromate
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
36.2 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: 95% CI (34.1-38.3)
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
9.39 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
4.32 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
13.9 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
10 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
cell number
Remarks on result:
other: 95% CI (7.96 - 11.8)
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
4.32 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
cell number
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
LOEC
Effect conc.:
13.9 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
cell number
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Results with reference substance valid? Yes
- EC50: Growth rate (0.574 mg/L); Yield inhibition (0.337 mg/L)

Biological data

The growth inhibition effects of the test item are summarised in Table 1. The cell densities are listed in Table 2. The evaluation of growth rate and yield inhibition are in Table 3 (calculated based on cell density values).

Microscopic evaluation of the cells at the start and end of exposure revealed no morphological abnormalities. All effect values are reported based on the geometric mean measured test item concentrations.

Table 1: NOEC, LOEC, ECx-values and 95% confidence intervals (0-72 hours) based on the geometric mean measured test item concentrations (mg/L)

 

Growth rate inhibition

NOEC

4.3

LOEC

13.9

ErC10

9.39 (6.03 – 11.7)

ErC20

16.4 (14.4 – 18.5)

ErC50

36.2 (34.1 – 38.3)

 

Yield inhibition

NOEC

4.32

LOEC

13.9

ErC10

3.02 (<2.04 – 4.89)

ErC20

5.02 (3.78 – 6.95)

ErC50

10.0 (7.96 – 11.8)

 

Table 2: Cell densities

Geometric mean measured test item concentration

Replicate

Cell densities (cells/mL)

(mg/L)

No.

0 hours

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

54.7

1

2

3

Mean

5523

5523

5523

5523

7304

6978

7607

7296

10035

9884

12546

10822

20456

20629

25615

22233

26.4

1

2

3

Mean

5523

5523

5523

5523

11176

11319

10460

10985

39708

31361

33238

34769

330381

299858

286226

305488

13.9

1

2

3

Mean

5523

5523

5523

5523

13628

12912

16033

14191

63551

54370

72392

63438

586122

574837

710980

623980

4.32

1

2

3

Mean

5523

5523

5523

5523

26425

19394

28489

24769

229907

163319

235932

209719

1896760

1524557

1751948

1724422

2.04

1

2

3

Mean

5523

5523

5523

5523

24185

25588

20313

23362

199008

221007

192904

204306

2037126

1856063

1653267

1848819

Control

1

2

3

4

5

6

Mean

5523

5523

5523

5523

5523

5523

5523

35698

29840

29739

30260

30998

27156

30615

288444

278921

271108

262850

266406

267690

272570

1970055

1995836

2155662

2020729

1967141

1954793

2010703

 

Table 3: Evaluation after 72 hours

Statistically significant differences of growth rates and yield compared to control values are marked (+), not significant differences are marked (-)

Geometric mean measured test item concentration

Replicate

Growth rate

Inhibition growth rate

Yield

Inhibition of yield

(mg/L)

No.

(d-1)

(%)

(cells/mL)

(%)

54.7

1

2

3

Mean

0.436

0.439

0.511

(+) 0.462

78

78

74

76

14933

15106

20092

(+) 16710

99

99

99

99

26.4

1

2

3

Mean

1.36

1.33

1.32

(+) 1.34

31

32

33

33

324858

294335

280703

(+) 299965

84

85

86

85

13.9

1

2

3

Mean

1.55

1.55

1.62

(+) 1.57

21

21

18

20

580599

569314

705457

(+) 618457

71

72

65

69

4.32

1

2

3

Mean

1.95

1.87

1.92

(-) 1.91

1

5

2

3

1891237

1519034

1746425

(-) 1718899

6

24

13

14

2.04

1

2

3

Mean

1.97

1.94

1.90

(-) 1.94

0

1

3

1

2031603

1850540

1647744

(-) 1843296

-1

8

18

8

Control

1

2

3

4

5

6

Mean

1.96

1.96

1.99

1.97

1.96

1.96

1.97

 

1964532

1990313

2150139

2015206

1961618

1949270

2005180

 

 

Table 4: Section-by-Section and Average Specific Growth Rates of the Control Group (0-72 hours)

 

Replicate

Specific growth rate (d-1) section-by-section

Mean (0-72 hours)

SD±

CV (%)

Mean CV (%)

 

No.

0-24 hours

24-48 hours

48-72 hours

Control

1

1.87

2.09

1.92

1.96

0.116

5.9

12.4

2

1.69

2.24

1.97

1.96

0.274

14.0

3

1.68

2.21

2.07

1.99

0.273

13.7

4

1.70

2.16

2.04

1.97

0.239

12.1

5

1.73

2.15

2.00

1.96

0.216

11.0

6

1.59

2.29

1.99

1.96

0.349

17.8

 

 

 

 

Mean SD±CV (%0

1.97

0.01

0.62

 

 

 

 

Physicochemical data

The environmental conditions (pH-value, room temperature, light intensity) were determined to be within the acceptable limits, Table 5. The test media were clear throughout the exposure phase.

Table 5: Environmental conditions

Geometric mean measured test item concentration

pH-values

(mg/L)

Start; 0 hours

End; 72 hours

54.7

7.43

7.53

26.4

7.45

7.80

13.9

7.47

7.98

4.32

7.49

8.32

2.04

7.53

8.40

Control

7.60

8.57

Room temperature (°C): min 21.5

max: 22.5

mean value: 22.0

Light intensity (lux) n =28

mean value: 5957

range of the measured values: 5130 to 6726

equalling -13.9 to 12.9%

CV (%): 6.52

 

Measured concentrations of total organic carbon during the definitive test

The total organic carbon (TOC) was determined at the start and end of the exposure. The results are in Table 6

Table 6: TOC content of the test media at the start and end of exposure

Sampling date

2018-07-17

0 hour

Start of exposure

2018-07-20

72 hours

End of exposure

Date of analysis

2018-07-17

2018-07-20

Geometric mean measured test item concentration (mg/L)

TOC (mg C/L)

Meas. TOC (mg C/L)

Calc. TOC (mg/L)

Meas. TOC (mg C/L)

Calc. TOC (mg/L)

54.7

46.5

43.9

33.7

32.7

26.4

23.2

20.6

16.6

15.6

13.9

13.1

10.5

7.78

6.78

4.32

5.96

<LOQ

4.30

3.30

2.04

3.18

<LOQ

2.14

<LOQ

Control (Rep. 1,2,3)

3.01

3.11

1.65

-

1.03

1.01

0.97

-

Control (Mean)

2.59

-

1.00

-

Control (±SD)

0.816

-

0.031

-

LOQ

9.93

-

1.28

-

Meas. TOC = Measured TOC concentration, mean value of 2 injections

Calc. TOC = Calculated TOC (attributed to the test item) = measured TOC – background (mean value for the control)

The limit of quantification (LOQ) was calculated as follows: LOQ = mean value (control) + 9 x standard deviation

Measured exposure concentrations during definitive test

The concentrations of the test item were determined at the start of the exposure (0 hour) and at the end of the exposure (72 hours) of all tested concentrations and the control by GC-MS.

The measured concentrations of the test item at the start of exposure were in the range 72 to 95% of the nominal concentrations of the test item. At the end of the exposure, the measured concentrations were between 15 and 35% of the nominal concentrations of the test item. The geometric mean measured concentrations were calculated. Results are in Table 7

Table 7: Measured concentrations of the test item concentration in fresh medium (0 hour) and old medium (72 hours) with algae

 

Sampling date

Fresh media, 0 hour

Old media, 72 hours

Geometric mean measured concentrations

Nominal test item concentration (mg/L)

Meas. conc. (mg/L)

(%)

Meas. conc. (mg/L)

(%)

(mg/L)

100

84.6

85

35.3

35

54.7

50.0

43.7

87

16.0

32

26.4

25.0

23.7

95

8.13

33

13.9

12.5

10.3

82

1.82

15

4.32

6.25

4.52

72

0.924

15

2.04

Control

<LOQ

<LOQ

<LOQ

Meas. conc. = Measured concentration of the test item (enrichment and dilution factor taken into account)

% = Percent of the nominal concentration of the test item

LOQ = Limit of Quantification (0.008 mg test item/L)

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
A 72 h ErC50 value of 36.2 mg/L, ErC10 value of 9.39 mg/l and NOEC value of 4.32 mg/l have been determined for the effects of the test substance on growth rate inhibition of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, based on geometric mean measured concentrations. The result is considered to be reliable.

Description of key information

Algal inhibition: 72 hour EC50 36.2 mg/l and ErC10 9.39 mg/l, effects of parent substance on growth rate of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

EC50 for freshwater algae:
36.2 mg/L
EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
9.39 mg/L

Additional information

A 72-hour ErC50 value of 36.2 mg/l, ErC10 value of 9.39 mg/l and NOEC value of 4.32 mg/l have been determined for the effects of the test substance on growth rate inhibition of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, based on geometric mean measured concentrations (Noack, 2018).

Degradation due to hydrolysis in the test media was observed. The adjustment of pH to as close to neutral as reasonably possible was designed to maintain maximum exposure to the parent test substance. However, due to the static regime of the algal test, and the fact that the growth of algae can increase test media pH, loss of parent test substance by degradation was significant. An average of 84% of nominal test substance concentration was determined at the start of the test, but this decreased to 26% in the old media at 72 hours. The test organisms were therefore exposed predominantly to the parent substance at the beginning of the test, but by the end of the test the algae were exposed predominantly to the hydrolysis products.

To support the measured data, a 96-hour EC50 value of 4.1 mg/l has been estimated for the effects of 3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate on freshwater algae. It can be seen that the EC50 predicted by QSAR seems to be conservative in comparison to the experimental data.

Reliable existing test results are available for the silanol hydrolysis product, based on studies conducted with the analogous substance 3-trimethoxysilylpropyl methacrylate (CAS 2530-85-0), and are included as supporting read-across evidence. The results may be expressed in terms of concentration of the hydrolysis product, 3-(trihydroxysilyl)propyl methacrylate, by applying a molecular weight correction: (MW of silanol = 206.27 / MW of parent = 248.35) * [Conc. of parent] = [conc. of silanol]. Using this method, the results are as follows: Algae: EC50 (72 h): >83 mg/l and >445 mg/l; NOEC: ≥83 mg/l and 267 mg/l (results re-calculated with molecular weight adjustment and expressed as concentration of 3-(trihydroxysilyl)propyl methacrylate).