Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
surface tension
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
07 Apr - 11 May 2015
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Test procedure in accordance wtih national standard methods under GLP.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2015
Report date:
2015

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 115 (Surface Tension of Aqueous Solutions)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method A.5 (Surface Tension)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of method:
OECD harmonised ring method

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
procrylat
IUPAC Name:
procrylat
Details on test material:

- Name of test material (as cited in study report): MTDID 9115
- Physical state: Clear colourless to yellowish liquid
- Analytical purity: 96%
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 24 November 2015
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature

Results and discussion

Surface tension
Surface tension:
73.4 mN/m
Temp.:
20 °C
Conc.:
90 other: % of the saturation concenteration

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The surface tension of procrylat at 90% of saturation in water and at 20 °C was 73.4 mN/m as determined by the OECD 115 method.
Executive summary:

The surface tension of procrylat was tested using the OECD harmonized ring method. The surface tension was determined as the mean of five measurements done under comparable conditions. The study was conducted in accordance with the OECD 115 method and was GLP compliant; therefore the study is considered reliable without restrictions.