Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 252-558-1 | CAS number: 35435-21-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse mutation assay / Ames test): negative
with and without metabolic activation in all strains tested (OECD Test
Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP) (RCC Cytotest Cell Research,
1998).
Cytogenicity in mammalian cells: negative with and without metabolic in
Chinese lung fibroblasts (V79) (OECD Test Guideline 473 and in
compliance with GLP) (BSL Bioservice, 2001e).
Mutagenicity in mammalian cells: read across from structural analogue
triethoxy(octyl)silane (CAS 2943-75-1): negative with and without
metabolic activation in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells (OECD Test Guideline
476 and in compliance with GLP) (BSL Bioservice, 2012).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1998-03-24 to 1998-04-06
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital and Beta-Naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 33-5000 µg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: Solubility properties and relative non-toxicity to bacteria. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA 1535, TA 100 (without activation)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 4-nitro-o-phenylene-diamine
- Remarks:
- TA 1537, TA 98 (without activation)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- TA 102 (without activation)
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- All strains (with activation)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- ACTIVATION: Phenobarbital and beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9 mix containing NADP as cofactor: Mix was 15% S9, 500 µl were mixed into a total volume of 2,700 µl prior to pouring giving a final concentration of approximately 1.2% S9.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation); Preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 60 minutes
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plates for each test concentration. The initial plate incorporation experiment was repeated using the preincubation method.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: Background lawn evaluation, revertant colony counts - Evaluation criteria:
- The test substance is considered positive if there is a reproducible dose related increase in revertants, or reproducible increase in one test concentration.
A result is positive if the number of revertants is significantly increased compared with the solvent control to at least 2-fold of the solvent control for TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 and 3-fold of the solvent control for TA 1535 and TA 1537 in both experiments.
Cytotoxicity is defined as a reduction in the number of colonies compared with the solvent control and/or a sparse background lawn. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Results were within range of historical control data
- Conclusions:
- Triethoxy(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)silane has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria in a valid and reliable study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP. No mutagenic effect was observed for the test substance tested up to limit concentration in any of the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in a plate incorporation experiment without and with metabolic activation. The result was confirmed in an independent pre-incubation assay. Appropriate positive, negative and solvent controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000-11-02 to 2001-02-06
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.10 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5375 - In vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Beta-Napthoflavone and Phenobarbital induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1, -S9: 500, 2000, 5000 µg/ml
Experiment 1, +S9: 250, 200, 5000 µg/ml
Experiment 2, -S9: 50, 200, 500 µg/ml - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Cell culture medium. The test substance was prepared and diluted in cell culture medium. Freshly prepared solutions (applied within 1 h after preparation) were used.
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- ACTIVATION: S9 mix contained 0.75 mg/ml protein and NADP as cofactor. 50 µl were added to test organisms, test or control substance and medium in each chamber of Quadriperm dishes.
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours with and without S9 (exp 1); 20 hours without S9 (exp 2)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 16 hours (exp 1); 20 hours (exp 2)
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 2 days
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 17.5 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemide
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): Giesma
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: At least 200 per concentration
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; relative total growth
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: determined in 100 cells per culture of each test group - Evaluation criteria:
- A positive result is determined by a dose related increase in the number of cells with aberration, and a biologically relevant positive response for at least one of the test points.
The number of aberrations found in the negative control should be between 0 % and 4.5 %. The positive control should produce biologically relevant increases in the number of cells with structural chromosome aberrations. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 500 μg/ml (exp 2, 20 h treatment without activation)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: noted in experiment 2 at 5000 μg/ml, 500 μg/ml selected as top concentration for evaluation in that experiment.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: Results were within range of historical control data - Conclusions:
- Triethoxy(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)silane has been tested for clastogenicity in a valid and reliable test performed according to OECD Test Guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP. The test substance did not induce structural chromosomal aberrations in the V79 Chinese hamster cell line with and without metabolic activation when tested up to limit concentrations. Appropriate solvent and postive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of chromosome aberrations under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2011-12-21 to 2012-03-20
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5300 - In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: IWGT Recommendations
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- (Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, Germany)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Thymidine kinase
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI
- Properly maintained: Yes
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Liver S9 of Wistar Phenobarbital and ß-Naphthoflavone-induced rat liver S9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Pre-expt I: 0.2, 0.5, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10.0 mM (+/-MA); Pre-expt II: 0.01, 0.1, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, 10.0 mM (-MA, 24 h exp); Expt I: 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 7.5 and 10.0 mM (+/-MA); Expt II: 0.15, 0.3, 0.7, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0 and 10.0 mM (+MA); 0.001, 0.002, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.05, 0.10 and 0.20 mM (-MA)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- THF was used as solvent (0.35% THF v/v in the samples). To reach a final concentration of 0.35% THF v/v in the samples the test item stock solution was diluted in RPMI + 5% HS for short-term exposure or RPMI + 7.5% HS for long-term exposure. After adding the THF stock solution to cell culture medium precipitate formed.
The solvent was compatible with the survival of the cells and the activity of the S9 mix. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- THF
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- benzo(a)pyrene
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation: 3.5 µg/mL
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation: 200 µg/mL and 300 µg/mL
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation: 10 µg/mL
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: dissolved in THF (0.35% THF v/v in the samples)
DURATION: 4 h (short-term exposure), 24 h (long-term exposure)
Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 h
Selection time (if incubation with selection agent): about 14 days
SELECTION AGENT ( mutation assay) 5 µg/ml trifluorothymidine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: two separate experiments (I+II) with single exposure; cells were seeded in 4 plates and evaluated
NUMBER OF CELLS SEEDED: 2000 cells per well
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY: relative total growth (RTG)
ACTIVATION: S9 mix contained glucose-6-phosphate and NADP as co-factors, and sufficient S9 to give a final protein concentration in the cultures of 0.75 mg/ml - Evaluation criteria:
- The test item is considered mutagenic if following criteria are met:
-The induced mutant frequency meets or exceeds the Global Evaluation factor (GEF) of 126 per 10^6 cells
- A dose-dependent increase in mutant frequency is detected.
Besides, combined with a positive effect in the mutant frequency, an increased occurrence of small colonies (≥40% of total colonies) is an indication for potential clastogenic effects and/or chromosomal aberrations.
According to the OECD guideline, the biological relevance is considered first for the interpretation of results. Statistical methods might be used as an aid in evaluation the test result.
A test item is considered to be negative if the induced mutant frequency is below the GEF and the trend test is negative. - Statistics:
- The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test is applied to the mutation data to prove the dose groups for any significant difference in mutant frequency compared to the negative /solvent controls.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- RTG of 14.6% and 9.7% without metabolic activation.
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Triethoxy(octyl)silane has been tested for mutagenicity to mammalian cells in a reliable study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 476 and in compliance with GLP. No biologically relevant increase in mutation rate was found in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells with or without metabolic activation in either the initial or the repeat experiment, up to limit and cytotoxic concentrations. The global evaluation factor was not exceeded at any concentration. In addition, colony sizing showed no clastogenic effects in either experiment. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to mammalian cells under the conditions of the test.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 2: Dose range-finding study Number of revertants per plate
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
|||||
Concentration (μg/Plate) |
Plate 1 + MA |
Plate 2 - MA |
Cytotoxic (Yes/No) |
Plate 1 + MA |
Plate 2 - MA |
Cytotoxic (Yes/No) |
Negative control* |
41 |
21 |
No |
148 |
137 |
No |
0** |
26 |
23 |
No |
137 |
117 |
No |
3 |
30 |
20 |
No |
124 |
107 |
No |
10 |
33 |
23 |
No |
106 |
94 |
No |
33 |
36 |
19 |
No |
126 |
108 |
No |
100 |
30 |
23 |
No |
113 |
114 |
No |
333 |
30 |
20 |
No |
116 |
111 |
No |
1000 |
36 |
28 |
No |
153 |
117 |
No |
2500 |
24 |
23 |
No |
147 |
117 |
No |
5000 |
34 |
16 |
No |
156 |
118 |
No |
Positive control |
286 |
609 |
No |
405 |
982 |
No |
*negative control with water
**solvent control with DMSO
Table 3: Experiment 1 Plate incorporation Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA102 |
||||||
Conc. |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
Negative control* |
21 |
41 |
No |
137 |
148 |
No |
192 |
249 |
No |
0** |
23 |
26 |
No |
117 |
137 |
No |
178 |
273 |
No |
33 |
19 |
36 |
No |
108 |
126 |
No |
169 |
209 |
No |
100 |
23 |
30 |
No |
114 |
113 |
No |
163 |
206 |
No |
333 |
20 |
30 |
No |
111 |
116 |
No |
158 |
227 |
No |
1000 |
28 |
36 |
No |
117 |
153 |
No |
169 |
234 |
No |
2500 |
23 |
24 |
No |
117 |
147 |
No |
161 |
202 |
No |
5000 |
16 |
34 |
No |
118 |
156 |
No |
196 |
280 |
No |
Positive control |
609 |
286 |
No |
982 |
405 |
No |
983 |
1153 |
No |
*negative control with water
**solvent control with DMSO
Table 3: Experiment 1 Plate incorporation Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
|
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
||||
Conc. |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
Negative control* |
12 |
9 |
No |
18 |
14 |
No |
0** |
15 |
10 |
No |
14 |
14 |
No |
33 |
20 |
14 |
No |
15 |
17 |
No |
100 |
19 |
11 |
No |
12 |
12 |
No |
333 |
23 |
11 |
No |
13 |
13 |
No |
1000 |
16 |
18 |
No |
13 |
15 |
No |
2500 |
17 |
14 |
No |
12 |
13 |
No |
5000 |
14 |
15 |
No |
13 |
15 |
No |
Positive control |
1024 |
147 |
No |
153 |
112 |
No |
*negative control with water
**solvent control with DMSO
Table 4: Experiment 2 Preincubation Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
|
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA102 |
||||||
Conc. |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
Negative control* |
29 |
52 |
No |
159 |
156 |
No |
279 |
245 |
No |
0** |
25 |
49 |
No |
147 |
166 |
No |
285 |
251 |
No |
33 |
31 |
54 |
No |
139 |
169 |
No |
237 |
231 |
No |
100 |
30 |
51 |
No |
137 |
165 |
No |
275 |
254 |
No |
333 |
29 |
49 |
No |
122 |
160 |
No |
227 |
258 |
No |
1000 |
30 |
49 |
No |
139 |
166 |
No |
222 |
252 |
No |
2500 |
32 |
43 |
No |
128 |
175 |
No |
236 |
276 |
No |
5000 |
28 |
51 |
No |
134 |
157 |
No |
231 |
243 |
No |
Positive control |
630 |
267 |
No |
1236 |
688 |
No |
1496 |
1049 |
No |
*negative control with water
**solvent control with DMSO
Table 4: Experiment 2 Preincubation Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
|
TA1535 |
TA1537 |
||||
Conc. |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
— MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
Negative control* |
26 |
16 |
No |
11 |
25 |
No |
0** |
29 |
13 |
No |
11 |
22 |
No |
33 |
22 |
18 |
No |
10 |
24 |
No |
100 |
21 |
16 |
No |
9 |
30 |
No |
333 |
22 |
16 |
No |
7 |
23 |
No |
1000 |
20 |
18 |
No |
9 |
18 |
No |
2500 |
21 |
11 |
No |
9 |
16 |
No |
5000 |
17 |
17 |
No |
6 |
18 |
No |
Positive control |
847 |
121 |
No |
128 |
126 |
No |
*negative control with water
**solvent control with DMSO
Table 2: Results of chromosome analysis Experiment 1, 4h treatment without activation (total count from 2 cultures)
|
Solvent* Control |
Positive Control |
Low dose 500 μg/ml |
Medium dose 2000 μg/ml |
High dose 5000 μg/ml |
|
Cytotoxicity |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
|
Mean |
|||||
Chromatid aberrations |
gaps |
3 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
deletions |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
|
interchanges |
0 |
21 |
0 |
1 |
2 |
|
Chromosome |
gaps |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
deletions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
interchanges |
0 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mitotic index |
100 % |
103 % |
140 % |
116 % |
86 % |
|
Polyploidy |
6 |
7 |
1.5 |
1 |
4 |
|
Endo reduplication |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
*Solvent control with culture medium
ND not determined
Table 3: Results of chromosome analysis Experiment 1, 4h treatment with activation (total count from 2 cultures)
|
Solvent* Control |
Positive Control |
Low dose 250 μg/ml |
Medium dose 2000 μg/ml |
High dose 5000 μg/ml |
|
Cytotoxicity |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
|
Mean |
|||||
Chromatid aberrations |
gaps |
2 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
deletions |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
interchanges |
2 |
17 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Chromosome |
gaps |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
deletions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
interchanges |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mitotic index |
100 % |
126 % |
93 % |
95 % |
83 % |
|
Polyploidy |
3.5 |
5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
2 |
|
Endo reduplication |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
*Solvent control with culture medium
ND not determined
Table 4: Results of chromosome analysis Experiment 2, 20h treatment without activation (total count from 2 cultures)
|
Solvent* Control |
Positive Control |
Low dose 50 μg/ml |
Medium dose 200 μg/ml |
High dose 500 μg/ml |
|
Cytotoxicity |
No |
Yes |
No |
No |
Yes |
|
|
Mean |
|||||
Chromatid aberrations |
gaps |
1 |
11 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
deletions |
0 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
interchanges |
0 |
35 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Chromosome |
gaps |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
deletions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
interchanges |
0 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mitotic index |
100 % |
51 % |
91 % |
85 % |
29 % |
|
Polyploidy |
3.5 |
2.5 |
4.5 |
1.5 |
3 |
|
Endo reduplication |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
ND |
*Solvent control with culture medium
ND not determined
Pre-experiment for toxicity with and without metabolic activation
Concentration (mM) |
Number of cells 4 h after treatment |
Number of cells 24 h after treatment |
Number of cells 48 h after treatment |
Suspension growth |
Relative suspension growth |
|||||
|
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
Negative control |
271000 |
278000 |
946000 |
948000 |
1600000 |
1570000 |
15.1 |
14.9 |
89.8 |
103.6 |
307000 |
356000 |
1050000 |
1150000 |
1510000 |
1540000 |
15.9 |
17.7 |
94.1 |
123.3 |
|
Solvent control |
307000 |
256000 |
104000 |
807000 |
1560000 |
1570000 |
16.2 |
12.7 |
100.0 |
100.0 |
339000 |
313000 |
112000 |
101000 |
1560000 |
1590000 |
17.5 |
16.1 |
|||
0.2 |
284000 |
271000 |
77000 |
593000 |
1540000 |
1480000 |
11.9 |
8.8 |
70.4 |
61.1 |
0.5 |
307000 |
252000 |
876000 |
377000 |
1490000 |
1190000 |
13.1 |
4.5 |
77.5 |
31.2 |
2.5 |
289000 |
220000 |
728000 |
186000 |
1620000 |
637000 |
11.8 |
1.9 |
70.0 |
13.3 |
5.0 |
316000 |
225000 |
798000 |
137000 |
1550000 |
286000 |
12.4 |
0.9 |
73.4 |
6.0 |
7.5 (P) |
303000 |
271000 |
650000 |
239000 |
1590000 |
850000 |
10.3 |
2.6 |
61.3 |
17.8 |
10.0 (P) |
305000 |
244000 |
728000 |
183000 |
1580000 |
481000 |
11.5 |
1.4 |
68.3 |
10.0 |
Summary: Experiment 1 and 2 with metabolic activation
|
Treatment (mM) |
RTG (%) |
MF (mutants/106cells) |
IMF (mutants/106cells) |
Precipitate |
|
Negative control |
103.5 |
125.6 |
/ |
- |
|
98.1 |
/ |
- |
||
|
Solvent control |
100.0 |
135.2 |
/ |
- |
|
/ |
- |
|||
|
0.1 |
72.3 |
142.3 |
7.2 |
- |
Exp 1 |
0.2 |
73.5 |
143.3 |
8.1 |
- |
|
0.5 |
84.9 |
97.1 |
-38.1 |
- |
|
1.0 |
63.7 |
182.8 |
47.6 |
- |
|
2.5 |
67.1 |
144.4 |
9.2 |
- |
|
5.0 |
87.2 |
117.6 |
-17.6 |
- |
|
7.5 |
78.1 |
154.8 |
19.6 |
- |
|
10.0 |
74.3 |
130.3 |
-4.8 |
+ |
|
Positive control |
38.4 |
918.4 |
783.2 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment (mM) |
RTG (%) |
MF (mutants/106cells) |
IMF (mutants/106cells) |
Precipitate |
|
Negative control |
98.9 |
116.5 |
/ |
- |
|
111.8 |
/ |
- |
||
|
Solvent control |
100.0 |
116.7 |
/ |
- |
|
/ |
- |
|||
|
0.15 |
111.4 |
105.1 |
-11.6 |
- |
Exp 2 |
0.3 |
96.2 |
131.1 |
14.4 |
- |
|
0.7 |
75.7 |
128.5 |
11.8 |
- |
|
2.0 |
42.3 |
220.5 |
103.8 |
- |
|
4.0 |
72.7 |
138.8 |
22.2 |
- |
|
6.0 |
58.9 |
170.6 |
53.9 |
- |
|
8.0 |
74.1 |
134.6 |
17.9 |
+ |
|
10.0 |
76.4 |
154.9 |
38.2 |
+ |
|
Positive control |
50.5 |
1141.0 |
1024.3 |
- |
MF - mutant frequency
IMF = induced mutant frequency
RTG = relative total growth
Summary: Experiment 1 and 2 without metabolic activation
|
Treatment (mM) |
RTG (%) |
MF (mutants/106cells) |
IMF (mutants/106cells) |
Precipitate |
|
Negative control |
122.0 |
142.0 |
/ |
- |
|
129.6 |
/ |
- |
||
|
Solvent control |
100.0 |
144.3 |
/ |
- |
|
/ |
- |
|||
|
0.1 |
100.3 |
177.2 |
32.9 |
- |
Exp 1 |
0.2 |
87.3 |
157.4 |
13.0 |
- |
|
0.5 |
98.4 |
186.0 |
41.6 |
- |
|
1.0 |
49.2 |
190.1 |
45.7 |
- |
|
2.5 |
37.8* |
179.4 |
35.1 |
- |
|
5.0 |
37.2 |
179.3 |
35.0 |
- |
|
7.5 |
17.1 |
224.1 |
79.8 |
+ |
|
10.0 |
14.6 |
264.7 |
120.4 |
+ |
|
Positive control 1 |
75.1 |
817.6 |
673.2 |
- |
|
Positive control 2 |
85.2 |
564.1 |
419.7 |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment (mM) |
RTG (%) |
MF (mutants/106cells) |
IMF (mutants/106cells) |
Precipitate |
|
Negative control |
145.4 |
110.6 |
/ |
- |
|
122.8 |
/ |
- |
||
|
Solvent control |
100.0 |
109.3 |
/ |
- |
|
/ |
- |
|||
|
0.001 |
114.6 |
108.6 |
-0.8 |
- |
Exp 2 |
0.002 |
99.3 |
94.7 |
-14.6 |
- |
|
0.005 |
103.4 |
120.0 |
10.6 |
- |
|
0.01 |
62.1 |
121.8 |
12.5 |
- |
|
0.02 |
82.5 |
160.0 |
50.6 |
- |
|
0.05 |
98.6 |
108.4 |
-0.9 |
- |
|
0.10 |
16.8 |
173.0 |
63.6 |
- |
|
0.20 |
0.9 |
119.1 |
9.7 |
- |
|
Positive control 1 |
21.3 |
2373.6 |
2264.2 |
- |
|
Positive control 2 |
14.7 |
1826.6 |
1717.3 |
- |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
Micronucleus assay oral study in mouse: Negative (OECD Test Guideline
474 and in compliance with GLP) (BSL Bioservice, 2001)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000-11-27 to 2001-01-15
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- NMRI
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Winkelman (D-33178, Borchen)
- Weight at study initiation: 24 - 42 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes, under following basis: assigned and tail tagged by chance
- Housing: Macrolon Type III (Hereto, D-79302 Emmendingen)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: minimum of 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 - 25 ˚c
- Humidity (%): 49.5 - 61 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 hrs dark / 12 hrs light
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: 15 January 2001 - Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The vehicle was chosen because it is relatively non toxic to the test animals
- Lot/batch no. (if required): 36H0738 - Details on exposure:
- Route of exposure: Oral
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 - 48 hours
- Frequency of treatment:
- The animals received the test item once orally.
- Post exposure period:
- Animals were sacrificed 24 - 48 h after treatment.
- Dose / conc.:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- five
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Positive control(s):
- - cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): standard guideline positive control
- Route of administration: oral
- Doses / concentrations: 10 ml/kg bw of 0.9 % solution in 0.9 % NaCl - Tissues and cell types examined:
- Bone marrow
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: limit dose
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES (in addition to information in specific fields): no further information
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: centrifuged cells were suspended in a thin layer of FCS and smeared on a slide. The smears were air dried and stained with May-Grunwald (Merck, D-64293 Darmstadt) / Giemsa (Merck, D-64293 Darmstadt).
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: microscopic examination. 2000 PCE scored for incidence of polychromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei. Ratio of PCE / NCE was scored based on 1000 erythrocytes (PCE+NCE) - Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as mutagenic if it induces either a statistically significant dose related increase in the number of micronucleated polychromatic erythrocytes or a reproducible statistically significant positive response for at least one of the test points.
- Statistics:
- Micronuclei in 2000 PCE per animal were counted for each sex. NCE per 1000 PCE, Sum and Mean calculated for each sex.
- Key result
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- See table 3
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): negative
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): see table 3. The PCE/NCE ratio was unchanged in treated animals, so there is no evidence that the test substance reached the target tissue.
- Appropriateness of dose levels and route: appropriate dose and route
- Statistical evaluation: no statistically significant induction of micronuclei occurred. - Conclusions:
- Triethoxy(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)silane has been tested in a reliable in vivo mouse micronucleus assay according to OECD Test Guideline 474 and in compliance with GLP. No statistically significant increase in the number of cells with micronuclei was observed after oral administration of the limit dose of 2000 mg/kg bw. Appropriate positive and vehicle controls were included and gave expected results. The PCE / NCE ratio was slightly affected in treated males, indicating that the test item was of low toxicity to the target tissue. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction in micronuclei under the conditions of the test.
Reference
Table 3: Results of in vivo micronucleus test
|
Vehicle Control |
Positive Control |
200 mg/kg bw |
1000 mg/kg bw |
2000 mg/kg bw |
2000 mg/kg bw |
|
Number of cells evaluated |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
|
Sampling time (h) |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
48 |
|
Number of erythrocytes |
normochromatic |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
polychromatic |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
2000 |
|
polychromatic with micronuclei |
7 Male 5.2 Female |
70.2 Male 42.4 Female |
7.6 Male 9.2 Female |
8.4 Male 4.8 Female |
9.4 Male 5.0 Female |
7.4 Male 4.8 Female |
|
Ratio of erythrocytes |
polychromatic / normochromatic |
Male 1000/679.4 Female 1000/766.6 |
Male 1000/608 Female 1000/657.6 |
Male 1000/712.4 Female 1000/655.8 |
Male 1000/656.4 Female 1000/611.6 |
Male 1000/657 Female 1000/641.2 |
Male 1000/1064.6 Female 1000/511 |
polychromatic with micronuclei / normochromatic |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Information is available for the registered substance, triethoxy(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)silane, from reliable studies for in vitro mutagenicity to bacteria and cytogenicity, and from an in vivo micronucleus assay. No information is available for the registered substance for in vitro mutagencicity to mammalian cells, however, data are available for the structural analogue, triethoxy(octyl)silane. See attachment to Section 13 for justification of read-across.
Triethoxy(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)silane has been tested for mutagenicity to bacteria in a valid and reliable study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP. No mutagenic effect was observed for the test substance tested up to limit concentration in any of the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102 in a plate incorporation experiment without and with metabolic activation. The result was confirmed in an independent pre-incubation assay. Appropriate positive, negative and solvent controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to bacteria under the conditions of the test (RCC Cytotest Cell Research, 1998).
Triethoxy(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)silane has been tested for clastogenicity in a valid and reliable test performed according to OECD Test Guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP. The test substance did not induce structural chromosomal aberrations in the V79 Chinese hamster cell line with and without metabolic activation when tested up to limit concentrations. Appropriate solvent and postive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction of chromosome aberrations under the conditions of the test (BSL Bioservice, 2001e).
An additional study for in vitro cytogenicity is available (Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, 2001b). This study reported a positive result in Chinese hamster fibrobalsts (V79 cells) in the absence of metabolic activation. The study report available for this result is an extended summary, and does not include tables of results, so there is not enough information to for a full independent assessment, but it is noted by the reviewer that the test substance was much more cytotoxic in the absence of activation, and the increase in abnormalities recorded was most marked at cytotoxic concentrations. In addition, the test substance is reported to be a mixture of 2,4,4-trimethylpentyltriethoxysilane and 5,5-dimethylhexyltriethoxysilane. In view of these factors, the availability of a reliable negative result in a similar study and the negative result in vivo, the study with the negative result was chosen as key.
The structural analogue, triethoxy(octyl)silane has been tested for mutagenicity to mammalian cells in a reliable study conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 476 and in compliance with GLP. No biologically relevant increase in mutation rate was found in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells with or without metabolic activation in either the initial or the repeat experiment, up to limit and cytotoxic concentrations. The global evaluation factor was not exceeded at any concentration. In addition, colony sizing showed no clastogenic effects in either experiment. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to mammalian cells under the conditions of the test (BSL Bioservice, 2012).
Triethoxy(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)silane has been tested in a reliable in vivo mouse micronucleus assay according to OECD Test Guideline 474 and in compliance with GLP. No statistically significant increase in the number of cells with micronuclei was observed after oral administration of the limit dose of 2000 mg/kg bw. Appropriate positive and vehicle controls were included and gave expected results. The PCE / NCE ratio was slightly affected in treated males, indicating that the test item was of low toxicity to the target tissue. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the induction in micronuclei under the conditions of the test (Bioservice, 2001).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available in vitro data and in vivo data on the registered substance and its structural analogue, triethoxy(2,4,4-trimethylpentyl)silane is not classified for mutagenicity according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.