Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 232-304-6 | CAS number: 8002-26-4 A complex combination of tall oil rosin and fatty acids derived from acidulation of crude tall oil soap and including that which is further refined. Contains at least 10% rosin.
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse mutation
assay / Ames test): negative with and without activation in all strains
tested (OECD TG 471)
Cytogenicity in mammalian cells: negative in
Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells (OECD TG 473)
Mutagenicity in mammalian cells: read across from analogous substance Crude Tall Oil: negative in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells (OECD TG 476)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2001-04-17 to 2009-12-13
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to OECD guideline and in compliance with GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver (S9 mix)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 17, 50 167, 500, 1667 and 5000 μg per plate.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle/solvent used: DMSO.
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-Aminoanthracene
- Remarks:
- TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 , TA 100 and E. coli with activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
- Remarks:
- E. coli without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA 1535 and TA 100 without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DSMO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 2-nitrofluorene
- Remarks:
- TA 98 without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- TA 1537 without activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: plate incorporation (Experiment 1) and preincubation (Experiment 2).
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min at 37 degC
- Exposure duration: 2 or 3 days
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 3 plated per concentration and strain in the mutagenicity test, and one replicate in the toxicity test.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: thinning of the background lawn of microcolonies and large size of resistant colonies.- Evaluation criteria:
- For S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and E.coli at least a doubling of the mean concurrent vehicle control values at some consideration of the test item. For S. typhimurium strain TA 100, a 1.5 fold increase over the control value was considered significant. If the mean colony count on the vehicle control plates was <10, then a value of 10 was assumed and minimum count of 20 was required before a significant mutagenic response was registered.
- Statistics:
- The number of revertant colonies was counted by hand.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity, but tested up to precipitating concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: A high level of precipitate was visible at 1667 and 5000 μg/plate in both the presence and absence of S9 mix.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: numbers of spontaneous revertants are comparable with the historic control data for the negative controls.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: No toxicity to bacteria was observed although the precipitation at 5000 μg/plate was too dense to assess the condition of background lawn accurately. See table 4 for details. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
The test substance did not produce an increase in the number of revertants in S. typhimurium (strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100) and E. coli WP2 uvr A when tested under GLP to OECD 471 (2000). The test material was therefore considered to be non-mutagenic under the conditions of this test. - Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2001-04-17 to 2001-12-17
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted in accordance with OECD guideline 473, and in compliance with GLP.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: basic medium (Ham's F-10) containing HEPES buffer, supplemented with antibiotic minocycline.
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes - Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver enzymes (S9 mix)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1 without S9 mix: 9 dose levels up to 5000 μg/ml.
Experiment 1 with S9 mix: 10, 20, 40, 60 and 80 μg/ml.
Experiment 2 without S9 mix: 50, 55, 60, 62.5, 65, 67.5 and 70 μg/ml.
Experiment 2 with S9 mix: 5, 10, 20, 30 , 40, 50 and 60 μg/ml.
The presence of S9 mix increased the cytotoxicity of the test substance and the test had to be repeated with more suitable concentrations. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: The test item was freely soluble in DMSO. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without S9 mix Migrated to IUCLID6: 10-40 mg/ml
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with S9 mix Migrated to IUCLID6: 20-50 μg/ml
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in suspension.
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20h, see Table 1.
- Exposure duration: 6h (Experiment 1); 22h (Experiment 2), see Table 2.
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): recovery period Experiment 1 = 6-22 h; recovery period Experiment 2 - 22-46 h, see Table 2.
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): Experiment 1 - 24 h; Experiment 2 - 48 h , see Table 2.
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: from 2 slides per culture, up to 50 metaphase cells per slide, a total of 100 metaphase cells per culture were examined.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: evidence of metaphase cells and signs of cellular necrosis.
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes.
- Determination of endoreplication: yes.
- Other: living cultures were examined for evidence of changes to cell morphology, once at the end of the treatment period and again before harvesting of cultures.
OTHER: anueploidy, multiple aberation, double minutes, uncondensed chromosome, reciprocal translocation, robertsonian translocation, pericentric inversion, pulverised chromosome, multiple aberration.- Evaluation criteria:
- A negative response was recorded if the results from the item treated cultures were within 95% confidence limits for the historical negative control data. The response at a single dose was classified as significant if the percent of aberrant cells is consistently greater than the 99% confidence limits for the historical data, or greater than double the frequency of an elevated vehicle or untreated control culture if appropriate.
A test was positive if the response in at least one acceptable dose level is significant by the criterion above. The test item was positive if both Experiment 1 and 2 were positive, as described above, or if the second test was positive after the first gave indications of activity. These indications may be suspicious levels of aberrant cells (95-99% confidence limits). - Statistics:
- The cells and aberrations were counted manually.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 60 μg/ml
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Weakly clastogenic results were recorded at 30μg/L in Experiment 2, however the concentration tested was deemed overtly toxic to the cells.
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no pH measurements were made because the culture medium did not change colour.
- Effects of osmolality: no
- Evaporation from medium:
- Water solubility: the test item was freely soluble in DMSO.
- Precipitation: slightly cloudy at 78 μg/ml, cloudy between 156 and 5000 μg/ml
- Other confounding effects: substance was highly cytotoxic with S9 mix.
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: A range finding study was conducted to examine the change in osmotic pressure and precipitation with addition of the test substance.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: in Experiment 1 all the cultures treated with Tall Oil had levels of structural aberrations within the 95% confidence limits of the historical negative control data. In Experiment 2 in the absence of S9 mix all culture conformed with historical data, in the presence of S9 mix
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: in Experiment 1 none of the concentrations assessed for aberrations were deemed toxic to the cells. In Experiment 2 cultures treated with 30 μg/ml had <50% reduced cell count. - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative
The test substance was tested in Chinese Hamster Ovary cells (CHO) under GLP to OECD 473 (2000) and was weakly clastogenic only at overtly toxic concentrations. It is the reviewer's opinion that the test material should be considered negative under the conditions of the test. - Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 01 April 2010 to 05 July 2010
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to the appropriate OECD test guideline, and in compliance with GLP.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbitol/beta-naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment 1: 5 to 70 μg/ml (-S9); 6.25 to 150 μg/ml (+S9)
Experiment 2: 10 to 160 μg/ml (-S9); 20 to 100 μg/ml (+S9) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: none given in draft report - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 400 μg/ml (expt. 1); 100 μg/ml (expt. 2)
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation Migrated to IUCLID6: 2 μg/ml
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METABOLIC ACTIVATION: final concentration S9: 2% experiment 1; 1% experiment 2. cofactors used: NADP; Glucose-6-phosphate
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: none
- Exposure duration: 4 h (experiment 1 + and - S9, experiment 2 +S9); 24 h (experiment 2 -S9)
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10-14 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): TFT
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate treatments, experiment repeated
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 2000 cells / well evaluated for mutant frequency
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Other: small and large colonies
OTHER: microtitre plates used - Evaluation criteria:
- A mutagenic response is a statistically significant increase in the induced mutant frequency (IMF) over the concurrent vehicle mutant frequency value, by an amount that is greater than the Global Evaluation Factor of 126 x 10E-06. The increase must be reproducible or part of a dose-related response.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 80 μg/ml (+ 1% S9)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: no marked change in pH was observed
- Effects of osmolality: osmolality did not increase by more than 50 mOsm
- Other confounding effects: none
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: results of range finding experiment showed a steep toxicity curve
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: control results were within the range of the historical data - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative with and without metabolic activation
Crude Tall Oil has been tested according to OECD 476 and under GLP. The test material did not induce any toxicologically significant dose-related increases in the mutant frequency at any dose level, either with or without metabolic activation, in either the first or the second experiment. The vehicle and positive controls produced expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for mutagenicity to mammalian cells under the conditions of the test.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 2a. Experiment 1 - Mutagenicity Assay. Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates).
Strain | TA 1535 | TA 1537 | TA 98 | ||||||
Conc. (μg/plate) | - MA | + MA | Cytotoxic (yes/no) | - MA | + MA | Cytotoxic (yes/no) | - MA | + MA | Cytotoxic (yes/no) |
0* | 10 | 11 | no | 5 | 7 | no | 11 | 17 | no |
17 | 8 | 14 | no | 2 | 9 | no | 9 | 20 | no |
50 | 9 | 11 | no | 4 | 10 | no | 12 | 16 | no |
167 | 10 | 10 | no | 5 | 10 | no | 15 | 18 | no |
500 | 10 | 9 | no | 7 | 5 | no | 7 | 17 | no |
1667 | 10 | 9 | no | 4 | 5 | no | 14 | 15 | no |
5000 | 7** | 11** | no | 3** | 4** | no | 6** | 11** | no |
Positive control | 325 | 378 | no | 2531 | 258 | no | 387 | 716 | no |
* = solvent control with DMSO
** = with precipitation, precipitation too dense to assess background lawn accurately - assumed to be normal.
Table 2b. Experiment 1 - Mutagenicity Assay. Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates).
Strain |
TA 100 |
WP2uvrA |
||||
Conc. (μg/plate) |
- MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic (yes/no) |
- MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic (yes/no) |
0* |
85 |
118 |
no |
8 |
11 |
no |
17 |
99 |
110 |
no |
11 |
10 |
no |
50 |
109 |
101 |
no |
8 |
10 |
no |
167 |
105 |
129 |
no |
9 |
6 |
no |
500 |
92 |
100 |
no |
6 |
9 |
no |
1667 |
91 |
100 |
no |
10 |
15 |
no |
5000 |
102** |
104** |
no |
6** |
5** |
no |
Positive control |
1025 |
1090 |
no |
355 |
643 |
no |
* = solvent control with DMSO
** = with precipitation, precipitation too dense to assess background lawn accurately - assumed to be normal.
Table 3a. Experiment 2 - Mutagenicity Assay. Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates).
Strain |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
||||||
Conc. (μg/plate) |
- MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic (yes/no) |
- MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic (yes/no) |
- MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic (yes/no) |
0* |
12 |
14 |
no |
12 |
10 |
no |
21 |
22 |
no |
17 |
14 |
20 |
no |
4 |
10 |
no |
14 |
23 |
no |
50 |
11 |
21 |
no |
4 |
7 |
no |
13 |
21 |
no |
167 |
14 |
16 |
no |
6 |
11 |
no |
19 |
22 |
no |
500 |
17 |
10 |
no |
9 |
11 |
no |
14 |
18 |
no |
1667 |
10 |
11 |
no |
7STLP |
9 P |
no |
15P |
15P |
no |
5000 |
14** |
16** |
no |
2TLP |
5** |
no |
14** |
17** |
no |
Positive control |
417 |
223 |
no |
219.1 |
252 |
no |
374 |
452 |
no |
* = solvent control with DMSO
** = with precipitation, precipitation too dense to assess background lawn accurately - assumed to be normal.
STLP - slightly thin lawn, with precipitation
TLP = thin lawn, precipitation
P = with precipitation
Table 3b. Experiment 2 - Mutagenicity Assay. Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates).
Strain |
TA 100 |
WP2uvrA |
||||
Conc. (μg/plate) |
- MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic (yes/no) |
- MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic (yes/no) |
0* |
102 |
123 |
no |
16 |
12 |
no |
17 |
99 |
117 |
no |
11 |
14 |
no |
50 |
107 |
136 |
no |
11 |
14 |
no |
167 |
101 |
128 |
no |
12 |
13 |
no |
500 |
110 |
101 |
no |
11 |
12 |
no |
1667 |
105 |
97P |
no |
9P |
11P |
no |
5000 |
99** |
108** |
no |
8** |
11** |
no |
Positive control |
1142 |
586 |
no |
355 |
874 |
no |
* = solvent control with DMSO
** = with precipitation, precipitation too dense to assess background lawn accurately - assumed to be normal.
P = with precipitation.
Table 4. Toxicity test results with strain TA 100.
Concentration (μg/plate) | Cell count - MA | Cell count + MA |
0* | 119 | 108 |
17 | 107 | 104 |
50 | 123 | 105 |
167 | 125 | 102 |
500 | 97 | 103 |
1667 | 126 |
108P |
5000 | 98** | 86** |
* = solvent control with DMSO
** = precipitation too dense to assess background lawn accurately - assumed to be normal.
P = precipitation
Table 3a. Result of chromosome analysis Experiment 1 with activation (per 200 cells scored from 2 replicates, except for positive control where 100 cells were scored from 1 plate), 6 h treatment, 24 h harvest.
Solvent Control (1%)* | Positive control 40 μg/ml | Positive Control 50 μg/ml | Low dose 10 μg/ml | Medium dose 20 μg/ml | High dose 40 μg/ml | ||
Cytotoxicity | N | N | N | N | N | N | |
Chromatid aberrations | gaps | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
deletions | 0 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
fragment | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
Chromosome | gaps | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
deletions | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
fragment | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Complex | exchange | 0 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Aberrant Cell Frequency | excluding gaps (%) | 0 | 1.5 | 6.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Aneuplody | (% of cells with) |
0 | 0 | 1.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Endoreplication | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5.5 | |
Polyploidy | 2 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0 | 0 |
Table 3b. Result of chromosome analysis Experiment 1 without activation (per 200 cells scored from 2 replicates, except for positive control where 100 cells were scored from 1 plate), 6 h treatment, 24 h harvest.
|
|
Solvent Control (1%)* |
Positive control 20 μg/ml |
Positive Control 30 μg/ml |
Low dose 20 μg/ml |
Medium dose 39 μg/ml |
High dose 78 μg/ml |
Cytotoxicity |
|
N |
N.R. |
N.R. |
N |
N |
N |
Chromatid aberrations |
gaps |
0 |
1 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
deletions |
0 |
0 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
fragment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Chromosome |
gaps |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
deletions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
fragment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Complex |
exchange |
0 |
1 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Aberrant Cell Frequency |
excluding gaps (%) |
0 |
0.5 |
6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Aneuplody |
(% of cells with) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.5 |
Endoreplication |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Polyploidy |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0 |
Table 3c. Result of chromosome analysis Experiment 2 with activation (per 200 cells scored from 2 replicates, except for positive control where 100 cells were scored from 1 plate), 6 h treatment, 24 h harvest.
|
|
Solvent Control (1%)* |
Positive control 20 μg/ml |
Positive Control 30 μg/ml |
Low dose 10 μg/ml |
Medium dose 20 μg/ml |
High dose 30 μg/ml |
Cytotoxicity |
|
N |
|
|
|
|
|
Chromatid aberrations |
gaps |
0 |
3 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
5 |
deletions |
0 |
11 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
|
fragment |
0 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
|
Chromosome |
gaps |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
deletions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
fragment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Complex |
exchange |
0 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
1 |
6 |
Aberrant Cell Frequency |
excluding gaps (%) |
0 |
5 |
10 |
0.5 |
1 |
5 |
Aneuplody |
(% of cells with) |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
1 |
Endoreplication |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
3.5 |
|
Polyploidy |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1.5 |
Table 3d. Result of chromosome analysis Experiment 2 without activation (per 200 cells scored from 2 replicates, except for positive control where 100 cells were scored from 1 plate), 22 h treatment, 24 h harvest.
|
|
Solvent Control (1%)* |
Positive control 20 μg/ml |
Positive Control 30 μg/ml |
Low dose 65 μg/ml |
Medium dose 67.5 μg/ml |
High dose 70 μg/ml |
Cytotoxicity |
|
N |
N.R. |
N.R. |
N |
N |
N |
Chromatid aberrations |
gaps |
0 |
1 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
deletions |
0 |
2 |
15 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
fragment |
0 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
Chromosome |
gaps |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
deletions |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
fragment |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Complex |
exchange |
0 |
2 |
11 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Aberrant Cell Frequency |
excluding gaps (%) |
0 |
2.5 |
11.5 |
0.5 |
0 |
0.5 |
Aneuplody |
(% of cells with) |
0.5 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
Endoreplication |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Polyploidy |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
* = in this test the solvent control is used as a control.
N.R. = not reported.
Table 1 Preliminary toxicity test
Dose (μg/ml) |
% RSG (-S9) 4-Hour Exposure |
% RSG (+S9) 4-Hour Exposure |
% RSG (-S9) 24-Hour Exposure |
0* |
100 |
100 |
100 |
19.53 |
103 |
97 |
107 |
39.06 |
83 |
93 |
96 |
78.13 |
0 |
42 |
38 |
156.25 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
312.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
625 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1250 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2500 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
5000 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
* Solvent control with DMSO
Table 2 Results of mutagenicity study, experiment 1 (mean of 2 treatments)
Concentration (μg/ml) |
4 hours -S9 |
Concentration (μg/ml) |
4 hours + S9 |
||||
% RSG |
RTG |
MF |
% RSG |
RTG |
MF |
||
0* |
100 |
1.00 |
89.47 |
0 |
100 |
1.00 |
91.08 |
5 |
103 |
not plated |
6.25 |
107 |
0.93 |
106.59 |
|
10 |
100 |
not plated |
12.5 |
113 |
1.03 |
88.73 |
|
20 |
103 |
1.04 |
84.23 |
25 |
110 |
0.97 |
120.32 |
30 |
108 |
1.00 |
79.90 |
50 |
111 |
0.84 |
109.32 |
40 |
105 |
1.08 |
87.43 |
75 |
78 |
0.63 |
119.76 |
50 |
105 |
0.98 |
77.52 |
100** |
2** |
<0.01 |
(278.35) |
60 |
81 |
0.82 |
100.51 |
125 |
0 |
- |
- |
70 |
69 |
0.72 |
82.68 |
150 |
0 |
- |
- |
Linear trend |
Not significant |
Linear trend |
Not significant |
||||
Positive control |
75 |
0.52 |
936.58 |
Positive control |
71 |
0.23 |
1294.25 |
* Solvent control with DMSO
** Treatment excluded from test statistics due to toxicity
RSG: Relative Suspension Growth
RTG: Relative Total Growth
MF: 5-TFT resistant mutants/10E06 viable cells 2 days after treatment
Table 3 Results of mutagenicity study, experiment 2 (mean of 2 treatments)
Concentration (μg/ml) |
24 hours -S9 |
Concentration (μg/ml) |
4 hours + S9 |
||||
% RSG |
RTG |
MF |
% RSG |
RTG |
MF |
||
0* |
100 |
1.00 |
93064 |
0 |
100 |
1.00 |
126.36 |
10 |
107 |
not plated |
20 |
98 |
not plated |
||
20 |
104 |
0.96 |
117.64 |
40 |
102 |
0.98 |
115.39 |
40 |
99 |
0.97 |
105.72 |
50 |
100 |
1.06 |
98.11 |
60 |
75 |
0.78 |
105.74 |
60 |
96 |
0.97 |
73.88 |
80 |
55 |
0.56 |
93.50 |
70 |
93 |
0.87 |
114.54 |
100 |
28 |
0.24 |
106.79 |
80 |
76 |
0.67 |
142.67 |
120** |
1 |
0.02 |
162.70 |
90 |
55 |
0.50 |
116.35 |
160 |
0 |
not plated |
100 |
2 |
not plated |
||
Linear trend |
Not significant |
Linear trend |
Not significant |
||||
Positive control |
75 |
|
|
Positive control |
74 |
0.52 |
730.73 |
* Solvent control with DMSO
** Treatment excluded from test statistics due to toxicity
RSG: Relative Suspension Growth
RTG: Relative Total Growth
MF: 5-TFT resistant mutants/10E06 viable cells 2 days after treatment
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Description of key information
No information is available from in vivo studies. In view of the lack of genotoxic effects seen in the in vitro studies, testing in vivo is not required.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Reliable studies are available for in vitro mutagenicity to bacteria and cytogenicity to mammalian cells. No studies are available on the mutagenicity of Distilled Tall Oil to mammalian cells, but information for this endpoint is available for the related substance Crude Tall Oil (CAS 8002 -26 -4).
Distilled Tall Oil is derived from Crude Tall Oil by distillation, and so contains only constituents that are also present in Crude Tall Oil (see section 1.4 for more detail on composition and read-across justification). The concentration of components varies between these products, but as no effects were seen in Crude Tall Oil it is justifiable to read-across the mammalian mutagenicity result to Distilled Tall Oil. None of the constituents of CTO and DTO is known to be genotoxic. Functional groups are considered to be of importance when evaluating genetic toxicology, as a number of reactive groups and molecular substructures are associated with mutagenic and carcinogenic properties of chemicals (Benigni and Bossa, 2006). None of the constituents of CTO and DTO contains functional groups that are linked to genotoxicity (Benigni et al 2008). The results of all the studies on Distilled Tall Oil and Crude Tall Oil are in agreement.
BACTERIAL MUTAGENICITY
Distilled Tall Oil (CAS No. 8002-26-4) was shown to be non-mutagenic in a GLP study, conducted according to OECD test guideline 471 (Stevenson, 2001). Mutagenic activity was tested using Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, and TA 100, and Escherichia coli WP2uvrA. The tests were conducted with and without metabolic activation (Araclor 1254-induced rat liver S9 mix). The test substance was diluted in dimethylsulfoxide, which was also used as the vehicle control. The dose levels used in toxicity testing were 17, 50, 167, 500, 1667 and 5000 µg per plate. Based on the results of toxicity testing, the same concentrations were used in the mutagenicity tests. Independent tests were conducted using these concentrations and bacteria, one using the direct plate method, and the other the pre-incubation method.
Each dose level and strain was tested in triplicate. Precipitation of the test substance was observed in both mutation assays at 5000 µg per plate. Toxicity was observed only in strain TA 1537 in the pre-incubation assay at 1667 and 5000 µg per plate. In the other strains, precipitation at 5000 µg obscured the condition of the background lawns. No mutagenicity was observed in any strain used in the presence or absence of metabolic activation.
MAMMALIAN MUTAGENICITY
The related substance Crude Tall Oil, from which Distilled Tall Oil is derived, has been tested for the induction of mutations in mammalian cells according to OECD test guideline 476 and under GLP. The result of this study is negative.
Distilled Tall Oil is derived from Crude Tall Oil by distillation, and so contains only constituents that are also present in Crude Tall Oil (see Section 1.4 for more detail on composition and read-across justification). The concentration of components varies between these products, but as no effects were seen in Crude Tall Oil it is justifiable to read-across the mammalian mutagenicity result to Distilled Tall Oil. None of the constituents of CTO and DTO is known to be genotoxic. Functional groups are considered to be of importance when evaluating genetic toxicology, as a number of reactive groups and molecular substructures are associated with mutagenic and carcinogenic properties of chemicals (Benigniand Bossa, 2006). None of the constituents of CTO and DTO contains functional groups that are linked to genotoxicity (Benigni et al 2008). The results of all the studies on Distilled Tall Oil and Crude Tall Oil are in agreement.
MAMMALIAN CYTOGENICITY
Distilled Tall Oil (CAS No 8002-26-4) was shown to be non-clastogenic in a GLP chromosomal aberration study in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, conducted according to OECD test guideline 473 (Murie, 2001) in the presence and absence of metabolic activation (Araclor 1254-induced rat liver S9 mix). The test substance was diluted in dimethylsulfoxide, which was also used as the vehicle control. Two independent tests were conducted, with and without metabolic activation. In the first test, the dose levels selected were 20 - 5000 µg/ml with and without S9. The test in the presence of S9 was repeated at 10 - 80 µg/ml due to toxicity. Toxicity was observed at 156 µg/ml and above without S9 and at 60 µg/ml and above with S9. In the second test, the dose levels selected were 50 - 70 µg/ml without S9 and 5 - 60 µg/ml with S9. Toxicity was observed at
70 µg/ml and above without S9 and at 30 µg/ml and above with S9. The test conditions and results are summarised in Table 5.10.
Table5.10: Conditions and results of in vitro cytogenicity test on Tall Oil
|
Test 1 |
Test 2 |
||
|
With metabolic activaton |
Without metabolic activation |
With metabolic activaton |
Without metabolic activation |
Dose |
20 to 5000 µg/ml, repeated at 10 to 80 µg/ml |
20 to 5000 µg/ml |
5 to 60 µg/ml |
50 to 70 µg/ml |
Toxicity observed at |
60 µg/ml and above |
156 µg/ml and above |
30 µg/ml and above |
70 µg/ml and above |
Result |
negative |
negative |
positive at 30 µg/ml |
negative |
Clastogenicity was reported in Test 2 in the presence of S9 at 30 µg/ml. This concentration was judged to be overtly toxic to cells, so this result is regarded as an artefact.
Justification for classification or non-classification
The available information for the substance indicates that when tested in vitro, Distilled Tall Oil does not induce mutations in bacterial cells or chromosome aberrations in mammalian cells. The related substance, Crude Tall Oil (CAS 8002 -26 -4), did not induce mutation in mammalian cells. There is no justification from the in vitro results for testing in vivo. Therefore it is considered that classification for mutagenicity is not required.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.