Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 200-843-6 | CAS number: 75-15-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP, guideline study; four bacterial strains used instead of five
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1983
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- only 4 bacterial strains tested
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OTS 798.5265 (The Salmonella typhimurium Bacterial Reverse Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1985, amended 1987
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 mix- rat liver, Aroclor 1254 administered
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.005%, 0.01%, 0.025%, 0.05%, 0.1% v/v
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: none
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- no
- Remarks:
- no solvent/vehicle used
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: in the abscence and presence of metabolic activation: 2-aminoanthracene (TA1535), benzo[alpha]pyrene (TA1537, TA100, TA98); in the abscence of metabolic activation: sodium azide (TA1535, TA100), 9-aminoacridine (TA1537), 2-nitrofluorene (TA98);
- Remarks:
- dichloromethane in vapour phase (7.5% v/v) was included in each test without metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:3/ treatment
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: abscence or thinning of the background lawn of non-revertant colonies
EXPOSURE TO CS2:
Sets of solidified plates were placed, with lids removed, in stainless steel racks, designed to keep the plates separate and permit atmospheric circulation, inside stainless steel vessels. These vessels were then sealed and partially evacuated. Calculated volumes of carbon disulphide liquid were injected into the vessels via a septum and allowed to vaporize, producing atmospheres containing carbon disulphide at the nominal concentrations
mentioned above.Sterile air was admitted to the vessels in order to equilibrate the contents to atmospheric pressure, and the vessels with their contents were incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. After removal from the vessels, the plates were incubated for a further day in order to permit revertant
colonies to grow to a size large enough to be scored. - Evaluation criteria:
- number of revertants/plate
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: yes, only at the highest concentration
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- No mutagenic activity of CS2 detected in the Ames test
- Executive summary:
Carbon disulphide was examined for its mutagenic activity in four histidine-dependent auxotrophs ofSalmonella typhimurium, strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537. Agar plates, seeded with the tester strains, were exposed to the test material in vapour phase, in the abscence and presence of metabolic activation, in the following nominal concentrations: 0.005%, 0.01%, 0.025%, 0.05% and 0.1% v/v (nominal). These concentrations were selected following preliminary toxicity tests in strain TA 98. Carbon disulphide did not exhibit any mutagenic activity under the conditions of this test. No increases in revertants were obtained in any of the four tester strains following exposure to carbon disulphide at the concentrations tested. Inhibition of bacterial growth, observed as thinning of the background lawn of non-revertant cells and reduction in revertant colony numbers, occurred in all strains with carbon disulphide at a nominal concentration of 0.1%v/v. The positive and negative controls were valid.
The study was performed according to the OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals No. 471 (1983) and US EPA (TSCA) Guideline § 798.5265 (1985, amended 1987).
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2010-06-09 until 2010-08-02
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- first experiment: 4 hours treatment with and without metabolic activation
second experiment: 24 hours treatment without metabolic activation, 4 hours treatment with metaoblic activation - GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Thymidine Kinase Locus
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- - Type and identity of media: RPMI
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: Clone 3.7.2C
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital/Beta-Naphtoflavone induced Rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- Experiment I:
without S9 mix: 23.8, 47,6, 95,1, 190,3, 380,5, 761 µg/mL
with S9 mix: 23.8, 47,6, 95,1, 190,3, 380,5, 761 µg/mL
Experiment II:
without S9 mix: 23.8, 47,6, 95,1, 190,3, 380,5, 761 µg/mL
with S9 mix: 23.8, 47,6, 95,1, 190,3, 380,5, 761 µg/mL
Following the expression phase of 48 hours the cultures at 23.8 µg/mL
(printed in bold letters) were not continued since a minimum of only four
concentrations is required by the guidelines. - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Ethanol
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: solubility properties - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- methylmethanesulfonate
- Remarks:
- without metabolic activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with metabolic activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 hours with and without metabolic activation in experiment 1, 24 hours without metaoblic activation in experiment and 4 hours with metabolic activation in experiment 2
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 hours
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10 to 15 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): RPMI 1640 medium by addition of 5 µg/mL TFT
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 2
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: >1,5 x 10 exp. 6 cells
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth
- Evaluation criteria:
- A test item is classified as mutagenic if the induced mutation frequency reproducibly exceeds a threshold of 126 colonies per 10 exp. 6 cells above the corresponding solvent control or negative control, respectively.
A relevant increase of the mutation frequency should be dose-dependent.
A mutagenic response is considered to be reproducible if it occurs in both parallel cultures.
However, in the evaluation of the test results the historical variability of the mutation rates in negative
and/or vehicle con¬trols and the mutation rates of all negative and/or vehicle controls of this study are taken into consideration.
Results of test groups are generally rejected if the relative total growth, and the cloning efficiency 1 is less than 10 % of the vehicle control
unless the exception criteria specified by the IWGT recommendations are fulfilled.
Whenever a test item is considered mutagenic according to the above mentioned criteria, the ratio of small versus large colonies is used
to differentiate point mutations from clastogenic effects. If the increase of the mutation frequency is accompanied by a reproducible and
dose dependent shift in the ratio of small versus large colonies clastogenic effects are indicated. - Statistics:
- Linear regression analysis (least squares) using SYSTAT 11 (SYSTAT Software, Inc., 501, Canal Boulevard, Suite C, Richmond, CA 94804, USA)
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: not effected
- Effects of osmolality: not increased
- Evaporation from medium: not examined
- Water solubility: --
- Precipitation: not observed
- Other confounding effects: none
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
According to the results of the pre-test at least four adequate concentrations were chosen for the mutation experiment.
The highest concentration should be 10 mM, but not higher than 5 mg/mL, unless limited by the solubility or toxicity of the test item.
RSG (Relative Suspension Growth) or RTG (Relative Total Growth) values (main experiment) below 50 % are considered toxic. In case of toxic effects, the highest test item concentration of the main experiment should reduce the RSG or RTG value to approximately 10 - 20 %.
The pre-experiment was performed in the presence (4 h treatment) and absence (4 h and 24 h treatment) of metabolic activation. Test item concentrations between 6.0 µg/mL and 761 µg/mL were used. The highest concentration (equal to approximately 10 mM) in the pre-experiment was chosen with regard to the molecular weight (76.1 g/mol) of the test item. Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative suspension growth below 50% occurred at 380.5 µg/mL following 4 hour treatment with and without metabolic activation. Following 24 hour treatment without metabolic activation cytotoxicity was noted at 190.3 µg/mL and above.
The test medium was checked for precipitation at the end of each treatment period (4 or 24 hours) before the test item was removed. No precipitation was observed by the unaided eye up to the maximum concentration. Therefore, the maximum concentration in experiments I and II was set to 761 µg/mL equal to approximately 10 mM as well. The lower concentrations were spaced by a factor of 2.
Both, pH value and osmolarity were determined in the pre-experiment at the maximum concentration of the test item and in the solvent control without metabolic activation. No relevant change in the osmolarity or pH value was observed (solvent control: 411 mOsm, pH 7.46 versus 441 mOsm and pH 7.47 at 761 µg/mL). The osmolarity was considerably above the physiological value of approximately 300 mOsm but that was based on ethanol used as solvent. The osmolarity is determined by freeze-point depression and ethanol interferes with this technique. Therefore, relative rather than absolute values should be considered.
To overcome problems with possible deviations in toxicity both main experiments were started with more than four concentrations.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: complies
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:
Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative total growth of less than 50 % of survival in both parallel cultures were observed at 761 µg/mL in the first experiment with metabolic activation and in the second experiment without metabolic activation. - Conclusions:
- In conclusion it can be stated that under the experimental conditions reported the test item did not induce mutations in the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus assay using the cell line L5178Y in the absence and presence of metabolic activation.
- Executive summary:
The study was performed to investigate the potential of Carbon disulfide to induce mutations at the mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase locus using the cell line L5178Y.
This study was conducted according to the procedures indicated by the following internationally accepted guidelines and recommendations:
Ninth Addendum to the OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, February 1998,
adopted July 21, 1997, Guideline No. 476 "In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test“Commission Regulation (EC) No. 440/2008 B.17: ”Mutagenicity – In vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test“, dated May 30, 2008.
The assay was performed in two independent experiments, using two parallel cultures each. The first main experiment was performed with and without liver microsomal activation and a treatment period of 4 h. The second experiment was performed with a treatment period of 24 hours in the absence of metabolic activation and 4 hours in the presence of metabolic activation.
The main experiments were evaluated at the following concentrations:
Experiment I and II:
without S9 mix: 47.6; 95.1; 190.3; 380.5; 761.0 µg/mL
with S9 mix: 47.6; 95.1; 190.3; 380.5; 761.0 µg/mLThe test medium was checked for precipitation visible to the naked eye at the end of the 4 hours treatment just before the test item was removed. No precipitation meeting the criteria mentioned above was noted in the pre-experiment and in both main experiments.
Relevant cytotoxic effects indicated by a relative total growth of less than 50 % of survival in both parallel cultures were observed at 761 µg/mL in the first experiment with metabolic activation and in the second experiment without metabolic activation.
No substantial and reproducible dose dependent increase of the mutation frequency was observed in both main experiments up to the maximum concentration with and without metabolic activation. The threshold of 126 above the corresponding solvent control was not reached or exceeded.
A linear regression analysis (least squares) was performed to assess a possible dose dependent increase of mutant frequencies using SYSTATâ11 statistics software. No significant dose dependent trend of the mutation frequency indicated by a probability value of <0.05 was determined in any of the experimental groups.
In this study the range of the solvent controls was from 64 up to 240 mutant colonies per 106cells; the range of the groups treated with the test item was from 51 up to 296 mutant colonies per 106cells.The highest solvent control value (240 colonies per 106cells) exceeded the recommended
50 – 170 x 106control range as stated in the acceptability criteria of this report.The corresponding control value of the parallel culture however, was fully acceptable. Even the solvent controls of both cultures of the first experiment with metabolic activation slightly exceeded the threshold of 170 per 106cells (197 and 200).The data are acceptable however, since the range of 50-200 colonies per 106cells recommended by the IWGT in 2003 was covered. The cloning efficiency of the solvent control of the second culture of the first experiment and of the first culture of the second experiment without metabolic activation exceeded the upper limit of 120%. The data are acceptable however, since the parallel culture remained within the recommended range and the absolute values of the cloning efficiency were used to calculate the mutation frequency. The total suspension growth exceeded the upper limit of 32 in the first culture of the first experiment with metabolic activation.The data are acceptable since again, the parallel culture remained within the acceptable range and the absolute value of the total suspension growth was used to calculate the relative total growth.MMS (19.5 µg/mL in experiment I and 13.0 µg/mL in experiment II) and CPA (3.0 and 4.5 µg/mL) were used as positive controls and showed a distinct increase in induced total mutant colonies and an increase of the relative quantity of small versus large induced colonies with at least one of the concentrations used.
Referenceopen allclose all
Summary Table
relative | mutant | relative | mutant | |||||
conc. µg | S9 | total | colonies/ | total | colonies/ | |||
per mL | mix | growth | 106cells | threshold | growth | 106cells | threshold | |
Column | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
Experiment I / 4 h treatment | culture I | culture II | ||||||
Solv. control with ethanol | - | 100.0 | 240 | 366 | 100.0 | 132 | 258 | |
Pos. control with MMS | 19.5 | - | 28.1 | 596 | 366 | 22.8 | 428 | 258 |
Test item | 23.8 | - | culture was not continued# | culture was not continued# | ||||
Test item | 47.6 | - | 117.9 | 229 | 366 | 86.8 | 107 | 258 |
Test item | 95.1 | - | 101.3 | 296 | 366 | 62.9 | 151 | 258 |
Test item | 190.3 | - | 117.3 | 221 | 366 | 57.2 | 178 | 258 |
Test item | 380.5 | - | 100.7 | 197 | 366 | 54.3 | 174 | 258 |
Test item | 761.0 | - | 84.8 | 172 | 366 | 50.0 | 144 | 258 |
Solv. control with ethanol | + | 100.0 | 197 | 323 | 100.0 | 200 | 326 | |
Pos. control with CPA | 3.0 | + | 30.5 | 396 | 323 | 94.2 | 291 | 326 |
Pos. control with CPA | 4.5 | + | 43.1 | 264 | 323 | 44.4 | 414 | 326 |
Test item | 23.8 | + | culture was not continued# | culture was not continued# | ||||
Test item | 47.6 | + | 75.9 | 170 | 323 | 101.0 | 272 | 326 |
Test item | 95.1 | + | 103.3 | 116 | 323 | 90.4 | 212 | 326 |
Test item | 190.3 | + | 60.9 | 173 | 323 | 142.5 | 161 | 326 |
Test item | 380.5 | + | 58.2 | 182 | 323 | 135.7 | 154 | 326 |
Test item | 761.0 | + | 31.6 | 182 | 323 | 44.8 | 173 | 326 |
Experiment II / 24 h treatment | culture I | culture II | ||||||
Solv. control with ethanol | - | 100.0 | 74 | 200 | 100.0 | 92 | 218 | |
Pos. control with MMS | 13.0 | - | 33.1 | 454 | 200 | 42.5 | 702 | 218 |
Test item | 23.8 | - | culture was not continued# | culture was not continued# | ||||
Test item | 47.6 | - | 63.4 | 78 | 200 | 102.7 | 80 | 218 |
Test item | 95.1 | - | 71.2 | 76 | 200 | 111.8 | 59 | 218 |
Test item | 190.3 | - | 64.7 | 85 | 200 | 98.7 | 98 | 218 |
Test item | 380.5 | - | 49.2 | 58 | 200 | 51.6 | 108 | 218 |
Test item | 761.0 | - | 19.4 | 86 | 200 | 26.2 | 79 | 218 |
Experiment II / 4 h treatment | culture I | culture II | ||||||
Solv. control with ethanol | + | 100.0 | 84 | 210 | 100.0 | 64 | 190 | |
Pos. control with CPA | 3.0 | + | 51.7 | 433 | 210 | 40.1 | 303 | 190 |
Pos. control with CPA | 4.5 | + | 31.1 | 423 | 210 | 26.6 | 544 | 190 |
Test item | 23.8 | + | culture was not continued# | culture was not continued# | ||||
Test item | 47.6 | + | 116.2 | 90 | 210 | 122.0 | 51 | 190 |
Test item | 95.1 | + | 101.1 | 72 | 210 | 69.3 | 58 | 190 |
Test item | 190.3 | + | 118.1 | 97 | 210 | 71.4 | 86 | 190 |
Test item | 380.5 | + | 84.4 | 75 | 210 | 55.5 | 71 | 190 |
Test item | 761.0 | + | 57.6 | 100 | 210 | 46.5 | 86 | 190 |
threshold = number of mutant colonies per 106cells of each solvent control plus 126
# culture was not continued since a minimum of four concentrations is required by the guidelines
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CD-1
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Breeding Laboratories (UK)
- Age at study initiation: 4-5 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 16.1-26 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes
- Housing: high density polypropylene cages with stainless steel taps
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: supplied via a polythene bottle and sipper tube
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 21±2
- Humidity (%): 55 ±15 %
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12 - Route of administration:
- inhalation: vapour
- Vehicle:
- no vehicle used
- Details on exposure:
- TYPE OF INHALATION EXPOSURE: snout only
GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE
Test atmospheres were generated using controlled fluid feed from a gasthight syringe driven by a syringe pump to an all glas evaporator generator maintained at ca. 50 deg. C. Dry oil-free comprssed air was passed through the vapour generator at a flow rate of ca. 5 L/min. Further dilution of the concentrated test substance vapour to provide a total flow of ca. 28 L/min was perfomed immediately before delivery of vapour to each chamber. The atmospheres were removed at a constant rate of 30 L/min and exhaust air vented to atmosphere after first passing through charcoal filters.
TEST ATMOSPHERE CONTROL
The concentrations was determined prior to exposure of the animals and then once each h during exposure. Atmosphere samples were taken using a gas sampling loop and the concentrations were determined using a GC fitted with a flame photometric detector.
EXPOSURE OF THE ANIMALS
Animals were exposed to the test material by snout-only inhalation. Prior to exposure of animals, the test material atmospheres were generated for each exposure chamber and samples analysed. Each mouse was placed in an individual polymethyl methacrylate restraining tube so that only the snout protruded. Each restraining tube was marked with the animal and group numbers. The restraining tubes were attached to the appropriate chamber so that the snout of each mouse projected into the lumen of the chamber. When the pre-exposure observations were complete, the syringe pump was switched on and the exposure timed for six hours following a 4.5 minute equilibration period, the theoretical time required for the concentration of vapour to reach 90% of its final value under the conditions of exposure employed (Silver and Arsenal, 1946). After six hours, the test atmosphere supply was switched off and the mice removed from the restraining tubes for examination. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 6 h
- Frequency of treatment:
- once
- Post exposure period:
- 24 or 48 h
- Remarks:
- Target Concentrations:
467, 1558, 4675 mg/m3 (150, 500, 1500 ppm) - Remarks:
- Analytical concentrations
157.4 +/- 8.7 ppm, 502.3 +/- 67.5 ppm, 1557.5 +/- 71.8 ppm - No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 (5 for positive control)
- Control animals:
- yes, sham-exposed
- Positive control(s):
- chlorambucil
- Route of administration: oral gavage
- Doses / concentrations: 30 mg/kg - Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow erythrocytes
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: based on the preliminary toxicity testing
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES ( in addition to information in specific fields): samples were taken 24 and 48 h after treatment
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: Animals were killed by cervical dislocation following carbon dioxide inhalation. Femurs from each animal were rapidly dissected out and cleaned of adherent tissue. The epiphyses were cut off to obtain access to the marrow canal. Marrow cells were flushed out with 2.5 ml foetal calf serum using a syringe and needle. The recovered cells were centrifuged at 1000 rpm for five minutes. The bulk of the supernatant fluid was discarded and the cell pellet resuspended in the remaining fluid. Single drops of the cell suspension were transferred to clean, dry slides, two or three smears (for the preliminary toxicity test or main micronucleus test respectively) prepared, and the slides left to air-dry. Following fixation in methanol for ten minutes, they were stained manually in 5% Giemsa stain (in Sorensen's buffer: pH 6.8), washed in buffer, air-dried, cleared for five minutes in xylene and made permanent using DPX mountant.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: The slides were examined under the light microscope. At high magnification (x 1000, oil immersion) a total of at least 2000 erythrocytes per animal were examined. Each erythrocyte scored was classed as polychromatic or mature. Each erythrocyte scored was also examined for the presence or absence of micronuclei. Thereafter, the frequencies of micronucleated cells per 1000 erythrocytes were calculated. The ratio of polychromatic to mature cells was also determined (indicating the rythm of cell division). The frequency of micronuclei in polychromatic cells provides an index of induced genetic damage. - Evaluation criteria:
- Positive for clastogenicity was a statistically and biologically significant increase in micronucleated polychromatic cells, compared to vehicle control, in at least one treatment group; particularly if supported by evidence of a dose-related response.
- Statistics:
- Mann-Whitney U procedure (Mann and Whitney, 1942), two-tailed test, one-tailed test.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 45, 150, 450 and 1500 ppm
All animals exposed to carbon disulphide at 1500 ppm were unconscious at the end of the exposure period, but regained consciousness the following day.
RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): no
Mean values of treated groups and control groups, in the incidence of polychromatic micronucleated cells was not significant, at both termination times (Table 2, attachment). Similarly, no significant differences were seen, among the two sexes, in the frequences of micronucleated polychromatic cells (Table 3, attachment). - Conclusions:
- No evidence of induced chromosomal or other damage leading to the formation of micronuclei in erythrocytes of the bone marrow was detected after exposure of the animals to CS2 via inhalation.
- Executive summary:
The effect of carbon disulphide on chromosome structure in the bone marrow erythrocytes of mice was examined. The animals (males and females) were exposed via inhalation snout-only, for 6 h to the following concentrations: 0, 467, 1558, 4675 mg/m3 (0, 150, 500, 1500 ppm). The exposure concentrations were based on a preliminary toxicity test. Chlorambucil (30 mg/kg bw) was used as a positive control, adminstered via the oral route. Animals were sacrifised and examined 24 and 48 h after exposure. No evidence of induced chromosomal or other damage leading to the formation of micronuclei in erythrocytes of the bone marrow was detected, uder the present test condition, after exposure of the animals to CS2 via inhalation. Mice exposed at 1500 ppm, however, showed a small increase in the ratio of polychromatic/mature cells, which may indicate disturbance of erythropoiesis.
Carbon disulphide was tested for induction of micronuclei in the bone marrow ertythrocytes of mice according to the OECD Guidelines 474 (1983).
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
CS2 has been tested for its genotoxicity in a series of in-vitro tests and in-vivo tests. The main results are summarized in the table below.
Type of test and quality |
Result |
In vitro |
|
Gene mutations in bacteria (GLP study); adequate |
Negative |
Gene mutations in mammalian tissue-culture cells (GLP study); adequate |
Negative |
Cytogenetic effects in primary human lymphocytes; adequate |
Weak and doubtful effects (gaps) for chromosomal aberrations – judged as negative Small but significant and dose dependent increase of sister chromatid exchanges - positive |
Unscheduled DNA synthesis in tissue-culture cells; low purity (86%) of the test compound |
Inconclusive; it cannot be excluded that the weak, doubtful positive response is caused by impurities |
Cytogenetic effects in human sperm; absence of data on purity |
Positive; it cannot be excluded that the positive response is caused by impurities |
In vivo |
|
Cytogenetic effects in rat bone marrow (inhalation); low purity (86%) of the test compound |
Negative |
Micronuclei in mouse bone-marrow erythrocytes (inhalation; GLP study); adequate |
Negative |
Host-mediated assay with mice (host) and Salmonella typhimurium TA98 (indicator) (inhalation); doubtful adequacy due to lack of positive control, low purity of test compound (86%) and low survival at the highest concentration in the males |
Negative |
Drosophila melanogaster sex-linked recessive lethal assay (vapour-phase exposure); low purity (86%) of the test compound |
Inconclusive; it cannot be excluded that the weak, doubtful positive response is caused by impurities |
Sperm-head abnormality test with rats and mice (inhalation); doubtful adequacy because of the low purity (86%) of the test compound and the weak response obtained with the positive control |
Negative |
Dominant-lethal test with rats (inhalation); low purity (86%) of the test compound |
Negative |
Chromosomal aberrations in female rats and their fetuses after treatment during preganancy (inhalation); quote from the Priority Substance List Assessment Report of Health Canada and Environment Canada.Carbon disulfide induced chromosomal aberrations and polyploid cells in the bone marrow of female rats and in rat embryos exposed on days 10–13 of gestation. It is difficult to assess the validity of these findings, as the reporting was brief (e.g., the statistical significance was often not indicated) and the effective dose was not reported, except to indicate that it was one-tenth of the LD50. |
Positive; doubt as regards the validity due to lack of information. |
Chromosomal aberrations in the oocytes and pronuclei zygotes (inhalation) | Positive; doubtful as regards the validity due to lack of information; only published in the form of a meeting abstract |
Sperm-head abnormality test with rats |
Positive; doubts as regards the validity due to lack of sufficient experimental details |
CS2 was found to be negative in fully adequate standard GLP in vitro tests for gene mutations with bacteria and mammalian tissue culture cells.
However, an in vitro test for chromosomal aberration test with primary human lymphocytes suggested a weak positive effect based on gaps, while in the same cells a significant and dose-dependent increase of sister chromatid exchanges was found. A weak positive effect was also found in a non-standard unscheduled DNA systhesis test in an established human cell line. The latter test was not fully adequate, because the carbon disulfide tested has a low purity, which points to the possibility that the effect was caused by an impurity. The positive effects obtained in these tests depended on the presence of metabolic activation with S9 fractions. An in vitro test with human sperm cells yielded a positive result; however, there is no information about the purity of the test compound.
The in-vivo data show a negative and fully adequate GLP test for micronuclei in mouse bone marrow and negative tests for dominant-lethals with rats, sperm-head abnormalities with rats and mice, chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow with rats and a host-mediated assay with mice as hosts and Salmonella typhimurium TA98 as indicator. Three in vivo studies showed positive results. The study by Vasil’eva (1982) used as endpoint the induction of chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow of female rats (dams) and their fetuses after inhalation of carbon sulfide. It is hard to judge the validity of this study, and in the reviews by internationally recognized bodies it is regarded doubtful. The same holds for the study of Bao et al. (1996), in which chromosomal aberrations were observed in oocytes and prenuclei zygotes of exposed adult female mice. The sperm head abnormality test of Kumar et al., (1999)
suggests genotoxic potential of CS2 but only sperm shape was evaluated. Nonetheless, the method is not validated, and the publication does not give sufficient experimental details.
In conclusion, with regard to the database on the genotoxicity of carbon disulfide, although in three studies a positive result was found, it can be concluded that there are clear doubts regarding their validity due to a lack of information on essential methodological details and or the fact they follow a design that has not been validated. In contrast there are 3 GLP studie reports (Ames test, MLA, and an in vivo MN test) showing clear negative results.
Justification for classification or non-classification
In conclusion, 3 GLP study reports for standard toxicity testing (Ames test - OECD 471, MLA - OECD 476, and an in vivo MN test - OECD 474) show clear negative results, as such no classification is needed for genotoxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.