Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

No evidence for genetic toxicity was found in the in vitro bacterial reverse mutation assay and mammalian cell reverese mutation assay reported in the dossier.


 


Mutagenicity of Benzotriazole is discussed in scientifc literature. A survey by Zeiger et al, (1987) is used often as reference, as this survey was used by Kirkland in various publications on test performance asssessment. However the available documentation is limited and not sufficent for a thorough evaluation.


A Publication by Zwart et al. (2020) reports a downscaled luminescent Ames assay with the Strains TA98lux and TA100lux. The authors are testing fractions of environmental samples, one fraction is claimed to contain Benzotriazole (analytically determined) and showing mutagenic properties. However, it is not clear whether other components, not detected and contained in the sample contribute to the observations. Furthermore, the available Ames test reported in the dossier (Andres, 2012) investigates the strains TA98 and TA100 and no mutagenic effect with the tested substance is observed.


 


 

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP Guidance study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
his-
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium, other: TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
first experiment
50/150/500/1501/5003 µg/plate
second experiment
313/625/1250/2500/5000 µg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO)

DMSO is chosen because 1H-benzotriazole is completly soluble and the vehicle does not have any effects on the viability of the bacetria.
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
benzo(a)pyrene
other: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylenediamine; 2-Amino-anthracene
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation) with and without preincubation

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: 4
Evaluation criteria:
The colonies were counted visually.
The increase factor f(I) of revertant induction and the absolute number ov refertants were calculated.
If a significant, reproducible increase of revertant colonies (f(I) > 2) can be observed, 1H-benzotriazole is considered mutagenic.
Statistics:
mean values and standard deviations of each treatment, solvent control and positive control are calculated. Calculations were performed with unrounded values
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 97a
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA:
The negative, vehicle and positive controls were compared to historical data and
found to be in the range of this data.
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Table: Mean revertants first experiment

 Strain        TA97a TA98         TA100 TA102 TA1535
 Induction  -S9  +S9 -S9   +S9  -S9  +S9  -S9  +S9  -S9 +S9 
 H2O Mean   118 121  15  19  90  101  145  144  16  17 
   sd  8 20 
 DMSO Mean   126 121  19  20  97  94  127  140  17  15 
   sd  9 12  14 
 Positive controls  Mean 563  562  236  220  452  470  583  631  193  186 
   sd  69 37  34  12  41  26  102  66  13  14 
   f(I)  4.47 4.64  12.42  11.00  5.02  5.00  4.59  4.51  12.06  12.40 
 5003 µg/pl.  Mean  107 125  18  15  99  102  149  141   16 14 
   sd  5 18  10 
   f(I)  0.85 1.03  0.95  0.75  1.02  1.09  1.17  1.01  0.94  0.93 
 1501 µg/pl.  Mean  123 124  17  16  103  103  143  146  17  17 
   sd  10 11 
   f(I)  0.98 1.02  0.89  0.80  1.06  1.10  1.13  1.04  1.00  1.13 
 500 µg/pl.  Mean  120 118  15  16  89  110  139  130  15  14 
   sd  5 10  16  11 
   f(I)  0.95 0.98  0.79  0.80  0.92  1.17  1.09  0.93  0.88  0.93 
 150 µg/pl.  Mean  116 121  14  18  88  101  136  141  15  15 
   sd  3 21  10  11 
   f(I)  0.92 1.00  0.74  0.90  0.91  1.07  1.07  1.01  0.88  1.00 
 50 µg/pl.  Mean  119 108  16  20  83  97  137  128  15  15 
   sd  5 19  15 
   f(I)  0.94 0.89  0.84  1.00  0.86  1.03  1.08  0.91  0.88  1.00 

Table: Mean revertants second experiment

 Strain        TA97a TA98         TA100 TA102 TA1535
 Induction  -S9  +S9 -S9   +S9  -S9  +S9  -S9  +S9  -S9 +S9 
 H2O Mean   118 117  15  15  100  87  166  153  16  15 
   sd  4 10  14  11 
 DMSO Mean   117 115  18  16  98  96  149  154  18  16 
   sd  3 23 
 Positive controls  Mean  517 592  217  222  416  473  621  611  210  241 
   sd  71 13  12  15  38  26  25  43  10  13 
   f(I)  4.42 5.15  12.06  13.88  4.16  4.93 4.17 3.97  13.13 15.06 
 5002 µg/pl.  Mean 104  112  15  14  95  93  139  146  15  14 
   sd  7 12 
   f(I)  0.89 0.97  0.83  0.88  0.97  0.97  0.93  0.95  0.83  0.88 
 2501 µg/pl.  Mean 112  113  14  15  84  79  145  157  15  13 
   sd  3 16 
   f(I)  0.96 0.98  0.78  0.94  0.86  0.82  0.97  1.02  0.83  0.81 
 1251 µg/pl.  Mean 117  109  14  16  82  79  143  150  17  16 
   sd  4 11  16 
   f(I)  1.00 0.95  0.78  1.00  0.84  0.82  0.96  0.97  0.94  1.00 
 626 µg/pl.  Mean 116  116  15  17  92  87  156  157  15  15 
   sd  4 16  14  12 
   f(I)  0.99 1.01  0.83  1.06  0.94  0.91  1.05  1.02  0.83  0.94 
 313 µg/pl.  Mean 115  114  14  17  85  85  146  151  16  14 
   sd  2 11 
   f(I)  0.98 0.99  0.78  1.06  0.87  0.89  0.98  0.98  0.89  0.88 
Conclusions:
1H-benzotriazole did not show mutagenic effects in the two conducted experiments.
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: OECD Guidance study with minor deviations
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
test article treatment is 4 hours instead of 5; whole fetal bovine serum is used instead of dialyzed calf serum
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
mammalian cell gene mutation assay
Target gene:
HGPRT (Hypoxanthine guanine phophoribosyl transferase
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Clone: CHO-K1BH4
- Type and identity of media: Ham's Nutrient Mixture F10 supplemented with L-glutamine, penicillin G, strptomycin sulfate, fungizone fetal bovine serum
- Periodically checked for Mycoplasma contamination: yes
- Periodically checked for karyotype stability: yes
- Periodically "cleansed" against high spontaneous background: yes
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9 rat liver homogenate
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
50 to 1000 µg/ml see tables
Vehicle / solvent:
DMSO
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
3-methylcholanthrene
other: 5-Bromo-2'-deoxyuridine
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium;

DURATION
- Exposure duration: 4 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 6 to 7 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10 days

SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 6-thioguanine
STAIN: Giemsa

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:

NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED:

Evaluation criteria:
Relative survival
Relative Population Growth
Absolute cloning efficiency
Mutant Frequency
Statistics:
mean values and standard deviation; significance calculated
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster Ovary (CHO)
Metabolic activation:
with
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES:
concentrations ranging from 2 to 1000µg/ml were tested for cytotoxic effects.
Without activation, only in the highest concentration a decrease in the relative survival to 80 % was obtained.
With activation, a concentration of 125 µg/ml lead to a survival of 70 % and at the highest concentration the rate was 0%.

MUTAGENICITY STUDY:
Non activation
Three trials were performed under nonactivation conditions, but the first trial was not used for evaluation, because the cloning efficiency of the vehicle controls was too low. In the second trial the assayed cultrues showed a low toxicity up to 1000 µg/ml. The lowest two concentrations were not assyed, because enough concentrations were left for cloning. None of the ten treated cultrues showed increases in mutant frequency that were statistically significantly elevated over the concurrent vehicle controls. Therefore, this nonactivation assay was evaluated as negative. In the independent repeat test concentrations from 400 to 1000 µg/ml were cloned, inducing low toxicities. The mutatnt frequencies varied for concentrations up to the maximum applied concentration of 1000µg/ml. The test material was therefore evaluated as nonmutagenic in this trial.

Activation
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

In this study the toxicity and mutagenicity of Benzotriazole was assayed.
Under non-activating conditions only low toxicity could be induced up to the maximum applied concentration (1000 µg/ml).
With S9 metabolic activation the substance is more toxic to the used cells as seen by decreases in relative survival and relative population growth.
In all assays the mutant frequencies were within or near the range that is typical of vehiclecontrol variation between trials (1-15*10^-6), while no dose-respons relationships were evident.
Based on these conclusions, the substance 1H-benzotriazole is considered to be nonmutagenic
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Genetic toxicity in vivo

Description of key information

One study for the endpoint in vivo genetic toxicity is reported. The Micronucleus test does not report any genotoxic properties of the substance.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: OECD-Study with insufficient discussions
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
micronucleus assay
Species:
mouse
Strain:
NMRI
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: F. Winkelmann, Borchen
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 12 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 28 - 42 g
- Assigned to test groups randomly: yes, using a randomisation plan produced by teh Institute of Biometrics, BAYER AG, Wuppertal
- Fasting period before study: no
- Housing: Makrolon cages type I and II, bedding of soft wood granules
- Diet: ad libitum
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 week

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 to 24 °C
- Humidity (%): 50 %
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12
Route of administration:
other: oral stomach tube
Vehicle:
polyethylene glycol 400
Details on exposure:
a pilot study indicated 800 mg / kg bw as concentration for the test.
800 mg /kg bw were dissolved in polyethylene glycol 400.
Via stomach tube 5 ml / kg bw were administered.
Frequency of treatment:
once
Post exposure period:
24 to 72 hours
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
800 mg / kgbw
Basis:
other: nominal in vehicle
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10 animals, 5 male, 5 female
Control animals:
yes
Positive control(s):
cyclophosphamide
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): cyclophosphamide is a known clastogen
- Route of administration: oral via stomach tube
- Doses / concentrations: 20 mg / kg bw, dissolved in demineralised water, 10 ml / kg were administered
Tissues and cell types examined:
bone marrow
Details of tissue and slide preparation:
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION:

1. At least one intact femur was prepared from each
sacrificed animal (not pretreated with a spindIe
inhibitor). A suitale instrument was used to
sever the pelvic bones and calf area.
2. The femur was separated from muscular tissue.
3. The lowerleg stump with knee and all attached
soft parts in the distal epiphyseal cartilage
were remtoved by a gentIe pull at the distal end.
4. The proximal end of the femur was opened at its
extreme end with a suitable instrument, e.g.
fine scissors, so that a small opening of the
bone marrow channel became visible.
5. A suitable tube Has filled with sufficient fetal
calf serum.
6. Some serum was drawn from the tube into a suitable
syringe, with thin cannula.
7. The cannula was pushed into the open end of the
marrow cavity.
8. The femur was then completely immersed in the calf
serum and pressed against the wall of the tube,
so that it could not slip off.
9. The contents were then flushed several times, and
the bone marrow passed into the serum as a fine
suspension.
10. FinaIly, the flushing could be repeated from the
other end after it was opened.
11. The tube containing the serum and bone marrow
was centrifuged in a suitable centrifuge at
approximately 1000 rpm for five minutes.
12. The supernatant was removed with a suitable
pipette (e.g. Pasteur pipette) except for a
small resldue.
13. The sediment was mixed until the suspension
was homogeneous.
14. one drop of the viscous suspension was placed
on the thoroughly cleaned slide and spread
with a suitable object, e.g. a slide, so that
the smear could be properly evaluated.
15. The labeled slides were dried overnight.
If fresh smears are to be stained, they must
be dried for a short period with heat.

Staining of smears
The mears were stained automatically with an Ames Hema-Tek
Slide Stainer of Miles company. The slides were then
"destained" with methanol and rinsed with deionized water.
They were then le ft to dry.

METHOD OF ANALYSIS:
the slides were analysed with a light microscope at a magnification of 1000
Evaluation criteria:
ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythrocytes
Statistics:
The Preventol CI8-100 group with the highest mean, if this
superceded the negative control mean, and the positive
control were checked by Wilcoxon's non-parametric rank sum
test in respect to the count of polychromatic erythrocytes
with micronuelei and the rate of normochromatic
erythrocytes. A variation is considered statistically
significant if its error probability is below 5% and the
treatment group figure is higher than the negative
control's .
The rate of normochromatic erythrocytes with micronuclei is
examined if the micronucleus rate for polychromatic
erythrocytes was allready relevantly increased. In this case,
the group with the highest mean 1s compared with the
negative control using the one-sided chi 2-test. A variation
wss considered statistically significant if the error
probability is below 5% and the treatment group figure is
higher than the negative control's.

In addition, standard deviations (1s ranges) were calculated
for all the means.
Sex:
male/female
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
yes
Vehicle controls validity:
not examined
Negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RESULTS OF RANGE-FINDING STUDY
- Dose range: 500/750/850/1000 mg/kg bw
- Clinical signs of toxicity in test animals: apathy, reduced motility, unkempt coat, lateral position, abdominal position, cramp, convulsion, rapid breathing

RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): No, 0.9 - 1.3 micronucleated cell per 1000 NCE/PCE
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): 1.028 - 1.084

Positive control
- Induction of micronuclei (for Micronucleus assay): No, 0.5 / 13.4 micronucleated cell per 1000 NCE/PCE
- Ratio of PCE/NCE (for Micronucleus assay): 1.133
Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
There is no sign of genotoxicity arising from this study.
In comparison with the negative control, no alteration in the ratio of polychromatic to normochromatic erythocytes was observed.
Further, there is no variation in regard to incidence of micronucleated cells between the negative control and the test groups.
In the positive control group there is a significant change in the incidence of micronuclei compared to the negative control.
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

Additional information from genetic toxicity in vitro:

The three performed studies were GLP compliant and of high quality (Klimisch score = 1). Therefore, there is no reason to believe that these results would not be applicable to humans.


Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
well performed study according to OECD Guidelines

Justification for classification or non-classification

The available information is conclusive but not sufficient for classification.