Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Repeated dose toxicity: oral

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
short-term repeated dose toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
29 Nov 2005 - 28 Apr 2006
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
No neurobehavioural examinations.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2006
Report date:
2006

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 1995
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no neurobehavioural examinations
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 407 (Repeated Dose 28-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 2008
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no endocrine disruptor endpoints addressed
GLP compliance:
yes
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Reference substance 001
Cas Number:
85883-73-4
Test material form:
liquid
Remarks:
colourless

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Inc., Raleigh, NC, USA
- Age at study initiation: approximately 7 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 216 - 250 g (males) and 163 - 196 g (females)
- Housing: animals were housed individually in clean, stainless steel, wire-mesh cages suspended above cage-board
- Diet: certified Rodent LabDiet 5002 (meal) (PMI Nutrition International, LLC), ad libitum
- Water: municipal water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 14 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22 ± 3
- Humidity (%): 50 ± 20
- Air changes (per hr): 10
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on oral exposure:
PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The test article was administered neat. The dose volumes used to obtain the desired dose levels were based on the specific gravity of the test article (0.9450) at approximately 20°C.
The test and control articles were warmed to room temperature prior to administration and stirred continuously throughout the preparation and dose administration procedures.
Duration of treatment / exposure:
28 days
Frequency of treatment:
once daily, 7 days/week
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
Dose / conc.:
500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Dose / conc.:
1 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
Dose / conc.:
2 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
No. of animals per sex per dose:
10 (treatment groups 1-4, toxicology groups)
3 (toxicokinetic group 1A)
9 (toxicokinetic groups 2A-4A)
Control animals:
other: Yes, water at the highest dosage volume (2.65 mL/kg)

Examinations

Observations and examinations performed and frequency:
CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: twice daily
- Cage side observations checked: mortality, moribundity, clinical signs

DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: weekly, beginning 1 week prior to test article administration and prior to the scheduled necrosy

BODY WEIGHT: Yes, mean body weights and mean body weight changes
- Time schedule for examinations: at least weekly

FOOD CONSUMPTION: Yes, g/animal/day
- Time schedule for examinations: weekly

OPHTHALMOSCOPIC EXAMINATION: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: prior to the initiation of dose administration and near the end of the treatment period
- Dose groups that were examined: toxicology groups

HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: at the scheduled necropsy
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes, blood was collected for haematology and serum chemistry evaluations prior to necropsy from a retro-orbital sinus from animals anesthetised with isoflurane and from the vena cava from animals anesthetised with carbon dioxide for coagulation evaluations
- Animals fasted: Yes, overnight
- How many animals: toxicology groups
- Parameters checked: total leukocyte count, erythrocyte count, haemoglobin, haematocrit, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular haemoglobin, mean corpuscular haemoglobin concentration, platelet count, prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, reticulocyte count percent and absolute, differential leukocyte count -percent and absolute -neutrophil -lymphocyte -monocyte -eosinophil -basophil -large unstained cell

CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: at the scheduled necropsy
- Animals fasted: Yes, overnight
- How many animals: toxicology groups
- Parameters checked: albumin, total protein, globulin [by calculation], albumin/globulin ratio [by calculation], total bilirubin, urea nitrogen, creatinine, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, creatine kinase, glucose, total cholesterol, calcium, chloride, phosphorus, potassium, sodium, triglycerides

URINALYSIS: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of urine: at the scheduled necropsy
- Metabolism cages used for collection of urine: Yes
- Animals fasted: Yes, overnight
- Parameters checked: specific gravity, pH, total volume, colour, clarity, protein, glucose, urobilinogen, ketones, bilirubin, occult blood, leukocytes, microscopy of sediment

TOXICOKINETICS: No
- Since there were no adverse effects at the high-dose level and no differences between clinical findings in the low- and high-dose levels, determination of plasma drug levels was not considered necessary.
Sacrifice and pathology:
GROSS PATHOLOGY: Yes, on all animals. The necropsies included, but were not limited to, examination of the external surface, all orifices, and the cranial, thoracic, abdominal and pelvic cavities, including viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: Yes, microscopic examination was performed on gross lesions from all animals and on all tissues listed below from all animals in the control and 2500 mg/kg/day groups at the scheduled necropsy:
adrenal glands (2), aorta, bone with marrow, femur, sternum, bone marrow smear, brain, cerebrum level 1, cerebrum level 2, cerebellum with medulla/pons, epididymides, exorbital lacrimal glands (2), eyes with optic nerve (2), gastrointestinal tract, esophagus, stomach, duodenum, jejunum, ileum, cecum, colon, rectum, harderian glands (2), heart, kidneys (2), liver (sections of 2 lobes), lungs (including bronchi, fixed by inflation with fixative), lymph nodes, mandibular (2), mesenteric, mammary glands (females only), ovaries with oviducts (2), pancreas, peripheral nerve (sciatic), pituitary, prostate, salivary glands, [submandibular (2)], seminal vesicles (2), skeletal muscle (rectus femoris), skin, spinal cord (cervical, midthoracic, lumbar), spleen, testes (2), thymus, thyroid [with parathyroids(2)], tongue, trachea, urinary bladder (inflated with fixative), uterus with cervix, vagina, all gross lesions
Other examinations:
The following organs were weighed from all animals at the scheduled necropsy: adrenal glands, brain, epididymides, heart, kidneys, liver, ovaries with oviducts, pituitary, prostate, spleen, testes, thymus, thyroid with parathyroids, uterus, paired organs were weighed together
Statistics:
Body weight, body weight change, food consumption, clinical pathology and organ weight data were subjected to a parametric 1-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (Snedecor and Cochran, 1980) to determine intergroup differences. If the ANOVA revealed statistically significant (p < 0.05) intergroup variance, Dunnett's test (Dunnett, 1964) was used to compare the test article-treated groups to the control group.

Results and discussion

Results of examinations

Clinical signs:
effects observed, treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Test article-related clinical observations were noted in the 500, 1500 and 2500 mg/kg/day groups. These findings consisted of evidence of excessive salivation including clear material noted around the mouth and yellow or red material around the mouth and nose and on the forelimbs, hind limbs, ventral neck and ventral trunk. In general, the males and females within each test article-treated group were equally affected with the highest incidence for these findings occurring in the 2500 mg/kg/day group. In the absence of associated test article-related effects on body weight parameters and food consumption, the test article-related clinical observations noted at 500, 1500 and 2500 mg/kg/day were not considered adverse.
Mortality:
no mortality observed
Body weight and weight changes:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Body weights were unaffected by test article administration.
Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Statistically significant lower mean food consumption was noted in the 2500 mg/kg/day group (males) during study Week 3 to 4 when compared to the control group. Because there were no other remarkable changes in food consumption for this group over the course of the dosing period and no concurrent effects on body weights were observed, the lower food consumption was not considered to be test article-related.
Food efficiency:
not examined
Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
not examined
Ophthalmological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
No ophthalmic lesions indicative of toxicity were observed.
Haematological findings:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Mean white blood cell counts and absolute lymphocyte counts were slightly, but statistically significantly higher in the 1500 and 2500 mg/kg/day group in male animals when compared to the control group. Because similar trends were not observed in females, the counts were within the historical control data range and no microscopic correlates were noted, the elevated white blood cell and lymphocyte counts in males were not considered to be test article-related.
Clinical biochemistry findings:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Mean triglyceride levels were slightly, but statistically significantly higher in the 1500 and 2500 mg/kg/day group in male animals, and mean phosphorus levels were slightly, but statistically significantly higher in all test article-treated female groups when compared to the control group. Triglyceride levels were not significantly increased in females and phosphorus levels were not significantly elevated in males at corresponding doses. Furthermore, triglyceride and phosphorus levels were within the historical control data range. Non-concordance of serum chemistry changes in the opposite sex along with the absence of microscopic correlates indicated that the mean triglyceride and phosphorus differences from the control group means were not test article-related. In addition, statistically significantly lower mean alkaline phosphatase in the 1500 mg/kg/day group males and mean alanine aminotransferase in the 2500 mg/kg/day group males were observed compared to the control group. These lower values were not attributed to the test article because toxic insult almost invariably results in increased serum aminotransferase levels rather than reduced values.
Urinalysis findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
Urinalysis parameters were unaffected by test article administration.
Behaviour (functional findings):
not examined
Immunological findings:
not examined
Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
effects observed, non-treatment-related
Description (incidence and severity):
Mean absolute thyroid/parathyroid weight in the 2500 mg/kg/day group females was slightly, but statistically significantly, lower than the control group value (-19.8% change in comparison to the control group). Because a similar trend was not observed in males, the weight was within the historical control data range and there were no microscopic correlates, this lower thyroid/parathyroid weight in the 2500 mg/kg/day group females was not considered to be test article-related.
Gross pathological findings:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no test article-related macroscopic findings.
Neuropathological findings:
not examined
Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
no effects observed
Description (incidence and severity):
There were no test article-related microscopic findings. All findings were considered to represent common, spontaneous alterations in laboratory rats or minor changes associated with necropsy artefact or gavage procedures.
Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
no effects observed

Effect levels

Key result
Dose descriptor:
NOAEL
Effect level:
>= 2 500 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
Based on:
test mat.
Sex:
male/female
Basis for effect level:
other: no adverse effects observed

Target system / organ toxicity

Key result
Critical effects observed:
no

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1. Results of haematology (males).

Parameter

Dose group [mg/kg bw/day]

 

0

500

1500

2500

Leukocytes,Week 4 (1000/µL)

Mean

% change

S.D.

N

 

 

9.92

 

1.909

10

 

 

12.36

24.6

1.854

10

 

 

13.12**

32.3

2.614

10

 

 

12.71*

28.1

2.479

10

Lymphocytes absolute, Week 4 (1000/µL)

Mean

% change

S.D.

N

 

 

8.10

 

1.892

10

 

 

10.43

28.8

1.968

10

 

 

11.05*

36.4

2.559

10

 

 

10.88*

34.3

2.110

10

*: Significantly different from the control group at 0.05 using Dunnett´s test.

**: Significantly different from the control group at 0.01 using Dunnett´s test.

Table 2. Results of clinical chemistry (males).

Parameter

Dose group [mg/kg bw/day]

 

0

500

1500

2500

Alkaline phosphatase,Week 4 (U/L)

Mean

% change

S.D.

N

 

 

208

 

47.7

10

 

 

189

-9.1

36.7

10

 

 

163*

-21.6

29.8

10

 

 

173

-16.8

29.1

10

Alanine transferase, Week 4 (U/L)

Mean

% change

S.D.

N

 

 

48

 

5.8

10

 

 

44

-8.3

5.7

10

 

 

41

-14.6

6.3

10

 

 

40*

-16.7

7.9

10

Triglycerides, Week 4 (U/L)

Mean

% change

S.D.

N

 

50

 

11.3

10

 

52

4.0

9.1

10

 

68**

36.0

16.0

10

 

66*

32.0

11.4

10

*: Significantly different from the control group at 0.05 using Dunnett´s test.

**: Significantly different from the control group at 0.01 using Dunnett´s test.

Table 3. Results of clinical chemistry (females).

Parameter

Dose group [mg/kg bw/day]

 

0

500

1500

2500

Phosphorus,Week 4 (mg/100 mL)

Mean

% change

S.D.

N

 

 

7.2

 

0.57

10

 

 

8.2*

13.9

1.01

10

 

 

8.4*

16.7

0.78

10

 

 

8.6**

19.4

1.16

10

*: Significantly different from the control group at 0.05 using Dunnett´s test.

**: Significantly different from the control group at 0.01 using Dunnett´s test.

Applicant's summary and conclusion