Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP study according EU/OECD guideline.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2006

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of study:
mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
N1-[4-(1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropan-2-yl)-2-methylphenyl]-N2-(1-methanesulfinyl-2-methylpropan-2-yl)benzene-1,2-dicarboxamide
EC Number:
609-338-9
Cas Number:
371771-07-2
Molecular formula:
C23H23F7N2O3S
IUPAC Name:
N1-[4-(1,1,1,2,3,3,3-heptafluoropropan-2-yl)-2-methylphenyl]-N2-(1-methanesulfinyl-2-methylpropan-2-yl)benzene-1,2-dicarboxamide

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
NMRI
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (LLNA)

Vehicle:
dimethylformamide
Concentration:
0; 2; 10 and 50%
No. of animals per dose:
6 mice per group

Results and discussion

In vivo (LLNA)

Results
Parameter:
SI
Remarks on result:
other: The NMRI mice did not show an increase in the stimulation indices for cell counts or for weights of the draining lymph nodes after application of the test substance.

Any other information on results incl. tables

The study indicate that the LLNA/MDS does neither point to a non-specific (irritating) nor to a specific immunostimulating (sensitizing) potential of the test substance.

This applies to NMRI mice, for weight and cell counts of the draining lymph nodes as well as ear swelling and ear weight indices evaluated after epicutaneous application of the test substance onto both ears of the animals.

Taken together, no activation of the cells of the immune system via dermal route was determined after application of up to and including 50% of the test substance by the method used. Therefore, the concentration of 50% turned out to be the NOEL for the parameters investigated in this study.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Executive summary:

The results show that the test substance has neither an irritating nor a sensitizing potential in mice after dermal application.