Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 212-073-8 | CAS number: 759-94-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- comparable to guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 986
- Report date:
- 1986
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Clives et.al 1979
- Version / remarks:
- Clives et.al 1979, Mutat.Res.59, 61-108
- Deviations:
- not specified
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The method-Clives et.al 1979, Mutat.Res.59, 61-108 - is comparable to OECD TG 490 guideline.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian cell gene mutation tests using the thymidine kinase gene
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- EPTC = EPTAM
- IUPAC Name:
- EPTC = EPTAM
- Details on test material:
- formulated product of EPTC
Constituent 1
Method
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- L517BY mouse lym~homa cells heterozygous for thFmldlne klnase (TK+/-),
clone 3.7.2C initially obtained from D. Clive, Burroughs Wellcome, NC
(Clive et al., 1979), were used as target cells. - Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not applicable
- Cytokinesis block (if used):
- na
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- An Aroclor 1254-1nduced rat-liver homogenate preparation ($9) was used as the metabolic activation system. Liver enzymes were induced by in~ecting adult m~le rats with Aroclor 1254 (500 mg/kg) 5 days before sacrifice.
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- The results of the preliminary cytotoxlcity experiments (Table I),
suggested that the maximum concentrations for the mutagenlcity assays,
based on the toxicity of the test article, should be between 140 and 233
~g/ml without activation, and between 233 and 389 ~g/ml with activation.
Concentrations of EPTC from 389 to 5000 ~g/ml were immiscible in the
culture medium at the time of exposure; the medium containing 389 tp 1800
~g/ml was cloudy and oily drbplets appeared at 3000 and 5000 Bg/ml. After
the 4-hour exposure period, the cloudiness had dissipated but the oily
droplets appeared~s opaque, white droplets that floated on the surface of
the culture medium. - Vehicle / solvent:
- ethanol (final concentration less than 1 % of the final volume)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 3-methylcholanthrene
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Procedural Detail
The experimental procedure was adapted from one described by Clive
and associates (1975, 1979). For each culture, 6 x 106 cells In i0 ml of
medium, with or without the metabolic activation mixture, ’were prepared in
a sterile 50-ml centrifuge tube. After addition of the test or control
articles, the centrl6uge tubes were rotated for 4 hr in a roller drum at
37°C. Following the exposure, the treatment solutions were removed and
the cells were washed by a series of low-speed centrlfugations (i000 rpm,
8 mln), each followed by removal of the supernatant and resuspenslon of
the cells in 20 ml of fresh Fl0p. The tubes were then rotated in a roller
drum for 2 days at 37°C for expression of any mutations. Cell growth was
monitored daily by.countlng a tenfold dilution of the cells in 0.1%
trypsin with a Coulter counter. The cells were diluted to 3 x 105
cells/ml each day during the expression period.
After the expression period, approximately 3 x 106 cells from each
culture were seeded in cloning medium supplemented with TFT for selection
of TFTr cells, and approximately 600 cells were seeded in cloning medium
without TFT to determine the percentage of viable TK+/- cells. ~fter
cultivation of the cells for ii to 12 days at 37°C in an atmosphere containing 5% C02-1n-alr, the colonies of cells in each petrl dish were
counted using an automatic colony counter with a standard 50-mm lens. - Evaluation criteria:
- Analysis of Results. ~
The following criteria are based on SRI’s experience and on values
published in the literature. Only experiments meeting the criteria for
acceptability are evaluated for mutagenic response~ and experiments that
do not meet the criteria are repeated. Because the mouse lymphoma mutegenesis assay is a complex biological system~ exceptions to these criteriamay be Justlfled. In these cases, the reasons are clearly stated in the report. The final interpretation of the results is the responsibility of the Study Director. - Statistics:
- The mutation frequency of each culture (the ratio of the number of
mutant cells to the number of viable cells) was calculated by dividing the
number of TFTr colonies by 5,000 times the number of unselectad (viable)
colonies obs.erved in the plates without TFT. The average mutation frequencies of the solvent and positive control cultures and each set of cell
cultures treated with a single concentration of the test article were calculated. Toxicity was evaluated based on the growth of treated cells in
suspension and in the cloning medium relative to the solvent control cultures (relative total growth).
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with
- Genotoxicity:
- positive
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- True negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- Sizing measurements were made on TFT-reststant ~olonies from the
mutagenesis experiment with activation (App~dlx B). The dfstrihutlons
colony sizes are shown in Figure I. The spproximate numbers of small and
large colonies in each culture are listed in Table 4. These data demonstt~ate that the test article induces an increase primarily in the frequency of sm~ll TFTr colonies, by a mechanism which is not yet known.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- In the mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay performed in 1986 the EPTC proved to be negative without metabolic activation and positive with metabolic activiation.
- Executive summary:
The study to investigate the mutagenlc potential of EPTC in the mouse
lymphoma cell assay was initiated on 23 May 1985, and the laboratory work
was comple.ted on 18 June 1985. The study was conducted according to the
specific protocol "Mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis a~say (TK +/- ÷ TK -/-)
of EPTC~’° Results of the experiments conducted urlng this study are
shown in Tables I-4 and Figure i. All experiments fullfiled the criteria
for acceptable experiments and were used to evaluate the potential
mutagenicity of the test article.
The results of the preliminary cytotoxlcity experiments (Table I),
suggested that the maximum concentrations for the mutagenlcity assays,
based on the toxicity of the test article, should be between 140 and 233
~g/ml without activation, and between 233 and 389 ~g/ml with activation.
Concentrations of EPTC from 389 to 5000 ~g/ml were immiscible in the
culture medium at the time of exposure; the medium containing 389 tp 1800
~g/ml was cloudy and oily drbplets appeared at 3000 and 5000 Bg/ml. After
the 4-hour exposure period, the cloudiness had dissipated but the oily
droplets appeared~s opaque, white droplets that floated on the surface of
the culture medium.
Six concentrations of EPTC ranging from i18 to 200 ~g/ml.were tested
without activation. Neither a concentration-related increase in the
number Of mutant colonies nor a two-fold increase in the average mutation
frequency relative to the solvent controls was observed in the experiment
without activation (Table 2). Although the treatment with the highest
concentration resulted in relatively low toxicity (an average relative
total growth of 69%), th~’s concentration was within a one-tenth log
interval of a higher-concentration (233 ~g/ml) that reduced the relative
growth of cells to less than i% in the prior study. Therefore, based on
the criteria stated in the protocol, the test results for EPTC were
considered negative without activation.
In cultures treated with six concentrations of EPTC (from 42 to 250
~g/ml) with activation, the numbers of mutant colonies were 3 to 4 times
the number in the solvent control cultures. The average mutation frequency at each concentration increased from 3.7 to 6.1 times the solvent control levels (Table 3). These results fulfilled the criteria for a positive
response.
Sizing measurements were made on TFT-reststant ~olonies from the
mutagenesis experiment with activation (App~dlx B). The dfstrihutlons
colony sizes are shown in Figure I. The spproximate numbers of small and
large colonies in each culture are listed in Table 4. These data demonstt~ate that the test article induces an increase primarily in the frequency of sm~ll TFTr colonies, by a mechanism which is not yet known.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.