Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Comparable to guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1982
Report date:
1982

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Methyl acrylate
EC Number:
202-500-6
EC Name:
Methyl acrylate
Cas Number:
96-33-3
Molecular formula:
C4H6O2
IUPAC Name:
methyl prop-2-enoate
Details on test material:
- Test substance: Methylacrylat
- Test substance No.: 82/22
- Analytical purity: ca. 99.95 %

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: New Zealand, unspecified
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Gaukler, Offenbach/Main, D
- Weight at study initiation: 2.91 kg (males); 2.98 kg (females)
- Acclimation period: 8 d


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 26
- Humidity (%): ca. 30 - 70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Test system

Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: untreated skin sites of the same animals
Amount / concentration applied:
0.5 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
1 or 4 h
Observation period:
7 d
Number of animals:
6 (3 per sex)
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 3x3cm, upper third of the flank/ back region
- Type of wrap if used: Hansamed plaster, Beiersdorf AG, D


REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): Lutrol and Lutrol/water 1:1

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
4 h exposure
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.17
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 d
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
4 h exposure
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.44
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 d
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
1 h exposure
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.44
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 d
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
1 h exposure
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
2.33
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
not fully reversible within: 7 d

Any other information on results incl. tables

Exposition:

4 h semi-occlusive

Animal

Reading

Erythema

Edema

Comment

1

1 h

2

3

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

2

1 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

3

1 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

4

1 h

2

2

erythema and edema overlapping

5

1 h

2

3

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

6

1 h

3

3

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

1

24 h

2

2

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

2

24 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

3

24 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

4

24 h

2

2

erythema and edema overlapping

5

24 h

2

3

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

6

24 h

3

3

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

1

48 h

2

2

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

2

48 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

3

48 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

4

48 h

2

2

erythema and edema overlapping

5

48 h

2

2

erythema and edema overlapping

6

48 h

3

2

erythema overlapping

1

72 h

2

2

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

2

72 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

3

72 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

4

72 h

2

2

erythema and edema overlapping

5

72 h

2

2

erythema and edema overlapping

6

72 h

3

2

erythema overlapping

1

7 d

2

1

scaling

2

7 d

1

0

 

3

7 d

2

1

 

4

7 d

1

0

scaling

5

7 d

1

0

erythema overlapping, scaling

6

7 d

2

1

strong scaling, edema overlapping

mean

24 - 72 h

2.17

2.44

 

Exposition:

1 h semi-occlusive

Animal

Reading

Erythema

Edema

Comment

1

1 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

2

1 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

3

1 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

4

1 h

2

2

erythema and edema overlapping

5

1 h

2

3

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

6

1 h

3

3

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

1

24 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

2

24 h

2

3

erythema and edema overlapping

3

24 h

2

3

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

4

24 h

2

2

erythema and edema overlapping

5

24 h

1

2

erythema and edema overlapping

6

24 h

3

3

erythema and edema overlapping

1

48 h

2

2

erythema and edema overlapping

2

48 h

3

3

erythema and edema overlapping

3

48 h

3

3

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

4

48 h

2

1

erythema and edema overlapping

5

48 h

4

2

necrosis, edema overlapping

6

48 h

2

3

edema overlapping

1

72 h

2

2

erythema and edema overlapping

2

72 h

3

3

erythema and edema overlapping

3

72 h

3

3

erythema overlapping, hemorragic; edema overlapping

4

72 h

2

1

 

5

72 h

4

2

necrosis, edema overlapping

6

72 h

2

1

 

1

7 d

1

0

scaling

2

7 d

1

0

 

3

7 d

2

1

scaling, erythema and edema overlapping

4

7 d

0

0

scaling

5

7 d

4

1

superficial necrosis; edema overlapping

6

7 d

1

0

scaling, erythema overlapping

mean

24 - 72 h

2.44

2.33

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU