Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin sensitisation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well documented GLP study.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2001

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
OECD 406 (skin Sensitisation)
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
Buehler test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,18-octadecanedioic acid
EC Number:
442-490-2
EC Name:
1,18-octadecanedioic acid
Cas Number:
871-70-5
Molecular formula:
C18H34O4
IUPAC Name:
octadecanedioic acid
Constituent 2
Reference substance name:
1,18 Octadecanedioic acid
IUPAC Name:
1,18 Octadecanedioic acid
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): 1,18 Octadecanedioic acid
- Physical state: white solid
- Analytical purity: 100%

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
other:
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
other: dermal
Vehicle:
other: corn oil
Concentration / amount:
Inductions: 30 %
Challenge: 30 %
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: corn oil
Concentration / amount:
Inductions: 30 %
Challenge: 30 %
No. of animals per dose:
30

Results and discussion

Any other information on results incl. tables

All test animals and controls showed no skin effects (0%). Not sensitizing in guinea pigs.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information