Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
06 - 23 Apr 2009
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study with acceptable restrictions
Remarks:
Due to the nature of the test item, analytical measurement is not possible.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2009
Report date:
2009

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
2006
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
temperature exceeded 23 ±2 °C
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: No.23-Guidance document on aquatic toxicity testing of difflcult substances and mixtures
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED KlNGDOM, UK GLP Monitoring Authority

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Vapour grown graphitic carbon fibre
Molecular formula:
C
IUPAC Name:
Vapour grown graphitic carbon fibre

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
no
Remarks:
Due to the nature of the test item, analytical measurement is not possible.

Test solutions

Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Differential loading: For each nominal concentration the required amount of homogenised sample was added to 500 mL of culture medium in an aspirator. The aspirators were mixed for 48 h at 21 to 23 °C and then allowed to separate for four hours. The aqueous phase, avoiding all settled and floating material, was drawn off and filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The resultant solution was used as the test exposure solution.
- Controls: test medium without test material

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Green algae
- Strain: CCAP 278/4
- Source: Culture Collection of Algae and Protozoa, lnstitute of Freshwater Ecology Windermere Laboratory
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): Exponential phase
- Method of cultivation: The tests and culture were performed in deionised water with added nutrients. Before use the water was sterilised by autoclaving at 120 °C for 30 min. Sterile nutrient stock solutions were then added and the pH value adjusted to 8.0 ± 0.2 to obtain the culture medium.

ACCLIMATION
- Culturing media and conditions: Temperature: 23 ± 2 °C, Illumination: 6000 - 10000 lux continous white light, Shaking: 200 rpm

Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h

Test conditions

Test temperature:
23.3 - 26.5 °C (26.5 °C was measured at test end in test and control treatments)
temperature exceeded 23 ± 2 °C
pH:
7.1 - 7.9 (Control)
7.1 - 7.6 (Test item concentrations)
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Control, 10, 18, 32, 56, 100 mg/L (nominal loading rate)
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
Test vessel:
- Type: open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 250 mL conical glass flask; 100 mL test solution, 150 mL headspace
- Initial cells density: 1 x 10E+04 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: 141.1 x 10E+04 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6

GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: De-ionised,flltered and sterilised by autoclaving at 120 °C for 30 min.
- Culture medium different from test medium: Same medium
- Intervals of water quality measurement: At test start and test end.

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: Continously
- Light intensity and quality: 6000 to 10000 lux white light

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
- Determination of cell concentrations: Cell density was determined after 24, 48 and 72 h exposure periods. The cell counts were made using a haemocytometer and microscope. Cells, which showed abnormalities were included in the count but also reported in the observation chapter.

TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 1.8
Range finding study
- Test concentrations: Control, 0.1, 1.0, 10 and 100 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: Percent of inhibition by growth rate 4, 3, 3 and 21% at 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 mg/L.
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
Potassium dichromate

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL10
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: not possible to calculate 95% confidence limits
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL20
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: not possible to calculate 95% confidence limits
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
> 100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: not possible to calculate 95% confidence limits
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOELR
Effect conc.:
100 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test): All cells appeared normal, no cells were observed that showed any morphological abnormalities.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- Results with reference substance valid? yes
- EC50 (72 h): 0.84 mg/L for growth rate (historical data: ErC50 (72 h): 0.86 mg/L)
Reported statistics and error estimates:
The statistical evaluation was caclulated with the program ToxCalcTMVersion 5.0 “Comprehensive Toxicity Data Analysis and Database software.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Biological Results

Table 1: Cell numbers (mean initial cell density: 1 x 10E+04 cells/mL)

Loading rate

Replicate

Cell density measurements (cells/mL x 10E+04)

[mg/L]

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

0

1

5.0

21.3

130.7

2

5.7

26.7

139.0

3

5.0

17.7

126.0

4

4.3

21.3

154.0

5

7.3

29.7

159.7

6

6.0

18.3

137.0

Mean

5.6

22.5

141.1

10

1

4.3

17.0

95.0

2

5.3

17.7

153.3

3

5.3

15.0

88.7

Mean

5.0

16.6

112.3

18

1

4.0

15.3

92.7

2

7.0

19.0

90.0

3

5.3

15.3

74.0

Mean

5.4

16.5

85.6

32

1

7.7

17.0

80.7

2

6.7

17.0

139.7

3

4.0

16.7

68.7

Mean

6.1

16.9

96.4

56

1

5.3

11.0

116.3

2

5.0

15.0

89.7

3

4.3

10.7

72.7

Mean

4.9

12.2

92.9

100

1

4.0

16.0

109.0

2

3.3

16.3

90.7

3

5.3

12.3

88.3

Mean

4.2

14.9

96.0

 Table 2: Inhibition of growth rate

Loading rate

Percent inhibition by growth rate

[mg/L]

0 - 48 h

0 – 72 h

10

9

5

18

10

10

32

9

9

56

20

9

100

13

8

 

Table 3: Endpoints ELx and NOELR values by growth rate (based on the nominal loading rate)

Periode of exposure

ErLx value

[h]

ErL10

ErL20

ErL50

0 to 48 h

>100 mg/L*

>100 mg/L*

>100 mg/L*

0 to 72 h

>100 mg/L*

>100 mg/L*

>100 mg/L*

NOELR

100 mg/L (0 – 72 hours)

* Not possible to calculate 95% confidence limits

Table 4: Validity criteria

Criterion from the guideline

Outcome

Validity criterion fulfilled

The biomass in the control cultures should have increased exponentially by a factor of at least 16 within the 72-hour test period.

141

Yes

The mean coefficient of variation for section-by-section specific growth rates (days 0-1, 1-2 and 2-3, for 72-hour tests) in the control cultures must not exceed 35%

16.78

Yes

The coefficient of variation of average specific growth rates during the whole test period in replicate control cultures must not exceed 7% in tests with Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and Desmodesmus subspicatus. For other less frequently tested species, the value should not exceed 10%.

1.94

Yes

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Remarks:
For further details please refer to “Any other information on results incl. tables”.