Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
8 - 27 Nov 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2018
Report date:
2018

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted in 1997
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
Departement of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
ε-Caprolactone, oligomers, esters with acrylic acid and 2,2,2',2'-tetrakis (hydroxymethyl)-3,3'-oxydipropan-1-ol
EC Number:
500-276-7
EC Name:
ε-Caprolactone, oligomers, esters with acrylic acid and 2,2,2',2'-tetrakis (hydroxymethyl)-3,3'-oxydipropan-1-ol
Cas Number:
89800-10-2
Molecular formula:
{(C10H16O7).(C3H3O)b.[(C6H10O2)m.(C3H3O)a]} (i.e., UVCB substance)
IUPAC Name:
ε-Caprolactone, oligomers, esters with acrylic acid and 2,2,2',2'-tetrakis (hydroxymethyl)-3,3'-oxydipropan-1-ol

Method

Target gene:
his, trp operon
Species / strainopen allclose all
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Species / strain / cell type:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
not applicable
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
post mitochondrial supernatant (S9) prepared from livers of Phenobarbital/β-naphthoflavone-induced male rats
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Experiment 1 (plate incorporation): 1.5, 5, 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500 and 5000 μg/plate
Experiment 2 (preincubation): 15, 50, 150, 500, 1500, 5000 μg/plate
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: due to good solubility
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Remarks:
untreated
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide
9-aminoacridine
benzo(a)pyrene
other: N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (ENNG), 2-aminoanthracene (2AA)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: plate incorporation test for the initial mutation test and a pre-incubation test for the confirmatory mutation test

DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Exposure duration: 48 h

NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: triplicate

DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: background lawn
Evaluation criteria:
A test item is considered mutagenic, if one or more criteria are fulfilled:
- a dose-related increase in the number of revertants occurs
- a reproducible increase at one or more concentrations
- biological relevance against in-house historical control ranges
- statistical analysis of data as determined by UKEMS
- fold increase > 2 times the concurrent solvent control (3 times for TA1535 and TA1537) for any tester strain (especially if accompanied by an out-of-historical range response)

A test item will be considered non-mutagenic (negative) in the test system if the above criteria are not met.
Although most experiments will give clear positive or negative results, in some instances the data generated will prohibit making a definite judgment about test item activity. Results of this type will be reported as equivocal.

The tests (Initial and Confirmatory Mutation Tests) are considered valid if:
- All bacterial strains must have demonstrated the required characteristics as determined by their respective strain checks according to Ames et al., (1975), Maron and Ames (1983), Mortelmans and Zeiger (2000), Green and Muriel (1976) and Mortelmans and Riccio (2000).
- All tester strain cultures should exhibit a characteristic number of spontaneous revertants per plate in the vehicle and untreated controls (negative controls).
- All tester strain cultures should be in the range of 0.9 - 9 x 10^9 bacteria per mL.
- Diagnostic mutagens (positive control chemicals) must be included to demonstrate both the intrinsic sensitivity of the tester strains to mutagen exposure and the integrity of the S9-mix. All of the positive control chemicals used in the study should induce marked increases in the frequency of revertant colonies, both with or without metabolic activation.
- There should be a minimum of four non-toxic test item dose levels.
- There should be no evidence of excessive contamination.
Statistics:
Statistical significance was confirmed by using Dunnetts Regression Analysis (* = p < 0.05) for those values that indicate statistically significant increases in the frequency of revertant colonies compared to the concurrent solvent control. Values that the program concluded as statistically significant but were within the in-house historical profile were not reported.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2 uvr A
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Other confounding effects: A fine test item film (greasy in appearance) was noted at 5000 μg/plate, this observation did not prevent the scoring of revertant colonies.

RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: There was no visible reduction in the growth of the bacterial background lawn at any dose level, either in the presence or absence of metabolic activation (S9-mix), in the first mutation test (plate incorporation method). Consequently, the same maximum dose level was used as the maximum dose in the second mutation test.

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%)
please refer to table 3 in "any other information on results incl. tables"

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 1: Test results (experiment 1, plate incorporation)

With or without S9-Mix

Test substance concentration (μL/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies per plate
(average of 3 plates)

Frameshift type

Base-pair substitution type

TA98

TA1537

TA100

TA1535

WP2

uvr A

Negative control (untreated)

16

7

78

16

21

Solvent control (DMSO)

16 ± 3.8

12 ± 1.5

78 ± 7.0

14 ± 3.5

20 ± 4.4

1.5

12 ± 1.0

7 ± 1.5

74 ± 4.2

16 ± 4.2

19 ± 1.7

5

18 ± 2.5

9 ± 0.6

73 ± 11.5

16 ± 3.6

17 ± 2.6

15

20 ± 7.5

11 ± 3.5

78 ± 12.5

14 ± 3.2

20 ± 2.0

50

13 ± 4.0

13 ± 3.8

86 ± 13.7

15 ± 1.5

17 ± 2.5

150

14 ± 2.1

7 ± 3.0

81 ± 4.6

16 ± 7.8

14 ± 8.1

500

15 ± 5.5

6 ± 3.6

82 ± 10.6

14 ± 2.3

23 ± 3.6

1500

18 ± 7.2

10 ± 0.6

79 ± 11.9

18 ± 5.8

23 ± 6.1

5000

14 ± 5.3

10 ± 4.5

94 ± 3.2

19 ± 3.0

24 ± 4.0

Positive controls (µg/plate)

4NQO
(0.2)

9AA
(80)

ENNG
(3)

ENNG
(5)

ENNG
(2)

Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 plates)

150 ± 37.8

239 ± 15.6

369 ± 82.7

225 ± 88.6

568 ± 149.2

+

Solvent control (DMSO)

19 ± 4.4

12 ± 3.8

81 ± 6.6

13 ± 2.3

33 ± 5.1

1.5

16 ± 5.5

8 ± 3.0

79 ± 6.0

12 ± 3.5

19 ± 6.1

5

17 ± 4.4

10 ± 6.4

87 ± 1.2

13 ± 2.1

25 ± 4.6

15

20 ± 2.6

10 ± 0.6

90 ± 12.9

18 ± 2.3

22 ± 3.6

50

16 ± 4.6

7 ± 1.5

85 ± 3.6

17 ± 7.0

23 ± 2.6

150

17 ± 1.5

11 ± 2.5

79 ± 10.1

12 ± 8.7

24 ± 5.1

500

19 ± 4.6

10 ± 2.6

90 ± 13.5

18 ± 4.0

18 ± 2.9

1500

18 ± 4.4

6 ± 2.3

84 ± 4.0

16 ± 4.4

28 ± 4.6

5000

22 ± 2.5

9 ± 6.1

81 ± 10.1

17 ± 7.0

25 ± 2.3

Positive controls 

(µg/plate)

B(a)P
(5)

2AA
(2)

2AA
(1)

2AA
(2)

2AA
(10)

Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 plates)

184 ± 10.4

249 ± 59.0

1732 ± 563.3

260 ± 15.7

205 ± 16.0

2AA = 2-aminoanthracene

4NQO = 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide

9AA = 9-aminoacridine

B(a)P = benzo(a)pyrene

ENNG = N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

Table 2: Test results (experiment 2, preincubation)

With or without S9-Mix

Test substance concentration (μL/plate)

Mean number of revertant colonies per plate
(average of 3 plates ± SD)

Frameshift type

Base-pair substitution type

TA98

TA1537

TA100

TA1535

WP2 uvr A

Negative control (untreated)

23

17

101

13

29

Solvent control (DMSO)

25 ± 7.0

18 ± 5.0

84 ± 9.5

11 ± 1.2

32 ± 6.0

15

20 ± 2.1

21 ± 2.9

84 ± 5.5

9 ± 3.1

34 ± 4.7

50

19 ± 2.6

20 ± 3.2

88 ± 17.0

12 ± 4.6

26 ± 8.5

150

19 ± 5.5

13 ± 2.9

85 ± 10.4

12 ± 0.6

23 ± 5.3

500 P

18 ± 3.5

16 ± 7.0

81 ± 8.5

11 ± 1.7

28 ± 3.6

1500 P

19 ± 2.3

18 ± 3.1

87 ± 5.3

10 ± 0.6

30 ± 5.3

5000 P

21 ± 3.2

16 ± 4.4

87 ± 20.9

11 ± 2.3

30 ± 1.2

Positive controls (µg/plate)

4NQO
(0.2)

9AA
(80)

ENNG
(3)

ENNG
(5)

ENNG
(2)

Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 plates)

185 ± 5.6

260 ± 64.7

639 ± 44.4

723 ± 101.3

880 ± 24.9

+

Solvent control (DMSO)

26 ± 3.0

18 ± 5.6

90 ± 12.9

13 ± 2.3

50 ± 7.5

15

26 ± 2.6

18 ± 6.5

88 ± 16.8

11 ± 4.9

51 ± 8.5

50

29 ± 3.1

18 ± 3.5

97 ± 14.0

9 ± 1.0

48 ± 9.1

150

21 ± 4.4

20 ± 4.6

86 ± 5.0

12 ± 4.6

46 ± 8.1

500 P

27 ± 5.6

16 ± 3.6

94 ± 8.0

11 ± 0.0

47 ± 7.2

1500 P

22 ± 3.0

16 ± 4.0

88 ± 7.4

11 ± 1.5

46 ± 5.9

5000 P

23 ± 6.0

18 ± 4.2

89 ± 10.6

10 ± 0.6

40 ± 2.6

Positive controls 

(µg/plate)

B(a)P
(5)

2AA
(2)

2AA
(1)

2AA
(2)

2AA
(10)

Mean No. of colonies/plate (average of 3 plates)

128 ± 10.5

284 ± 19.3

1041 ± 141.0

296 ± 9.7

173 ± 18.0

2AA = 2-aminoanthracene

4NQO = 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide

9AA = 9-aminoacridine

B(a)P = benzo(a)pyrene

ENNG = N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine

Table 3: Historical control values (2016)

 

S9-Mix

Mean number of revertant colonies per plate

[mean ± SD]

TA 100

TA 1535

WP2

uvr A

TA 98

TA 1537

Negative/ vehicle controls
(combined)

-

90 ± 14.5

15 ± 4.5

22 ± 5.8

21 ± 4.8

12 ± 3.5

+

93 ± 14.3

15 ± 5.2

27 ± 6.3

25 ± 5.7

13 ± 3.5

Positive controls

-

724 ± 320.4

854 ± 664.9

718 ± 338.6

186 ± 49.8

406 ± 227.0

+

1264 ± 562.6

240 ± 62.1

240 ± 98.2

188 ± 230.8

290 ± 92.7

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Based on the results of the conducted study, the test substance did not exhibit mutagenic properties in bacterial cells.