Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Exposure related observations in humans: other data

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
exposure-related observations in humans: other data
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1979

Materials and methods

Type of study / information:
Single exposure, Inhalation, controlled exposure, Irritation
CNS effects
Endpoint addressed:
eye irritation
neurotoxicity
other: CNS effects
Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
nine volunteers (students) were exposed to 0, 204, 600, 1200 and 2400 mg/m3 (0, 34, 100, 200 and 400 ppm) and six students and nine painters were exposed to 0, 300 and 600 mg/m3 (0, 50 and 100 ppm) for a duration of 7 h to white spirit vapour (17% aromatics).
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Stoddard solvent
EC Number:
232-489-3
EC Name:
Stoddard solvent
Cas Number:
8052-41-3
Molecular formula:
C10H22
IUPAC Name:
stoddard solvent
Test material form:
liquid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Stoddard solvent vapour (17% aromatics).

Method

Ethical approval:
confirmed, but no further information available
Details on study design:
nine volunteers (students) were exposed to 0, 204, 600, 1200 and 2400 mg/m3 (0, 34, 100, 200 and 400 ppm) and six students and nine painters were exposed to 0, 300 and 600 mg/m3 (0, 50 and 100 ppm) for a duration of 7 h to white spirit vapour (17% aromatics).
Exposure assessment:
measured
Details on exposure:
nine volunteers (students) were exposed to 0, 204, 600, 1200 and 2400 mg/m3 (0, 34, 100, 200 and 400 ppm) and six students and nine painters were exposed to 0, 300 and 600 mg/m3 (0, 50 and 100 ppm) for a duration of 7 h to white spirit vapour (17% aromatics).

Results and discussion

Results:
The reporting of eye irritation was the most sensitive measure of effect. There was a significant dose-response relationship in the house painter group and in one group of students exposed up to 2400 mg/m3; there was a higher sensitivity in the house painters. Among students, a dose-related increase in irritation of the nose was noted from 600 to 2400 mg/m3.
In the study was found dose-related increased incidences of headache, tiredness and giddiness among nine students exposed up to 2400 mg/m3 (400 ppm).

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The reporting of eye irritation was the most sensitive measure of effect. There was a significant dose-response relationship in the house painter group and in one group of students exposed up to 2400 mg/m3; there was a higher sensitivity in the house painters. Among students, a dose-related increase in irritation of the nose was noted from 600 to 2400 mg/m3.
In the study was found dose-related increased incidences of headache, tiredness and giddiness among nine students exposed up to 2400 mg/m3 (400 ppm).