Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Remarks:
GLP guideline study; study report available

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
other: J-CHECK
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2020
Report date:
2020
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2000
Report date:
2000
Reference Type:
other: recalculation
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2020
Report date:
2020

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Version / remarks:
1984
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Diethylamine
EC Number:
203-716-3
EC Name:
Diethylamine
Cas Number:
109-89-7
Molecular formula:
C4H11N
IUPAC Name:
N-ethylethanamine
Test material form:
liquid
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Lot number of test material: B34683L
- Purity test date: >= 99%

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: at room temperature, in the dark
- Stability under storage conditions: Infrared absorption spectrum, NMR spectrum measurement and high-performance liquid chromatograph analysis were performed on the obtained test substance, and it was confirmed that no contradiction was found with the structure of the test substance and the purity was confirmed. At the end of the test, the same measurement and analysis was performed, and when compared with the measurement and analysis results before the start of the test, no difference was found. Therefore, it was determined that the test substance was stable during storage in the sample storage in the research department.

OTHER SPECIFICS
- appearance: colorless, transparent liquid

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
At the start of exposure:
- 0.5 mL of test solution from each test container were collected and filled into a vial.
- 500 μL 2,4-Dinitrofluorobenzene (100 mmoL acetonitrile solution) and 100 μL sodium hydroxide (0.1N) were added and the solution was left at room temperature for 30 minutes or more to UV label the test substance.
- The samples were than analysed in an HPLC autosampler.
At the end of exposure:
- 1.0 - 2.0 mL of test solution from each test container were collected, centrifuged and the supernatant was filled into a vial.
- 500 μL 2,4-Dinitrofluorobenzene (100 mmoL acetonitrile solution) and 100 μL sodium hydroxide (0.1N) were added and the solution was left at room temperature for 30 minutes or more to UV label the test substance.
- The samples were than analysed in an HPLC autosampler.

Test solutions

Vehicle:
no

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata (previous names: Raphidocelis subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name:
- Strain: ATCC 22662
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): obtained from American Type Culture Collection

ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: 3 days
- Culturing media and conditions (same as test or not): same as test
- Any deformed or abnormal cells observed: no deformation or abnormal cells were observed

Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h

Test conditions

Test temperature:
23 +-2 °C
measured temperature in the incubation chamber: 22.0 °C (0h), 22.8 °C (24 h), 23.0 °C (48 h), 23.1 °C (72 h); 22.7 °C (average)
pH:
pH values measured in
Control: 7.4 (0h), 7.2 (72h)
Treatments: 7.4 - 10.0 (0h), 7.4 - 8.2 (72h)
For details see 'Any other information on results incl. tables'
Nominal and measured concentrations:
nominal: 4.8, 8.6, 15.4, 27.8, 50.0 and 90.0 mg/L
measured: 0 h: 4.0, 7.4, 14.8, 26.8, 45.3 and 87.3 mg/L (83.3 to 97.0% of nominal)
72 h: 2.1, 4.1, 7.5, 13.3, 24.0 and 46.0 mg/L (43.8 to 51.1% of nominal)
Therefore the geomean concentrations were used to recalculate the ECx values (BASF SE, 2020)
Geomean concentrations: 2.9, 5.5, 10.5, 18.9, 33.0 and 63.4 mg/L
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Fill volume: 100 mL
- Aeration: no
- Initial cells density: 1*10^4 cells/ml
- Control end cells density: 194.6*10^4 cells/ml
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 3

TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: standard medium (OECD medium)

OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: yes
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 24 h
- Light intensity and quality: 4000 - 5000 lux

EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) : cell density: measured daily; pH values of the test solutions: measured at the beginning and at the end of the test; temperature and light intensity: measured daily
Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
potassium dichromate

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC10
Effect conc.:
34.3 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: 95% CL: 32.0 - 36.3 mg/L
Remarks:
recalculated with ToxRat v3.3
Key result
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
50.9 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (geom. mean)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: 95% CL: 49.3 - 52.4 mg/L
Remarks:
recalculated with ToxRat v3.3
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
11 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (not specified)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
result from JCHECK, NITE homepage; June 2019
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
54 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (not specified)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
result from JCHECK, NITE homepage, June 2019
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
50 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other:
Remarks:
result from study report; sectional growth rate (24 - 72h)
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EC50
Effect conc.:
75.3 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: 95% CL: 69.5 - 82.5 mg/L
Remarks:
result from study report; sectional growth rate (24 - 72h)
Results with reference substance (positive control):
- 72-h EbC50: 0.52 mg/L

Any other information on results incl. tables

The data of the original report were re-evaluated using ToxRat v3.3 in order to obtain an EC10, which is originally not reported. According to REACH Guidance document chapter R.10 Table R.10-1 (Overview of toxicity test endpoints and guidance on derivation of L(E)C50 and NOEC values) an EC10 for a long-term test which is obtained using an appropriate statistical method (usually regression analysis) will be used preferentially.

There has been a recommendation within OECD in 1996 to phase out the use of the NOEC, in particular as it can correspond to large and potentially biologically important magnitudes of effect. The advantage of regression method for the estimation of ECx is that information from the whole concentration-effect relationship is taken into account and that confidence intervals can be calculated. These methods result in an ECx, where x is a low effect percentile (e.g. 5-20%). It makes results from different experiments more comparable than NOECs.  For the re-evaluation, geomean concentrations were calculated.

Result tables from original study report

Table 1: Measured concentrations of Diethylamine during a 72 -h exposure of Selenastrum capricornutum with calculated geomean concentrations (added by BASF SE, 2020)

Nominal concentration [mg/L]

Measured concentration – 0 h (% of nominal) [mg/L]

Measured concentration – 72 h (% of nominal) [mg/L]

Geomean Concentration [mg/L]

Control

< 0.04

< 0.04

0

4.8

4.0 (83.3)

2.1 (43.8)

2.9

8.6

7.4 (86.0)

4.1 (47.7)

5.5

15.4

14.8 (96.1)

7.5 (48.7)

10.5

27.8

26.8 (96.4)

13.3 (47.8)

18.9

50.0

45.3 (90.6)

24.0 (48.0)

33.0

90.0

87.3 (97.0)

46.0 (51.1)

63.4

Table 2: Cell densitiy of Selenastrum capricornutum

Nominal concentration [mg/L]

No.

Cell Density (a) – 0 h

Cell Density (a) – 24 h

Cell Density (a) – 48 h

Cell Density (a) – 72h

Control

1

1.0

5.8

38.7

193.3

 

2

1.0

5.3

41.8

198.2

 

3

1.0

6.1

39.6

192.4

 

Average

1.0

5.7

40.0

194.6

 

S.D.

0.0

0.41

1.59

3.09

4.8

1

1.0

4.9

34.4

179.7

 

2

1.0

4.6

38.2

190.5

 

3

1.0

5.5

39.2

202.8

 

Average

1.0

5.0

37.3

191.0

 

S.D.

0.0

0.49

2.52

11.54

8.6

1

1.0

5.1

36.5

198.6

 

2

1.0

5.4

38.2

189.6

 

3

1.0

5.7

37.8

184.4

 

Average

1.0

5.4

37.5

190.9

 

S.D.

0.0

0.28

0.86

7.20

15.4

1

1.0

5.4

36.3

200.0

 

2

1.0

5.2

35.4

188.4

 

3

1.0

4.9

35.3

182.4

 

Average

1.0

5.2

35.7

190.3

 

S.D.

0.0

0.24

0.55

8.94

27.8

1

1.0

4.7

39.6

152.2

 

2

1.0

5.6

38.7

147.1

 

3

1.0

4.9

37.8

146.1

 

Average

1.0

5.0

38.7

148.5

 

S.D.

0.0

0.46

0.91

3.26

50.0

1

1.0

4.1

28.4

129.4

 

2

1.0

3.8

29.9

132.9

 

3

1.0

3.8

30.1

124.4

 

Average

1.0

3.9

29.5

128.9

 

S.D.

0.0

0.21

0.89

4.24

90.0

1

1.0

1.5

3.1

4.0

 

2

1.0

1.5

2.6

2.8

 

3

1.0

1.9

3.1

3.8

 

Average

1.0

1.6

2.9

3.5

 

S.D.

0.0

0.23

0.30

0.65

Each value represents the mean of three sample counts

(a) Cell density x 10^4 cells/ml)

Table 3: pH values at 0 -hour and 72 -hour exposure

Nominal concentration [mg/L]

pH – 0 h

pH – 72 h

Control

7.4

7.2

4.8

7.4

7.4

8.6

7.5

7.5

15.4

7.7

7.7

27.8

8.3

7.8

50.0

9.4

8.0

90.0

10.0

8.2

Applicant's summary and conclusion