Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
04 - 18 Feb 1976
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions (no experimental 48 h reading performed, only 72 hours observationperiod, 24 hours occlusive application, analytical purity of test substance not specified, limited documentation available).
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
occlusive dressing, 24 instead of 4 h exposure, no experimental 48 h reading performed, limited documentation, analytical purity of test substance not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: FHSA
GLP compliance:
not specified
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Albino
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
other: shaved and abraded
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: not required, untreated sites of the same animal served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL
- Concentration (if solution): undiluted
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 hours
Observation period:
72 hours (as all signs of irritation were fully reversible)
Reading time points: 24 and 72 h
Number of animals:
6
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: back skin, 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm
- Type of wrap if used: clear plastic trunk bands

SCORING SYSTEM: according to Draize

The animals were immobilized during the 24 hour exposure period.
Upon removal of the patches the resulting reactions were evaluated on the basis weighted scores. Evaluations were again made after 72 hours.
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.22
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Remarks on result:
other: no 48 h data are available; for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 24 h over 48 h)
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: no 48 h data are available; for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 24 h over 48 h)
Other effects:
The skin scores upon treatment of abraded skin were similar to intact skin.

Table 1: Results of skin irritation study

Observation time

Rabbit no.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

24 h

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

48 h

No experimental data available; for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to bet he same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption)

72 h

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

 

Table 2: Calculation of mean scores

Rabbit no.

1

2

3

4

5

6

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Erythema

Edema

Mean value 24 + 48 + 72 h

0.00

0.00

0.67

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.00

0.67

0.00

*No 48 h data are available: for calculation of mean scores, the 48 h values were assumed to be the same as those at 24 h (worst case assumption: persistence of effects seen at 24 h over 48 h). 

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
04 - 07 Jan 2002
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-guideline study with acceptable restrictions (analytical purity of test substance was not specified).
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
analytical purity of test substance not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
analytical purity of test substance not specified
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
The Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Percival Ltd, UK
- Age at study initiation: 12 - 16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.0 - 3.5 kg
- Housing: individually in suspended matal cages
- Diet: ad libitum, certified rabbit diet (Code 5322, PMI Nutrition)
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 - 23
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Preparation of test site:
shaved
Vehicle:
not specified
Controls:
other: not required, untreated sites of the same animal served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.5 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 h
Observation period:
72 h
Reading time points: 24, 48 and 72 hours
Number of animals:
3
Details on study design:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm
- Type of wrap if used: cotton gauze patch secured in position with surgical adhesive patch


REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: with cotton soaked in 74% industrial methylated spirits
- Time after start of exposure: 4 h

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48h
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.66
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72h
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.66
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72h
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48h
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48h
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48h
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Well-defined erythema was noted at all treated skin sites one hour after patch removal regressing to very slight erythema at all treated skin sites at the 24 h observation and two treated skin sites at the 48 h observation.
Slight edema was noted at all treated skin sites one hour after patch removal regressing to very slight erythema at all treated skin sites at the 24 h observation. One treated skin site appeared normal at the 48 h observation and the two remaining treated skin sites appeared normal at 72 h.

Erythema Score

Animal Number

24 h

48 h

72 h

1

1

0

0

2

1

1

0

3

1

1

0

 

Edema Score

Animal Number

24 h

48 h

72 h

1

1

0

0

2

1

0

0

3

1

0

0

 

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH

1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
The target substance FATTY ACIDS, COCO, ISO-BU ESTERS (CAS 91697-43-7) and the source substance FATTY ACIDS, C16-18, ISOBUTYL ESTERS (CAS 85865-69-6) are both Short Chain Alcohol Esters (SCAE C2-C8) composed by a fatty acid (C16-C18) and a C4 alcohol (isobutanol).
The source and the target substance show therefore the same reactive groups and a similar composition. A read-across to the source is therefore justified.

2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Both target and source substances are fatty acid esters produced by chemical reaction of an alcohol (isobutanol) with organic acids (e. g. stearic acid) in the presence of an acid catalyst. The esterification reaction is started by a transfer of a proton from the acid catalyst to the acid to form an alkyloxonium ion. The carboxylic acid is protonated on its carbonyl oxygen followed by a nucleophilic addition of a molecule of the alcohol to a carbonyl carbon of acid. An intermediate product is formed. This intermediate product loses a water molecule and proton to give an ester. Monoesters are the final product of esterification.

3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
Since both target and source substances are fatty acid esters produced by chemical reaction of an alcohol (isobutanol) with an organic acid and therefore share similar/overlapping structural features and functional groups, it is justified to use a read across approach. The source substance has been registered already and its skin irritation potential has been investigated using a grouping of substance and read across approach. Based on the results of the available animal studies as well as according to the results on human skin, none of the substances within the fatty acid C2-8 ester category is considered skin irritating. Therefore, based on a weight of evidence approach, no classification for skin irritation for all substances within the fatty acid C2-8 esters category is required.
The same behaviour is predicted for the target substance FATTY ACIDS, COCO, ISO-BU ESTERS (CAS 91697-43-7) .
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across: supporting information
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.4 (Acute Toxicity: Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.66
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.66
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72 h
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Well-defined erythema was noted at all treated skin sites one hour after patch removal regressing to very slight erythema at all treated skin sites at the 24 h observation and two treated skin sites at the 48 h observation.
Slight edema was noted at all treated skin sites one hour after patch removal regressing to very slight erythema at all treated skin sites at the 24 h observation. One treated skin site appeared normal at the 48 h observation and the two remaining treated skin sites appeared normal at 72 h.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The source substance has been registered already and its oral acute toxicity has been investigated using a grouping of substance and read across approach. Based on the results of the available animal studies as well as according to the results on human skin, none of the substances within the fatty acid C2-8 ester category is considered skin irritating. Therefore, based on a weight of evidence approach, no classification for skin irritation for all substances within the fatty acid C2-8 esters category is required.
The same behaviour is predicted for the target substance FATTY ACIDS, COCO, ISO-BU ESTERS (CAS 91697-43-7) .
Executive summary:

The target substance FATTY ACIDS, COCO, ISO-BU ESTERS (CAS 91697-43-7) and the source substance FATTY ACIDS, C16-18, ISOBUTYL ESTERS (CAS 85865-69-6) are both Short Chain Alcohol Esters (SCAE C2-C8) composed by a fatty acid (C16-C18) and a C4 alcohol (isobutanol).

The source and the target substance show therefore the same reactive groups and a similar composition. A read-across to the source is therefore justified.

The source substance has been registered already and its oral acute toxicity has been investigated using a grouping of substance and read across approach. Based on the results of the available animal studies as well as according to the results on human skin, none of the substances within the fatty acid C2-8 ester category is considered skin irritating. Therefore, based on a weight of evidence approach, no classification for skin irritation for all substances within the fatty acid C2-8 esters category is required.

The same behaviour is predicted for the target substance FATTY ACIDS, COCO, ISO-BU ESTERS (CAS 91697-43-7) .

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
04 - 18 Feb 1976
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Comparable to guideline study with acceptable restrictions. (analytical purity of test substance not specified, limited documentation).
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
analytical purity of test substance not given, limited documentation available
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: FHSA
GLP compliance:
no
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Albino
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
no
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL



Duration of treatment / exposure:
single instillation
Observation period (in vivo):
7 days (as all irritation reactions were reversible within 72 hours)

Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): No

SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: slit lamp examinations / 2% fluorescein
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.275
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 72h
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: Reversibility: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
The test substance showed only slight conjunctival irritating effects (score 1) only at the 24 hour reading in 5 of 6 animals when instilled with 0.1 mL in rabbit eyes. The slight conjunctival irritating effect was already completely reversed after 48 hours in all animals.
Other effects:
none
Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Study period:
14 - 16 Jan 2002
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: GLP-guideline study with acceptable restrictions (analytical purity of test substance not specified).
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
analytical purity of test substance not specified
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
analytical purity of test substance not specified
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Remarks:
The Department of Health of the Government of the United Kingdom
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: David Percival Ltd, UK
- Age at study initiation: 12-16 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.0 - 3.5 kg
- Housing: single accomodation in suspended metal cages
- Diet: ad libitum, Certified rabbit diea (Code 5322), PMI Nutrition International, UK
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 17 - 23
- Humidity (%): 30 - 70
- Air changes (per hr): 15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12

Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
other: the untreated eye served as control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.1 mL

Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h
Observation period (in vivo):
72 h
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
3
Details on study design:
SCORING SYSTEM: according to Draize scale for scoring ocular lesions.
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
mean out of all 3 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
out of all 3 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: reversibility: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Minimal to moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment with minimal conjunctival irritation in two treated eyes at the 24-hour observation. One treated eye appeared normal at the 24-hour observation and the two remaining treated eyes appeared normal at the 48-hour observation.
Other effects:
One animal showed slight discharge at 24 hours.

Table 1: Individual Irritation Scores:

Animal Number

Hours after application

1

24

48

72

A

B

C

D

A

B

C

D

A

B

C

D

A

B

C

D

1

0

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

2

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

2

1

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

A = Cornea Score

B = Iris Score

C = Conjunctiva Score

D = Chemosis Score

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Justification for type of information:
REPORTING FORMAT FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH

1. HYPOTHESIS FOR THE ANALOGUE APPROACH
The target substance FATTY ACIDS, COCO, ISO-BU ESTERS (CAS 91697-43-7) and the source substance FATTY ACIDS, C16-18, ISOBUTYL ESTERS (CAS 85865-69-6) are both Short Chain Alcohol Esters (SCAE C2-C8) composed by a fatty acid (C16-C18) and a C4 alcohol (isobutanol).
The source and the target substance show therefore the same reactive groups and a similar composition. A read-across to the source is therefore justified.

2. SOURCE AND TARGET CHEMICAL(S) (INCLUDING INFORMATION ON PURITY AND IMPURITIES)
Both target and source substances are fatty acid esters produced by chemical reaction of an alcohol (isobutanol) with organic acids (e. g. stearic acid) in the presence of an acid catalyst. The esterification reaction is started by a transfer of a proton from the acid catalyst to the acid to form an alkyloxonium ion. The carboxylic acid is protonated on its carbonyl oxygen followed by a nucleophilic addition of a molecule of the alcohol to a carbonyl carbon of acid. An intermediate product is formed. This intermediate product loses a water molecule and proton to give an ester. Monoesters are the final product of esterification.

3. ANALOGUE APPROACH JUSTIFICATION
Since both target and source substances are fatty acid esters produced by chemical reaction of an alcohol (isobutanol) with an organic acid and therefore share similar/overlapping structural features and functional groups, it is justified to use a read across approach. The source substance has been registered already and its eye irritation potential has been investigated using a grouping of substance and read across approach. Several acute eye irritation studies have been performed in rabbits in vivo. None of the tested fatty acid esters showed an eye irritation potential. Therefore, based on a weight of evidence approach, no classification for eye irritation for all substance s within the fatty acid C2-C8 esters category is required.
The same behaviour is predicted for the target substance FATTY ACIDS, COCO, ISO-BU ESTERS (CAS 91697-43-7) .
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across source
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
read-across: supporting information
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.33
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
Minimal to moderate conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment with minimal conjunctival irritation in two treated eyes at the 24-hour observation. One treated eye appeared normal at the 24-hour observation and the two remaining treated eyes appeared normal at the 48-hour observation.
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The source substance has been registered already and its eye irritation potential has been investigated using a grouping of substance and read across approach. Several acute eye irritation studies have been performed in rabbits in vivo. None of the tested fatty acid esters showed an eye irritation potential. Therefore, based on a weight of evidence approach, no classification for eye irritation for all substance s within the fatty acid C2-C8 esters category is required.
The same behaviour is predicted for the target substance FATTY ACIDS, COCO, ISO-BU ESTERS (CAS 91697-43-7) .
Executive summary:

The target substance FATTY ACIDS, COCO, ISO-BU ESTERS (CAS 91697-43-7) and the source substance FATTY ACIDS, C16-18, ISOBUTYL ESTERS (CAS 85865-69-6) are both Short Chain Alcohol Esters (SCAE C2-C8) composed by a fatty acid (C16-C18) and a C4 alcohol (isobutanol).

The source and the target substance show therefore the same reactive groups and a similar composition. A read-across to the source is therefore justified.

The source substance has been registered already and its eye irritation potential has been investigated using a grouping of substance and read across approach. Several acute eye irritation studies have been performed in rabbits in vivo. None of the tested fatty acid esters showed an eye irritation potential. Therefore, based on a weight of evidence approach, no classification for eye irritation for all substance s within the fatty acid C2-C8 esters category is required.

The same behaviour is predicted for the target substance FATTY ACIDS, COCO, ISO-BU ESTERS (CAS 91697-43-7) .

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
Data waiving:
study scientifically not necessary / other information available
Justification for data waiving:
an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Justification for classification or non-classification