Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
direct observations: clinical cases, poisoning incidents and other
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
disregarded due to major methodological deficiencies
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: unassignable study, only summary available

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Evaluation of an occupational respiratory exposure to a zirconium containing dust.
Author:
Hadjimichael O.C. and Brubaker R.E.
Year:
1981
Bibliographic source:
J Occup Med. 23: 543-547

Materials and methods

Study type:
study with volunteers
Principles of method if other than guideline:
A group of handfinishers of zirconium metal reactor components questioned whether the dust to which they were exposed would cause chronic lung disease or cancer, or both. To investigate this possibility, the work environment was surveyed, and 32 male employees who had worked as handfinishers from one to seventeen years, were compared to a group of controls in reference to a respiratory questionnaire, chest x-ray findings, and expiratory lung function tests.
GLP compliance:
not specified

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Zirconium compounds
IUPAC Name:
Zirconium compounds
Details on test material:
Zirconium containing dust, without any precision

Method

Type of population:
occupational
Subjects:
32 male employees
Reason of exposure:
unintentional, occupational
Details on exposure:
employees had worked as handfinishers from one to seventeen years
Examinations:
Respiratory questionnaire, chest x-ray findings, and expiratory lung function tests.
The controls were matched to the handfinishers for age, sex, payroll status and smoking history

Results and discussion

Clinical signs:
No significant differences were found between the exposed and the control groups.
Results of examinations:
No significant differences were found between the exposed and the control groups.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
No significant differences were found between the exposed and the control groups.