Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 482-160-5 | CAS number: 130786-09-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Acute Toxicity: inhalation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 18-04-2019 to 08-05-2019
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study performed under GLP. All relevant validity criteria were met.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 019
- Report date:
- 2019
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
- Version / remarks:
- 2009
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Clinical observation and body weight were performed for the 1 mg/L exposure group on Day 8 and for the 5 mg/L exposure group on Day 2 but a day later.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.1300 (Acute inhalation toxicity)
- Version / remarks:
- August 1998
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Clinical observation and body weight were performed for the 1 mg/L exposure group on Day 8 and for the 5 mg/L exposure group on Day 2 but a day later
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.2 (Acute Toxicity (Inhalation))
- Version / remarks:
- May 2008
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Clinical observation and body weight were performed for the 1 mg/L exposure group on Day 8 and for the 5 mg/L exposure group on Day 2 but a day later
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Appendix to Director General Notification, No. 12-Nousan-8147. Agricultural Production Bureau, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (JMAFF).
- Version / remarks:
- 2000
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Clinical observation and body weight were performed for the 1 mg/L exposure group on Day 8 and for the 5 mg/L exposure group on Day 2 but a day later
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test type:
- traditional method
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 482-160-5
- EC Name:
- -
- Cas Number:
- 130786-09-3
- Molecular formula:
- C12H13N
- IUPAC Name:
- (2Z)-2-phenylhex-2-enenitrile
- Test material form:
- liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Physical state: liquid
- Storage condition of test material: In refrigerator (2-8°C) protected from light, container flushed with nitrogen
- Other: colourless to very pale yellow liquid
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Remarks:
- Crl: WI(Han)
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Recognised supplier
- Females (if applicable) nulliparous and non-pregnant: [yes/no]: Yes - Age at study initiation: Approximately 9-10 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation:Males: 248 to 305 g. Females: 169 to 210 g.
- Fasting period before study: - Housing:On arrival and following assignment to the study, animals were group housed (up to 5 animals of the same sex and same exposure group together) in polycarbonate cages (Makrolon MIV type; height 18 cm.) containing sterilized sawdust as bedding material (Lignocel S 8-15, JRS - J.Rettenmaier & Söhne GmbH + CO. KG, Rosenberg, Germany) equipped with water bottles.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):Pelleted rodent diet (SM R/M-Z from SSNIFF® Spezialdiäten GmbH, Soest, Germany) was provided ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Municipal tap-water was freely available to each animal via water bottles.
- Acclimation period: 5 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS - Temperature (°C): 20 to 21°C
- Humidity (%): 47 to 51%
- Air changes (per hr): Ten or greater air changes per hour with 100% fresh air (no air recirculation)
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): A 12-hour light/12-hour dark cycle
IN-LIFE DATES: From: To: Not stated
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- inhalation: aerosol
- Type of inhalation exposure:
- nose only
- Vehicle:
- not specified
- Mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD):
- >= 3.4 - <= 3.9 µm
- Geometric standard deviation (GSD):
- >= 1.9 - <= 2
- Remark on MMAD/GSD:
- At 1 mg/L, the Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) was 3.4 μm (geometric standard deviation (gsd) 2.0) and 3.4 μm (gsd 1.9). At 5 mg/L, the MMAD was 3.9 μm (gsd 2.0) and 3.6 μm (gsd 1.9).
- Details on inhalation exposure:
- GENERATION OF TEST ATMOSPHERE / CHAMBER DESCRIPTION
- Exposure apparatus: Nose only exposure apparatus.
- Exposure chamber volume: The number of animal sections and number of open inlets were adapted to the air flow in such a way that at each animal port the theoretical air flow was at least 1 L/min. The main inlet of the test atmosphere was located at the top section and the main outlet was located at the bottom section. The direction of the flow of the test atmosphere guaranteed a freshly generated atmosphere for each individual animal.
- Method of holding animals in test chamber: Each animal port has its own test atmosphere inlet and exhaust outlet.
- Source and rate of air: The mean total airflows were 66 and 24 L/min for the 1 mg/L and 5 mg/L exposure groups, respectively.
- Method of conditioning air: It was considered that the opacity of the test atmosphere could not be reliably monitored by means of an aerosol monitoring system. An indication of stability of the test atmosphere was obtained from the concentration measurements equally distributed over time.
- System of generating particulates/aerosols: Metal concentric jet nebulizer located at the top of the exposure chamber.
- Method of particle size determination: The particle size distribution was characterized twice during each exposure period. The samples were drawn with a flow of 2 L/min. from the test atmosphere through a tube mounted in one of the free animal ports of the exposure chamber. The samples were collected with an 8 stage Marple personal cascade impactor containing fiber glass filters (TE- 290-GF. Tisch Environmental, Cleves, Ohio, USA) and a fiber glass back-up filter (SEC-290- F1, Westech, Upper Stondon, Bedfordshire, England). Amounts of test item collected were measured gravimetrically. Subsequently the Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) and the Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD) were determined based on OECD guidance document No 39. Graphs of the cumulative mass of test item collected (percentage of total collected) against the cut points of the impactor stages were drawn on log-normal paper. When drawing the graphs more weight was given to the cut points where the cumulative mass sampled was within the range of 5 to 95%. The Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD), i.e. the particle size where 50% of the particle mass was borne by particles smaller than the MMAD and the sigma-84%, (the particle size where 84% of the particle mass was borne by particles smaller than the MMAD was read from the graph. The geometric standard deviation (gsd) was calculated as sigma-84% / MMAD. The performance characteristics of the test atmosphere generation and exposure system to be used was assessed during trial generations. These trials were performed according to test facilities SOP’s and since these trials were performed prior to preparation of the study plan no GLP was claimed for these trials. This was considered as no exception of the GLP guidelines since the measurements and observations were not used for interpretation for the outcome of this study. For the same reason, these results are not reported and kept in the raw data of this study. These investigations were undertaken to establish:
Aerosol concentration assessment
Temporal variation in chamber concentration
Test item utilization
Particle size distribution measurements (within the target MMAD range 1-4 μm)
Trial generation results showed that the test item was not volatile and the test atmosphere consisted mainly of aerosol with a negligibly small (if any) vapor part.
- Treatment of exhaust air: The extract from the exposure chamber passed through a ‘scrubber’ trap and was connected with a high efficiency filter to a metered exhaust system. - Temperature, humidity, pressure in air chamber: The temperature and relative humidity were measured with a humidity and temperature indicator (E+E Elektronik, Engerwitzdorf, Austria) and recorded after the animals were connected to the exposure chamber and at 30 minute intervals after initiation of exposure. The probe was inserted in a tube mounted in one of the free animal ports of the exposure chamber. The temperature of the atmosphere during the exposures was between 21.1 and 21.6oC. The relative humidity was between 4 and 46% which was considered appropriate for this relatively short 4 hours exposure duration.
TEST ATMOSPHERE
- Brief description of analytical method used: A total of 15 and 19 representative samples were taken for determination of the actual concentration during exposure at 1 and 5 mg/L, respectively. Samples were drawn from the test atmosphere through a tube mounted in one of the free animal ports of the exposure chamber. Samples were drawn through a glass fiber filter (type APFC04700, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). Sample volumes were measured by means of a dry gas meter (type G 1.6, Actaris Meterfabriek B.V., Dordrecht, The Netherlands). The collected amount of test item in the air sample was measured gravimetrically. Subsequently the time-weighted mean concentrations with the standard deviations were calculated.
- Samples taken from breathing zone: yes
VEHICLE
- Composition of vehicle (if applicable): n/a
- Concentration of test material in vehicle (if applicable): n/a
- Justification of choice of vehicle: n/a
- Lot/batch no. (if required): n/a
- Purity: n/a
TEST ATMOSPHERE (if not tabulated)
- Particle size distribution: Tabulated
- MMAD (Mass median aerodynamic diameter) / GSD (Geometric st. dev.): Tabulated
CLASS METHOD (if applicable): n/a
- Rationale for the selection of the starting concentration: - Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
- no
- Remarks:
- t was considered that the opacity of the test atmosphere could not be reliably monitored by meansofanaerosolmonitoringsystem. Anindicationofstabilityofthetestatmospherewas obtained from the concentration measurements equally distributed over time.
- Remarks on duration:
- 4 hours
- Concentrations:
- 1 mg/L and 5 mg/L
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5
- Control animals:
- no
- Details on study design:
- The test item was administered once via the inhalation route on Day 1, by nose only directed flow exposure for four hours.
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Animals were checked for mortality, behavioral signs of distress and effects on respiration at least three times during exposure. Post exposure observations were performed at periodic intervals on the day of exposure (at least two times) and once daily thereafter, except for Day 2 (5 mg/L exposure group) and Day 8 (1 mg/L exposure group), see deviations in Appendix 3. The observation period was 14 days. All the animals were examined for reaction to exposure. The onset, intensity and duration of these signs was recorded (if appropriate), particular attention being paid to the animals for the first hours after exposure. Animals were weighed individually on Day 1 (pre exposure), 2 (Day 3 for the 5 mg/L exposure group), 4 and 8 (Day 9 for the 1 mg/L exposure group) and 15
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight,organ weights, histopathology: yes - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was carried out in the study.
Results and discussion
Effect levelsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- > 1 - <= 5 other: mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Dose descriptor:
- LC50
- Effect level:
- >= 5 other: mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Exp. duration:
- 4 h
- Mortality:
- At 5 mg/L, two females were found dead and one female was killed in extremis on Day 3.
- Clinical signs:
- other:
- Body weight:
- At 1 mg/L, overall body weight gain in males and females was within the range expected for rats of this strain and age used in this type of study and were therefore considered not indicative of toxicity.
At 5 mg/L, body weight loss was within the range expected for rats of this strain and age used in this type of study. The regaining of weight during the study was slightly delayed compared to what is normally seen in this type of study. - Gross pathology:
- At 1 mg/L, no abnormalities were found at macroscopic post mortem examination of the animals.
At 5 mg/L macroscopic post mortem examination revealed abnormalities of the thymus (dark red/black-brown foci and/or pale/black-brown discoloration), jejunum, ileum, caecum and colon (contents black-brown discoloration), liver (pale discoloration) and/or spleen (reduced in size) for animals that died or were sacrificed in moribund condition during the study. Macroscopic examination of the other animals revealed abnormalities of the thymus (right side and general many dark red foci) for two males. The remaining animals did not reveal any abnormalities at termination.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table. 1. Gravimetrical Concentration of test Item.
Time (hh:mm) |
Action |
Sample Volume (L) |
Mass Sampled (mg) |
Concentration (mg/L) |
% of total exposure time |
Weight Concentration (mg/L) |
8.52 |
Start of Generation |
n.a. |
n.a. |
n.a. |
0.0 |
n.a. |
8.56 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
8.12 |
1.624 |
1.7 |
0.027 |
9.02 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
7.56 |
1.512 |
2.5 |
0.038 |
9.08 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
7.16 |
1.432 |
2.1 |
0.036 |
9.13 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
5.50 |
1.100 |
2.9 |
0.023 |
9.20 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
5.43 |
1.086 |
6.7 |
0.032 |
9.36 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
5.63 |
1.126 |
7.9 |
0.075 |
9.55 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
5.59 |
1.118 |
8.3 |
0.089 |
10.15 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
5.54 |
1.108 |
12.1 |
0.092 |
10.44 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
5.20 |
1.040 |
9.2 |
0.026 |
11.06 |
Start of sampling |
6 |
6.63 |
1.105 |
7.9 |
0.101 |
11.25 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
5.44 |
1.088 |
8.2 |
0.086 |
11.45 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
5.33 |
1.066 |
8.3 |
0.089 |
12.06 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
5.52 |
1.104 |
8.8 |
0.097 |
12.26 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
5.38 |
1.076 |
8.3 |
0.090 |
12.45 |
Start of sampling |
5 |
5.62 |
1.124 |
7.9 |
0.089 |
12.52 |
End of Generation |
n.a. |
n.a. |
1.124 I) |
2.9 |
0.033 |
Time-weighted mean concentration |
1.121 |
|||||
Standard deviation |
0.033 |
|||||
Number of samples |
15 |
1) Assumed concentration, based on the last sample. n.a.= not applicable
Test Atmosphere Characterization Concentration:
At 1 mg/L, the time-weighted mean actual concentration was 1.1 ± 0.0 mg/L. The nominal concentration (amount of test item used divided by the volume of pressurized air used) was 1.9 mg/L. This resulted in a generation efficiency (ratio of actual and nominal concentration) of 59%.
At 5 mg/L, the time-weighted mean actual concentration was 5.2 ± 0.2 mg/L. The nominal concentration was 7.0 mg/L. This resulted in a generation efficiency of 74%.
The concentration was measured at time points (n=15 and 19) that were equally distributed over the exposure period, the results of which demonstrated that the item was sufficiently stable. The variation in concentration was caused by adjustments to the generation equipment. By calculating the time-weighted mean concentration, effects of variations were taken into account resulting in an actual reflection of the mean exposure concentration over.
Table. 2 Aerodynamic Particle Size Distribution in the Test Atmosphere
Exposure group
|
Stage |
Cut point (mm) |
Mass sampled (mg) |
Relative mass (%) |
Cumulative mass (% of total sampled) |
1 mg/L
|
Measurement 1: |
||||
1 |
21.0 |
0.13 |
1.45 |
98.55 |
|
2 |
15.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
98.55 |
|
3 |
10.0 |
0.25 |
2.80 |
95.75 |
|
4 |
6.0 |
1.12 |
12.53 |
83.22 |
|
5 |
3.5 |
1.92 |
32.66 |
50.56 |
|
6 |
2.0 |
3.99 |
40.94 |
9.62 |
|
7 |
0.9 |
0.47 |
5.26 |
4.36 |
|
8 |
0.5 |
0.35 |
3.91 |
0.45 |
|
Back up |
0.25 |
0.04 |
0.45 |
0.00 |
|
MMAD1(mm): 3.4 gsd2: 2.0 |
|||||
Measurement 2 |
|||||
1 |
21.0 |
0.11 |
1.15 |
98.55 |
|
2 |
15.0 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
98.55 |
|
3 |
10.0 |
0.20 |
2.08 |
96.77 |
|
4 |
6.0 |
1.17 |
12.19 |
84.58 |
|
5 |
3.5 |
3.25 |
33.85 |
50.73 |
|
6 |
2.0 |
3.77 |
39.27 |
11.46 |
|
7 |
0.9 |
0.74 |
7.71 |
3.75 |
|
8 |
0.5 |
0.33 |
3.44 |
0.31 |
|
Back up |
0.25 |
0.03 |
0.31 |
0.00 |
|
MMAD1(mm): 3.4 gsd2: 1.9 |
|||||
5 mg/L
|
Measurement 1 |
||||
1 |
21.0 |
0.06 |
0.76 |
99.24 |
|
2 |
15.0 |
0.07 |
0.89 |
98.35 |
|
3 |
10.0 |
0.48 |
6.08 |
92.28 |
|
4 |
6.0 |
1.25 |
15.82 |
76.46 |
|
5 |
3.5 |
2.90 |
36.71 |
39.75 |
|
6 |
2.0 |
2.68 |
33.92 |
5.82 |
|
7 |
0.9 |
0.28 |
3.54 |
2.28 |
|
8 |
0.5 |
0.17 |
2.15 |
0.13 |
|
Back up |
0.25 |
0.01 |
0.13 |
0.00 |
|
MMAD1(mm): 3.4 gsd2: 2.0 |
|||||
Measurement 2 |
|||||
1 |
21.0 |
0.07 |
1.12 |
99.88 |
|
2 |
15.0 |
0.05 |
0.80 |
98.09 |
|
3 |
10.0 |
0.15 |
2.39 |
95.69 |
|
4 |
6.0 |
0.31 |
4.94 |
90.75 |
|
5 |
3.5 |
2.75 |
43.86 |
46.89 |
|
6 |
2.0 |
2.52 |
40.19 |
6.70 |
|
7 |
0.9 |
0.25 |
3.99 |
2.71 |
|
8 |
0.5 |
0.15 |
2.39 |
0.32 |
|
Back up |
0.25 |
0.02 |
0.32 |
0.00 |
|
MMAD1(mm): 3.6 gsd2: 1.9 |
1 Mass Median Aerodynamic Diamete, 2 Geometric standard deviation
Particla Size:
At 1 mg/L, the MMAD was 3.4 μm (gsd 2.0) and 3.4 μm (gsd 1.9).
At 5 mg/L, the MMAD was 3.9 μm (gsd 2.0) and 3.6 μm (gsd 1.9).
Table. 3 Mortality Data
Test Day |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
Hours after treatement |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Males 1 Mg/L |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Females 1 Mg/L |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Males 5 Mg/L |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Females 5 Mg/L |
- |
- |
- |
3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Tabel 4. Clinical signs
Treatment groups/sex |
Test Day |
Max Grade |
1 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
Hours after treatment |
1 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Males Mg/L |
Animal 1 Behavior Lethargy Posture Hunched posture |
(3)
(1) |
1
1 |
1
1 |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
Animal 2 Behavior Lethargy Posture
|
(3)
(1) |
1
1 |
1
1 |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
|
Animal 3 Behavior Lethargy Posture
Skin / fur Piloerection |
(3)
(1)
(1) |
1
1
1
|
1
1
1
|
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
|
Animal 4 Behavior Lethargy Posture Skin / fur Piloerection
|
(3)
(1)
(1) |
1
1
1
|
1
1
1
|
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
|
|
Animal 5 Behavior Lethargy Posture
|
(3)
(1) |
1
1 |
1
1 |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
Females Mg/L |
Animal 6Behavior Lethargy Posture Hunched posture |
(3)
(1) |
1
1 |
1
1 |
-
1 |
-
1 |
-
1 |
-
1 |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
Animal 7 Behavior Lethargy Posture
Skin / fur Piloerection |
(3)
(1)
(1) |
2
1
1
|
1
1
1
|
-
1
1 |
-
1
1 |
-
1
1 |
-
1
- |
-
1
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
|
Animal 8Behavior Lethargy Posture Hunched posture |
|
1
1 |
1
1 |
-
1 |
-
1 |
-
1 |
-
1 |
-
1 |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
|
Animal 9 Behavior Lethargy Posture
Skin / fur Piloerection |
(3)
(1)
(1) |
1
1
1 |
1
1
1 |
-
1
1 |
-
1
1 |
-
1
1 |
-
1
1 |
-
1
1 |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
-
-
- |
|
Animal 10 Behavior Lethargy Posture
|
|
1
1 |
1
1 |
1
1 |
1
1 |
1
1 |
1
1 |
1
1 |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
-
- |
|
Males 5 Mg/L |
Animal 11 Behavior Lethargy Posture Hunched posture Breathing Slow breathing Skin / fur Piloerection Various Ptosis |
(3)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(3) |
1
1
1
1
3 |
1
1
1
1
1 |
.
.
.
.
. |
1
1
1
1
1 |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
Animal 12 Behavior Lethargy Posture
Breathing Skin / fur Piloerection Various Ptosis |
(3)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(3) |
1
1
1
1
2 |
1
1
1
1
- |
.
.
.
.
. |
1
1
1
1
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
|
Animal 13 Behavior Lethargy Posture
Breathing Skin / fur Piloerection Various Ptosis |
(3)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(3) |
3
1
1
1
2 |
2
1
1
1
- |
.
.
.
.
. |
1
1
1
1
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
|
Animal 14 Behavior Lethargy Posture Hunched posture Breathing Slow breathing Skin / fur Piloerection |
(3)
(1)
(1)
(1)
|
1
1
1
1
|
1
1
1
1
|
.
.
.
.
|
1
1
1
1
|
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
- |
|
Animal 15 Hunched posture Breathing Slow breathing Skin / fur Piloerection |
(3)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(3) |
2
1
1
1
1 |
2
1
1
1
1 |
.
.
.
.
. |
1
1
1
1
1 |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
|
Females 5 Mg/L |
Animal 16 Hunched posture Breathing Slow breathing Skin / fur Piloerection |
(3)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(3) |
1
1
1
1
2 |
1
1
1
1
1 |
.
.
.
.
. |
1
1
1
1
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ANIMAL 17 Hunched posture Breathing Slow breathing Skin / fur Piloerection Various Pitosis |
(3)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(3) |
1
1
1
1
1 |
1
1
1
1
- |
.
.
.
.
. |
1
1
1
1
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
|
Animal 18 Flat Hunched posture Breathing Slow breathing Skin / fur Piloerection |
(3)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(3) |
2
-
1
1
1
1 |
2
1
1
1
1
2 |
.
.
.
.
.
. |
1
1
1
1
1
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Animal 19Behavior Lethargy Posture Hunched posture Breathing Slow breathing Skin / fur Piloerection Various Ptosis |
(3)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(3) |
2
1
1
1
2 |
1
1
1
1
- |
.
.
.
.
. |
1
1
1
1
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Animal 20 Behavior Lethargy Posture Hunched posture Breathing Slow breathing Skin / fur Piloerection Various Ptosis |
(3)
(1)
(1)
(1)
(3) |
2
1
1
1
2 |
2
1
1
1
2 |
.
.
.
.
. |
1
1
1
1
1 |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
-
-
-
- |
-
= Sign not observed
. = Observation not recorded
Table 5. Body weight (g)
SEX/DOSE LEVEL |
DAY 1 |
DAY 2 |
DAY 4 |
DAY 8 |
DAY 15 |
Male 1 Mg/L |
263 |
253 |
264 |
284 |
304 |
Female 1 Mg/L |
182 |
169 |
176 |
191 |
205 |
Male 5 Mg/L |
293 |
261 |
269 |
292 |
320 |
Female 5 Mg/L |
200 |
178 |
180 |
190 |
210 |
Note: No body weights were obtained for the 1 mg/L exposure group on Day 8 and for the 5 mg/L exposure group on Day 2. These body weights were recorded 1 day later, on Day 9 and Day 3, for the 1 mg/L and 5 mg/L exposure groups, respectively (see deviations in appendix 3).
* Animal was killed in extremis on Day 3.
** Animal was found dead on Day 3.
Table 6. Macroscopic Findings
Sex/Dose Level |
Animal no |
Organ |
Finding |
Day of death |
Male 1 Mg/L |
1 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
2 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
3 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
4 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
5 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
Female 1 Mg/L |
6 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
7 |
182 |
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
8 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
9 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
10 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
Male 5 Mg/L |
11 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
12 |
Thymus |
Focus/foci, many, dark red. |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
13 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
14 |
Thymus |
Right side: focus/foci, isolated, dark Red. |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
15 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
Female 5 Mg/L |
16 |
Jejunum Ileum Caecum Colon Liver Spleen Thymus |
Contents: discolouration, Black-brown. Contents: discolouration, Black-brown. Right side: focus/foci, isolated, dark Red. |
Killed in extremis.Day 3 after treatment.. |
17 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
|
18 |
General observation Thymus |
Beginning autolysis. |
Spontaneous death.Day 3 after treatment. |
|
19 |
General observation Thymus |
Beginning autolysis. |
Spontaneous death.Day 3 after treatment. |
|
20 |
|
No findings noted |
Scheduled necropsy.Day 15 after treatment |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- Category 4 based on GHS criteria
- Remarks:
- Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
- Conclusions:
- Based on the conditions of the study, the LC50 was concluded to be >1 - ≤5 mg/L for female rats and above 5 mg/L for male rats. Therefore, test item meets the criteria for acute toxicity via inhalation (Acute Toxicity Category 4) in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
- Executive summary:
OECD 403 (2019): The acute inhalation toxicity potential of the test item was assessed in Wistar Han rats of both sexes following a single 4 hour nose-only exposure to two groups of five male and five female rats at target concentrations of 1 and 5 mg/L. Animals were retained for a 14 day post exposure observation period.
At 1 mg/L, no mortality occurred. At 5 mg/L, two females were found dead and one female was killed in extremis on Day 3. No further mortality occurred. At 1 mg/L, no clinical signs were seen during exposure. After exposure, lethargy, hunched posture and piloerection were seen for the animals. The males had recovered from the clinical signs on Day 2 and the females on Day 7. At 5 mg/L, slow breathing was seen for all animals during exposure. After exposure, lethargy, hunched posture, slow breathing, piloerection and ptosis were seen for the animals. In addition, one animal that died showed flat posture. The female that was killed in extremis was not expected to recover from these signs. The surviving animals had recovered from the clinical signs on Day 4.
At 1 mg/L, overall body weight gain in males and females was within the range expected for rats of this strain and age used in this type of study and were therefore considered not indicative of toxicity. At 5 mg/L, body weight loss was noted for all surviving animals. This continued for all males and three females up to Day 8; these animals regained weight during the second week.
At 1 mg/L, no abnormalities were found at macroscopic post mortem examination of the animals. At 5 mg/L macroscopic post mortem examination revealed abnormalities of the thymus (dark red/black-brown foci and/or pale/black-brown discoloration), jejunum, ileum, caecum and colon (contents black-brown discoloration), liver (pale discoloration) and/or spleen (reduced in size) for animals that died or were sacrificed in moribund condition during the study. Macroscopic examination of the other animals revealed abnormalities of the thymus (right side and general many dark red foci) for two males. The remaining animals did not reveal any abnormalities at termination.
A difference in sensitivity between the sexes was noted as mortality occurred only for the females at 5 mg/mL. Therefore, both a combined and sex specific LC50, 4h value was determined. The combined inhalation LC50, 4h value of the test item in Wistar Han rats of both sexes was established to exceed 5 mg/L.
The sex specific inhalation LC50, 4h value of the test item in male Wistar Han rats was established to exceed 5 mg/L. The sex specific inhalation LC50, 4h value of the test item in female Wistar Han rats was established to be within the range of >1 - ≤5 mg/L.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.