Registration Dossier

Administrative data

Workers - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Workers - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Workers - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - workers

A DNEL for acute toxicity should be derived if an acute hazard leading to acute toxicity (e.g. C&L) has been identified and there is a potential for high peak exposures. This is not the case with trideca-1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6 -fluorohexane.

Toxicological studies of the substance to be registered have been conducted to assess the hazard properties. There were no effects in these studies even though they were carried out to maximally attainable vapor concentrations, limit doses, or to other limits imposed by safety considerations. As no effects were demonstrated, the data are not appropriate for DNEL derivation. As the substance is demonstrably not hazardous for effects which are quantifiable, human health exposure assessments have not been conducted.

 

Aspiration is a potential hazard, but a DNEL calculation is not appropriate for an aspiration hazard.

General Population - Hazard via inhalation route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard via dermal route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

Local effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

General Population - Hazard via oral route

Systemic effects

Long term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
Acute/short term exposure
Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified
DNEL related information

General Population - Hazard for the eyes

Local effects

Hazard assessment conclusion:
no hazard identified

Additional information - General Population

A DNEL for acute toxicity should be derived if an acute hazard leading to acute toxicity (e.g. C&L) has been identified and there is a potential for high peak exposures. This is not the case with trideca-1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,6,6 -fluorohexane.

Toxicological studies of the substance to be registered have been conducted to assess the hazard properties. There were no effects in these studies even though they were carried out to maximally attainable vapor concentrations, limit doses, or to other limits imposed by safety considerations. As no effects were demonstrated, the data are not appropriate for DNEL derivation. As the substance is demonstrably not hazardous for effects which are quantifiable, human health exposure assessments have not been conducted.

 

Aspiration is a potential hazard, but a DNEL calculation is not appropriate for an aspiration hazard.