Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 203-603-9 | CAS number: 108-65-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 1983
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP study, similar to OECD guideline No. 471.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Rat liver homogenate (S9)
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 50, 10, 1, 0.1 mg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine ( TA 100 & TA 1535 -S9), nitrofluorene ( TA98 & TA 1538 -S9), quinacrine mustard.2HCl ( TA 1537 -S9) 2-anthramine ( TA 100 & TA 1535 +S9), 2-acetylaminofluorene ( TA98 & TA 1538 +S9), 8-aminoquinoline (TA 1537
- Remarks:
- N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine ( TA 100 & TA 1535 -S9), nitrofluorene ( TA98 & TA 1538 -S9), quinacrine mustard.2HCl ( TA 1537 -S9) 2-anthramine ( TA 100 & TA 1535 +S9), 2-acetylaminofluorene ( TA98 & TA 1538 +S9), 8-aminoquinoline (TA 1537
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period:30 min
- Incubation period: 48 hours
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
3 replicates per dose
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: bacterial background lawn evaluation
- cytotoxcity was evident at 50mg test chemical per plate in all strains of bacteria, both with and without metabolic activation system
- Evaluation criteria:
- Concentrations of the test chemical which are overtly toxic are easily visualized as showing no bacterial growth on the plate (i.e. absence of background lawn). Lower levels of toxicity may be seen as a thin or sparse bacterial lawn, a reduction in the number of revertants, or the appearance of microcolonies (overgrown background lawn). Positive and negative controls were run concurrently with the test chemical, and appropriate responses for these controls are prerequesites for evaluating the response of the bacteria to the test chemical.
A test chemical is considered a bacterial mutagen if both the mean number of revertant colonies observed is at least three times higher than the mea - Species / strain:
- other: Salmonella typhimurium strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA1538
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: cytotoxcity was evident at 50mg test chemical per plate in all strains of bacteria, both with and without metabolic activation system
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- cytotoxcity was evident at 50mg test chemical per plate in all strains of bacteria, both with and without metabolic activation system.
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (DOWANOL PMA) did not cause mutations in the Ames Salmonela reverse mutation assay both with or without S-9 metabolic activation. Hence, the test material was classified as negative in the Ames test under the experimental conditions used. - Executive summary:
Propylene glycol methyl ether acetate was evaluated in the Salmonella/mammalian-microsome bacterial mutagenicity assay (Ames test) using a preincubation assay. The test was conducted using Salmonella typhimurium bacterial tester strains TA98, TA100, TA1535, TA 1537 and TA1538 at 4 doses in triplicate. The test agent was assayed 50, 10, 1, 0.1 mg/plate in all the tester strains both in the presence and absence of external metabolic activation system.
All solvent (negative) control plates and positive control plates gave frequencies of induced revertants within expected ranges. Cytotoxcity was evident at 50mg test chemical per plate in all strains of bacteria, both with and without metabolic activation system.
The test material did not induce a mutagenic response in any of the tester strains in the assays as judged by the frequencies of histidine-independent (his+) revertants. Hence, the test material was classified as negative in the Ames test under the experimental conditions used.
Reference
See the attached word document for tables and figures:
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
The studies selected as key studies are considered to be valid as they are reliable, either without restrictions (Klimisch rating 1) or with some restrictions (Klimisch rating 2). The results of the studies indicate that propylene glycol methyl ether acetate is not mutagenic, with and without an exogenous metabolic activation, in bacteria and Saccharomyces cerevisae. No increase in chromosomal aberrations was observed in vitro with and without metabolic activation. Propylene glycol methyl ether acetate did not induce UDS in rat hepatocytes.
There is no gene mutation study in mammalian cells available for PGMA. However, PGME and PGMEA are closely related in molecular structure and physicochemical properties and thus, the potential for toxicological effects. They are liquids with similar boiling points, moderate volatility, and high water solubility. No apparent differences in toxicological profile have been observed because of the rapid and extensive hydrolysis of propylene glycol methyl ether acetate (PGMA) to propylene glycol methyl ether (PGME). Metabolites and disposition profiles of PGMA are approximately identical to the results obtained with PGME. Therefore, it is justified to use the gene mutation study conducted with PGME for read-across purposes to fill the data gap for PGMA.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
The study methodology followed was equivalent or similar to OECD TG 471
Justification for classification or non-classification
Propylene glycol methyl ether acetate was not mutagenic, with and without an exogenous metabolic activation, in bacteria and Saccharomyces cerevisae. No increase in chromosomal aberrations was observed in vitro with and without metabolic activation. Propylene glycol methyl ether acetate did not induce UDS in rat hepatocytes. Therefore, no classification is needed for genotoxicity.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
