Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 202-853-6 | CAS number: 100-44-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Carcinogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- carcinogenicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- other information
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study is not a guideline study, but fulfils general scientific criteria. Thus we consider this study a klimisch 2e as it is well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles and is acceptable for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Carcinogenicity of benzyl chloride, benzal chloride, benzotrichloride and benzoyl chloride in mice by skin application
- Author:
- Fukuda K., Matsushita H., Sakabe H. and Takemoto K.
- Year:
- 1 981
- Bibliographic source:
- Gann, 72: 655-664
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- - Carcinogenicity in vivo after repeated dermal application
- Two experiments were performed with different exposure durations and concentrations. Experiment II used 3 week old weanling mice while experiment III used 7 week old mice - GLP compliance:
- not specified
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- α-chlorotoluene
- EC Number:
- 202-853-6
- EC Name:
- α-chlorotoluene
- Cas Number:
- 100-44-7
- Molecular formula:
- C7H7Cl
- IUPAC Name:
- (chloromethyl)benzene
- Reference substance name:
- chloromethylbenzene
- IUPAC Name:
- chloromethylbenzene
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): benzyl chloride (BYC)
- Supplier: Wako Pure Chemical Industries Co. Ltd., Tokyo
- Reagent grade commercial material
No further information
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- ICR
- Sex:
- female
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- dermal
- Vehicle:
- other: benzene
- Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- no
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Experiment II: 41 weeks
Experiment III: 50 weeks - Frequency of treatment:
- Experiment II: 3/w 4 w, 2/w 37 w
Experiment III: 2/w 50 w - Post exposure period:
- Experiment II: none
Experiment III: 32 weeks
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
10 μl/animal/painting (Experiment II)
Basis:
nominal conc.
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
2.3 μl/animal/painting (Experiment III)
Basis:
nominal conc.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- Experiment II: 11 animals per dose (10 animals in control group)
Experiment III: 20 animals per dose - Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
Results and discussion
Results of examinations
- Relevance of carcinogenic effects / potential:
- In experiment II no deaths or tumors were observed. Mice exposed to benzyl chloride in experiment III on the other hand did develop tumors (5/20) and mortality was 50%. The tumors found in the treated animals were skin carcinomas, lung adenomas and leiomyosarcoma of the uterus. In the control mice from experiment III only 20% mortality was observed and 2 mice developed lung adenomas. Although a difference was noted between these two groups, this could not be statistically supported which is most likely a result of the limited group size. Benzyl chloride is however considered a weak carcinogen.
Effect levels
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Basis for effect level:
- other: NOAEL could not be determined due to the study design
- Remarks on result:
- not determinable
- Remarks:
- no NOAEL identified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Experiment II:
No skin papilloma was observed
Table showing mortality, total number of mice with number and number of mice with specific tumors.
|
Dose per application (mg) |
Total dose (mg) |
Mortality (%) |
Number of mice with tumor |
Number of mice with specific tumor |
||||
Skin carcinoma |
Skin papilloma |
Lung carcinoma |
Lung adenoma |
Thymus lymph |
|||||
Control |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0/10 |
0/10 |
0/10 |
0/10 |
0/10 |
0/10 |
10 μL |
11.4 |
977 |
0 |
0/11 |
0/11 |
0/11 |
0/11 |
0/11 |
0/11 |
Experiment III:
First skin papilloma 374 days after the first application
Table showing mortality, total number of mice with number and number of mice with specific tumors.
|
Dose per application (mg) |
Total dose (mg) |
Mortality (%) |
Number of mice with tumor |
Number of mice with specific tumor |
||||
Skin carcinoma |
Skin papilloma |
Lung carcinoma |
Lung adenoma |
Others |
|||||
Control |
0 |
0 |
20 |
2/20 |
0/20 |
0/20 |
0/20 |
2/20 |
0 |
2.3 μL |
2.55 |
255 |
50 |
5/20 |
3/20 |
0/20 |
0/20 |
2/20* |
1** |
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The authors tested the carcinogenicity of benzyl chloride by painting the clipped back of ICR female mice in two different sets of sub-chronic experiments. The authors observed no deaths or tumors in experiment II. On the other hand, in experiment III, 5 out of 20 mice developed tumors such as squamous–cell carcinomas of the skin of which some metastasized to the primary lymphatic organs, liver or kidneys, others developed leiomyosarcoma of the uterus and lung adenomas. In the control group two of 20 animals developed lung adenomas. Although these results indicate a difference between the control and treated group, this observation could not be statistically supported probably as a result of the limited size of the groups. Hence benzyl chloride is considered a weak carcinogen.
- Executive summary:
The authors tested the carcinogenicity of benzyl chloride (CAS n° 100-44-7) by painting the clipped back of ICR female mice in two different sets of sub-chronic experiments. In experiment II mice received 10 μL/animal/painting, three times a week during 4 weeks and then twice a week for 37 weeks. In experiment III mice received 2.3 μL/animal/painting twice a week during 50 weeks. The dose in experiment II corresponds to a total of 977 mg approximately (i.e. 11.4 mg/). For experiment III the total dose was approximately 255 mg (2.55 mg/application). At the end of the exposure period or when the test animals died or morbidity occurred, tumors were diagnosed and counted.
In experiment II neither mortality nor tumors were observed in the control and treated group. In experiment III mortality at the end of exposure was 20% in the control and 35% in the treated group. In the control group 2/20 mice had lung adenomas while in the treated group 5/20 had tumors. Of the latter group three mice had squamous–cell carcinomas of the skin of which two metastasized to the primary lymphatic organs, liver, or kidneys. Furthermore 1 of the treated mice had a leiomyosarcoma of the uterus and 2 others had lung adenomas. Finally the first skin papilloma was noted 374 days after the first application. Although a difference between the control and treated group was seen in experiment III, the difference in skin cancer incidence was not statistically significant between the two groups most likely because of the limited size of the experimental group. Anyhow in none of the controls performed in this entire study skin tumors were noted. Therefore the skin tumors in the treated mice are assumed to be caused by the test substance and as a result benzyl chloride is considered a weak carcinogen.
The GLP status of the study is unknown, but the study is sufficiently described although it would benefit from a larger number of test animals to enable a more precise statistical analysis.Nevertheless, these experiments are based on generally well accepted scientific principles. Thus this study should be considered reliable with restrictions, a Klimisch 2e study.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.